The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Profile of SeanB
  3. Show Posts
  4. Posts Thanked By User
  • Profile Info
    • Summary
    • Show Stats
    • Show Posts
      • Messages
      • Topics
      • Attachments
      • Thanked Posts
      • Posts Thanked By User
    • Show User Topics
      • User Created
      • User Participated In

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

  • Messages
  • Topics
  • Attachments
  • Thanked Posts
  • Posts Thanked By User

Messages - SeanB

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
1
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: 17/11/2022 12:48:19 »
And the next step from 'recycling' is where they press governments to move the costs from their behaviors to the taxpayers.
The following users thanked this post: SeanB

2
Technology / Re: Does wi-fi harm the environment?
« on: 17/10/2022 21:49:23 »
Quote from: OP
How bad is wi-fi to the environment?
Compared to what?

Rather than flying 1,000km (each way) to visit a customer in the next city, it is far better for the environment (and my time, and the cost to my employer and ultimately the public) for me to do a videoconference over WiFi.

Of course, only the first and last couple of meters of that videoconference are carried over WiFi.
-  I assume that you mean telecommunications in general
- The mobile phone in your pocket only uses WiFi while it is in the house. Once you get outside it switches to a cellular mobile network - similar technology, but on different frequencies (and financed differently).
- There is increasing interest in using satellites in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) to provide data and other communication services to people living in remote areas, plus planes and ships

In general, to send a signal farther, you need more power.
- Sending data 2 - 10 meters to a WiFi hotspot in your house uses very little energy
- Sending the same data 100-1000 meters to a cell tower takes more power
- Sending the same data 400km to an orbiting satellite takes even more power, and a much larger antenna at both ends
- That's why most data today is transmitted most of the way via optical fibers - the refractive index of the fiber redirects the laser beam into the core of the fiber, so that the signal is confined, and it travels farther with less loss and interference than wireless systems.
- Optical fibers are better for many purposes than wireless - except for the last couple of meters to where you are now. You don't want to be tethered to an optical fiber all day!

Electronics requires mining various minerals - but so does making a car or a home. The electronics in your pocket has advanced by a factor of a million in the past 40 years, and is far more environmentally friendly than the same functionality back then (as well as being thousands of times cheaper).

In contrast, cars and houses have improved their environmental credentials a bit - but at best by a factor of 2.
Quote
should we not be putting mobile phones in our pockets?
The signal levels put our by mobile phones are milliWatts for WiFi, and closer to a Watt for cellular mobile when you are far from the base station. Satellite communication takes even more.
- But all of this is negligible compared to the intense radiation from the Sun every time you walk outside.

Overall, I suggest that (where possible), rather than commuting an hour each way to work, you work from home (over WiFi), and at lunchtime you take your mobile phone with you, and go outside for a walk in the Sun - that is good for you and the environment.
The following users thanked this post: SeanB

3
General Science / Re: How cold does the planet have to get for the oceans to freeze?
« on: 15/10/2022 11:48:39 »
I have worked on their design and instrumentation but have no stock at present.
The following users thanked this post: SeanB

4
General Science / Re: What should we do with radioactive waste from the nuclear power industry ?
« on: 07/10/2022 09:14:29 »
Quote from: Niko43Gold on 06/10/2022 21:09:42
Actually Im a little worried about this war because you never know what will happen if they reach Cernobyl
Perhaps you should look at what happened when they did earlier this year
The following users thanked this post: SeanB

5
Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution / Re: Could a chicken fly?
« on: 22/09/2022 19:02:27 »
I have seen dead chickens fly at several hundred kilometres/hour. Bird strike tests on turbofan engines. This proves "chickens can fly"!
The following users thanked this post: SeanB

6
Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution / Re: Could a chicken fly?
« on: 22/09/2022 13:13:40 »
Stole from the web...
An industrious turkey farmer was always experimenting with breeding to perfect a better turkey.

His family was fond of the leg portion for dinner and there were never enough legs for everyone. After many frustrating attempts, the farmer was relating the results of his efforts to his friends at the general store get together. "Well I finally did it! I bred a turkey that has 6 legs!"

