1

The Environment / Re: The link between global warming and world population expansion.

« on: 29/09/2023 10:46:25 »

Transport of add types will always require a fuel to energise it.  Our objective is to get clean fuel at minimum cost.

So IMHO we have sensibly agreed to open a coal mine and now to resume exploiting oil in the north sea all of which will bring jobs for our children and save foreign currency.
 
It is a shame that the Welsh coal mines and power stations are not still operating or that Port Talbot steel works cannot also be brought back on line

Number one priority however, is to get the nuclear plants built to drive the base load of 20 GW or so all of which gives our kids more work and assists industry to expand economically.

Population explosion caused CO2 emissions to rise and drives global warming but using clean fuels help us all.

2

The Environment / Re: The link between global warming and world population expansion.

« on: 21/09/2023 17:47:58 »

Chris Packham seems to want us to demonstrate about the abandonment of unobtainable targets in the reductions of CO2 emissions . 
He appeared not to have understood that we cannot ban oil without replacing its versatile energy with some other form of energy source.
Renewable wind and solar are not sufficient to power our electric grid 24/7.  We should certainly consider starting to rehabilitate our existing and closed nuclear power stations.
Development of electric vehicles for inner city use is advancing well but motorway vehicles will realistically remain hybrid and continue to use diesel and petrol as their exhaust gases can be absorbed by roadside green vegetation which will photosynthesise the CO2 and produce oxygen for us or our animals to breath.

3

The Environment / Re: The link between global warming and world population expansion.

« on: 14/09/2023 16:32:50 »

You are drifting off the point that population explosion is responsible for increased CO2 emissions.
So to solve economic immigrates over running  us we need action in the countries that are causing the increase.
Why should the politicians be blamed for parents having too many children?? Well firstly they should explain to parents that they should only have the number of children that they can afford to find a job for and even build a house each for them.  No one should be allowed to abandon their children just because they are 18 and grown up.
Most of Africa, South Asia and south/central America have a problem of teenager unrest with no jobs or work blaming politicians for not expanding their economy quickly enough. But it is their own parents that are to blame. 
Politicians should however, insist that foreign donations will not undermine their economies which is happening in Africa where farmers cannot compete with free food aid that is dumped on them by mechanised nations with grain mountains to get rid of.
Further third world politicians should insist that the free maize is treated with a contraceptive to avoid pregnancies in refugee camps which is making their problem worse.
 

4

New Theories / Grand Canyon Formation

« on: 03/09/2023 12:50:32 »

Geologists seem to believe that the Colorado river formed the canyon but are unable to explain why all the separate layers formed over the last 1,200 million year are exposed when in most other canyons and gorges the river only washes down to a hard rock layer possibly a 100 metres.
The grand canyon is spectacularly over a 1,000 metres deep with multiple layers all exposed together irrespective of whether made of soft sandy or hard granite like material.
Geologists can see that something dramatic happened around 100 million years or so ago, but not how it happened.
Well, the most probable reason could be we were hit by a huge asteroid that bounced off the planet removing a 200km long scar but this would resulted in a huge crater rather than a canyon. But we could have been hit by a horseshoe shaped asteroid made of anti-matter which would annihilate matter kilogram for kilogram on contact regardless of its hardness which would result in what we see today.. 


     

5

The Environment / Re: The link between global warming and world population expansion.

« on: 23/08/2023 10:26:39 »

The problem with hydrogen gas is it cannot be compressed into liquid form and aircraft cannot carry huge tanks of compressed gas. Forming hydrogen from electrolysis as aircraft fuel is totally inefficient and what would you do with the carbon left over inside the plane??  I agree that city EV's should be mini or micro size vehicles which can be charged at home.

Getting back to root cause of this post;. Having identified that the global warming problem really is caused by global population increase we need to make a positive plan to correct the situation by assisting expanding countries to reduce their population growths.
The UN should be in the lead but not sure when they will respond with a plan.   

6

The Environment / Re: The link between global warming and world population expansion.

« on: 22/08/2023 10:25:58 »

Well, having accepted that the global warming problem really is caused by global population increase we need to make a positive plan to correct the situation by assisting expanding countries to reduce their population growths.
The UN should be in the lead but not sure when they will respond with a plan.

7

The Environment / Re: The link between global warming and world population expansion.