They all asked the farmer how it tasted.

"I Don't know" said the farmer. "I never could catch the darn thing!"
The following users thanked this post: SeanB

7
Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution / Re: Could a chicken fly?
« on: 21/09/2022 17:20:55 »
Quote from: Deecart on 21/09/2022 16:48:46
They dont fly freely.
Mine did, just not very far.

The natural "ur-chicken" is a social, forest-dwelling bird. Living in a flock, and being well insulated, it has no need to fly very far: they don't migrate,  mammalian predators can't fly at all, large avian raptors avoid dense forests, and small raptors (even dogs!) avoid fighting with cockerels. But it does need to sleep off the ground and to take off quickly if attacked by a mammal. So it has evolved to fill an ecological niche.

The domestic chicken is an odd creature in many ways. Most birds lay eggs once or twice a year in a distinct nest and sit on them until they hatch but the free-range  farmyard chook lays an egg every day, not always in the same place, and  only gets truly "broody" and sits on her eggs  once or twice in a lifetime. That said, the bird has been bred to have very large flight muscles (the white bit) and carries very little dead weight (leg bone), so is still capable of rapid takeoff in any direction, even by running downwind (unlike soaring birds).

Horses for courses.   
The following users thanked this post: SeanB

8
Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution / Re: Could a chicken fly?
« on: 20/09/2022 21:24:01 »
So, we can add chickens to the list of things you don't know much about.
https://www.raising-happy-chickens.com/can-chickens-fly.html#:~:text=They%20use%20their%20wings%20to,happily%20in%20a%20tree%20nearby.
The following users thanked this post: SeanB

9
Technology / Re: Shower Chairs
« on: 14/09/2022 00:38:49 »
Because if you aren't very stable on your feet at the best of times, adding a slippery floor is a recipe for disaster!
- Osteoporosis (weak bones) is common in older people, and in people who don't get enough exercise
- A broken hip is a common trigger for people to move from independent living into a nursing home
- And months of confinement to bed only causes weaker bones - leading to a downward spiral

On the other hand, being seated frees up your hands for showering, instead of supporting yourself (eg on a Zimmer frame).
The following users thanked this post: SeanB

10
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Why is aircraft destruction via lightning extremely-extremely rare?
« on: 04/09/2022 10:25:26 »
Many thanks! Old wisdom among fliers:

After 100 hours, you know everything
After 1000 hours you realise you don't know everything
After 10,000 hours you know you will never know everything

The following users thanked this post: SeanB

11
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Why do people science-people insist that Venus has the hottest surface?
« on: 28/08/2022 17:28:40 »
Quote from: Halc on 28/08/2022 14:50:15
The 'surface' is where the atmosphere ends, not necessarily where the solid starts.

That's not well-defined for a gas giant, though. As you go deeper into the atmosphere, the pressure and temperature increases until you go from a gas to a supercritical fluid (which has characteristics intermediate between that of a gas and a liquid).
The following users thanked this post: SeanB

12
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Why is aircraft destruction via lightening extremely-extremely rare?
« on: 27/08/2022 15:03:12 »
It's a common occurrence at intermediate altitudes (generally below 10,000 ft) and  can be a bit of a bugger but all the metal bits of the airframe are carefully bonded together so that the machine is effectively a Faraday cage with no potential difference between the parts. Radio and radar aerials that project through the shell are protected by discharge tubes or semiconductor shunts.

The real problem is the attendant turbulence, which can indeed destroy an airframe or distort it into an unflyable state, and violent "downbursts" of descending air and precipitation that can push you into the trees on approach (there's no excuse for taking off in a thunderstorm, but what goes up must come down). Rapid icing and hail damage in and around cumulonimbus should be survivable if it's not avoidable, but there are limits to what can be done or avoided by any particular aircraft, and no limits to what nature can throw at you.

I recall being struck twice on approach to Dublin. Lots of noise and shaking for a fraction of a second, but the real problem was landing on 2 inches of hailstones.