« on: 21/08/2023 12:40:33 »

The sky report shows clearly that no point in building more wind turbines until the 400kV grid line over the border is reinforced.
The nat grid have at least a100 foot servitude for the existing  line so immediately they must build an extra 2 quad lines one each side of the existing line. There is no time for worrying about planning consents and the government should insist on the grid starting immediately and offer to pay all pre-ordering costs upfront to avoid delays. 

8

The Environment / Re: The link between global warming and world population expansion.

« on: 20/08/2023 11:39:17 »

I agree with both the last 2 posts by Paul and Alan that if we just let things drift on some calamity natural or not will reduce the population substantially..
.
Just look at Indian sub continent and south/central America though;  we are seeing riotous unrest because the local people there are looking for someone to blame for not developing their economy and increasing their standard of living quickly enough.  But our/their politicians are ignorant or not telling people the truth that we ourselves might be to blame.
 
.
Why should we blame ourselves??
.Well, if we only had 2 surviving children per family then there would be no requirement to build extra houses, roads, water/electric infrastructure;  just a case of passing on our own houses/land to our children.  This in fact has always been the way normal inheritance has worked but families had to be larger then as there was no medical backups.. 

9

The Environment / Re: The link between global warming and world population expansion.

« on: 08/08/2023 09:46:05 »

The link between CO2 increase and population increase is not coincidental but how do we encourage people tto have smaller families??
Well, if a country produced X million $ of goods and halved its population then the per capita standard of living would double and in fact treble because there would be no need to spend money on new houses, roads, water, sewage expansion etc.
So should world aid to poorer countries be conditional on that country openly agreeing to encourage contraception?

10

The Environment / Re: The link between global warming and world population expansion.

« on: 01/08/2023 13:27:19 »

Chris Pacham EARTH last night chatted on about global freezing due to to many trees and vegetation causing a lack of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere that leads to an ice age.
But the opposite is also true that too much carbon dioxide in the air causes global ice melts and warming.
We must get to a balance point quickly by adopting policies that will correct the overpopulation in poorer countries by making them more prosperous so they do not need large families.. .
So how to balance the planet

11

The Environment / The link between global warming and world population expansion.

« on: 31/07/2023 10:32:11 »

As the population of a country expands then the requirement to feed, house and transport more people increases proportionally..


But any fossil fuel that we burn whether coal, gas or oil based will produce carbon dioxide which causes global  warming.

The following link shows the global use of fuels   

   https://ourworldindata.org/fossil-fuels 

From these stats for FOSSIL FUEL CONSUPTION  WORLD  graphs we can see that in 1965 we used 40,000 Trillion Watt hours but now are using 130,000 TWh. of fuel

This ratio of nearly 4 times is nearly identical to the increase in world population. according to UN stats.

  https://population.un.org/wpp/Graphs/DemographicProfiles/Line/900   

Government are tasked to keep up by using tax moneys to fund developments of housing and roads water, sewage, electric etc.

Governments next important responsibility is to curb landowner profiteering and remove restrictive monopolies using greenwashing to hide behind.

What governments need to do is advise its residents that their large family sizes are what is holding back its ability to increase their standard of living.

After all, if a marriage produces only 2 children then there is no need to build extra housing saving around 50% of all carbon emissions. 

12

New Theories / Re: Grand Canyon Formation By Anti-matter

« on: 02/07/2023 07:05:54 »

Pleased to note that the new space project Euclid is according to BBC news investigating dark pressure and dark energy that is forcing the universe apart.
Magnoflux theory explains this at a distance force as an electrostatic force that is 25 times stronger than gravity which hopefully will be confirmed.
No mention is made of searching for non existent dark matter.
https://magnoflux3d.wordpress.com/

13

New Theories / Re: Grand Canyon Formation By Anti-matter

« on: 17/06/2023 15:35:36 »

Stars are made of antimatter which is why telescopes can only see a shimmering magnetic surface.  The weight of the sun is not 2 x 10^30 kg but is nearer 6 x 10^28 kg once you factor in the electrostatic attraction and magnetic binding forces that at present are being ignored. .#
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3889/3019/1600/simplifiedview.2.png

14

New Theories / Re: Grand Canyon Formation By Anti-matter

« on: 13/05/2023 09:30:43 »

"Also a meteor made from antimatter would not rotate from the earths magnetic field.  The magnetic field would effect an antimatter meteor the same as it would a matter meteor"
No, antimatter would spin backwards in a steady magnetic field and thus the antimatter magnoflux inertia energy stuff would annihilate the matter stuff kg for kg. 
Planetary matter stuff is made up of electromagnetic massless stuff contained in electron shells which allow it to slow down to become touchable negative material.

15

New Theories / Re: Grand Canyon Formation By Anti-matter

« on: 12/05/2023 13:13:59 »

Thanks Alan,
The shape of the antimatter meteor must have been in a horseshoe or boomerang shape.  It will be rotating of course as the earths magnetic field would make it spin sideways while moving forwards.

The atom bomb blasted out but the antimatter annihilation would have sucked in only; nothing would go up and be scattered about.

16

New Theories / Re: Grand Canyon Formation By Anti-matter

« on: 09/05/2023 08:45:59 »

Space .com have queried this post as they consider huge energy would be released.
I have referred them to review the Tunguska event.
Please consider what happened in the Tunguska event but notice that no crater or burning rocks were ever reported the material just simply vanished. Impossible!!
If it was an anti-matter meteors that hit us this would immediately annihilate the atmospheric gases and cause a huge vacuum that of course causes an air blast that destroys forests and dwellings by sucking then out of the ground as in the case of the Tunguska event but there was no evidence of scorched trees so little or no energy creation.

Further, where is the meteorite matter gone? Simply vanished impossible; no it was annihilated kg for kg by our atmospheric gases.

17

New Theories / Grand Canyon Formation By Anti-matter

« on: 06/05/2023 16:11:46 »

Grand Canyon Formation  a Coronation Revelation
Just visited the south side and was amazed to see the layers of our planet’s historic topology staring at me.  See pictures courtesy of US national parks.    https://www.nps.gov/grca/learn/nature/grca-geology.htm 
Geologists believe that this 250 km long 25 km wide canyon was formed around 2 to 4 million years ago but cannot explain how.  Well, neither could I as if a huge asteroid collided with earth in the east west direction then the crater would be huge with smashed out rocky matter blasted forward of which there is no evidence.
But if the asteroid was made of positron enclosed anti-matter then what we see makes sense as a 25 km wide chunk of anti-matter coming in at a low angle would hit the surface of the planet and bouncing slightly as it moved forward leaving a ragged path as it annihilated kilogram for kilogram of planetary electron enclosed matter magnoflux stuff could leave behind a canyon deep enough to expose the earth’s mantle that formed over 2 thousand million years ago.
Asteroids can attain velocities of 50 km/second which means the Grand Canyon could have been formed in just 5 seconds but the annihilation of the adjacent atmosphere would have certainly sucked all trees and vegetation out of the ground tens of kilometres around the site and the Colorado river later forced to find a new way inside the canyon.
If the asteroid were a 25 km cube then around 5x10^14 tons of planetary matter would have been annihilated resulting in what we see now.

18

The Environment / Re: Global Warming. long term effects.

« on: 05/03/2023 07:58:06 »

Having just wintered in New Zealand I have noticed that the sunsets are no longer vivid but occur more frequently and are/have a washed out look.  Could this be due to more CO2 in the atmosphere?  Anyone else noticed this effect which might be linked to global warming and the intensification of  the hurricanes we have just experienced.

19

The Environment / Re: Global Warming. long term effects.

« on: 16/02/2023 21:18:12 »

Agreed, the bill of rights appears to give a husband congugal rights over his wife.  However, surely the wife should have the right to access free contraception as well as abortions.
Most countries offer residents a free national health service which soon becomes overloaded when really they should be giving free contraception to obviate the increase in population that is the root cause of the overload.
Oxfam and other charity agencies should insist that countries who apply for famine aid have or are passing a law that free contraception is available to any and all women before sending food aid that is only exasperating their problem.

20

The Environment / Re: Global Warming. long term effects.

« on: 05/02/2023 21:09:28 »

Population explosion in Sudan and south Sahara is causing huge problems as modern farming techniques need water which means that larger than ever, traditional nomadic families have nowhere to water their camels and flocks of sheep and many land up in refugee camps.  They are starving and feel totally neglected but as most have had no education become understandable desperate.
Aid agencies can assist but this may only exasperate their problem if the refugees continue to producing more children as is happening in Cox's Bazaar and other refugee camps in Syria, Afghanistan etc.
I know that providing food aid that is impregnated with a contraceptive agent is controversial but it is really necessary.
This, along with equipment to drill fresh water wells, tractors to plant seed, solar panels and car batteries for light and communications already supplied would reduce the number of starving babies we see on TV and allow the refugees to build homes and feed themselves and thus start to eat food that is not impregnated.