A friend got sucked into a cu-nim in a glider which rapidly disintegrated. He extricated himself from the still-rising wreckage and had the presence of mind not to open his parachute until he fell out of the cloud. He now wears a little gold caterpillar lapel badge, the emblem of parachute survivors. 
The following users thanked this post: SeanB

13
Physiology & Medicine / Re: Why has no Warp Speed Pill been invented to Stop Periods?
« on: 04/08/2022 21:24:32 »
A very few men are  so sexually insecure and socially inadequate that they feel a need or even a right to assault women. These are the people who need medical treatment, not all women.
The following users thanked this post: SeanB

14
Just Chat! / Re: Do British pubs typically serve restaurant quality food?
« on: 04/08/2022 17:56:01 »
There has been a massive change in my lifetime, following tighter drink-driving legislation. In my youth, pub food was a grudging addition to encourage lunchtime drinking. With decreasing consumption of alcohol, and increasing competition from supermarkets, the majority of pubs have at least increased the scale and variety of their offerings and a good many are now really restaurants with decent draught beer and a dartboard. My chef son produces Michelin-star food in pubs.
The following users thanked this post: SeanB

15
Physiology & Medicine / Re: Why has no Warp Speed Pill been invented to Stop Periods?
« on: 04/08/2022 17:36:12 »
Anyone with a brain would be in favor of reducing the population. The means to do so safely and cheaply has been around since 1960. As BC says, how you use it is a matter of choice, unless you subscribe to some bizarre superstition that allows dirty old men to determine your sex life and reproduction.
The following users thanked this post: SeanB

16
Physiology & Medicine / Re: Why has no Warp Speed Pill been invented to Stop Periods?
« on: 04/08/2022 13:42:36 »
Quote from: championoftruth on 04/08/2022 12:23:21
You appear to be in the wrong forum. This is not the games forum.
Are you deliberately missing the point, or just... well missing it for some other reason?
The following users thanked this post: SeanB

17
Physiology & Medicine / Re: Why has no Warp Speed Pill been invented to Stop Periods?
« on: 04/08/2022 13:39:01 »
Quote from: championoftruth on 04/08/2022 12:22:25
Quote from: Bored chemist on 03/08/2022 22:35:05
It has.

Where?
OK, This is the bit where you make it utterly clear that you do not know what you are talking about.

The usual formulation for the contraceptive pill is 21 pills with active ingredients in - typically both a progestin and an oestrogen- and then 7 days without pills during which so called "withdrawal bleeding" occurs.
But if you keep taking the active pills that doesn't happen.

So, this "magical " pill you say should be invented at "warp speed" is "the pill" and  has been around for half a century.

Did it occur to you that you should ask a doctor, or at least a woman, about this before posting?

The following users thanked this post: SeanB

18
Physiology & Medicine / Re: Is the male anus higher than the female anus?
« on: 02/08/2022 22:34:12 »
When it comes to political speeches, the male anus is certainly louder and more often heard than the female, but the contents are indistinguishable.
The following users thanked this post: SeanB

19
Technology / Re: Can rechargeable 9volt in guitar?
« on: 28/07/2022 10:53:40 »
Not a sensible option in the first place. The current drain in a guitar is very small even when switched on, so battery life is determined by the self-discharge and corrosion characteristics of the battery - long-life alkalines are far better in both respects. I get about 2 years' worth of rehearsals and gigs from a 9V Duracell.

That said, the guitar should work OK even without a battery, though you won't get any boost effects. So if it doesn't work, it's possible that the electronics have been corroded, the pickup selector switch has failed, the battery connector has gone open-circuit (another reason for not using rechargeables - the connectors don't last too long if you keep taking them off!)  or that the output jack is broken. If the LED doesn't light up, the problem is in the battery - jack - on/off switch part of the circuit. or maybe the lad has tried to connect a NIMH battery back to front with the jack in place - that could indeed fry everything including the LED. Seen it all, in the last 70 years of playing.
The following users thanked this post: SeanB

20
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Star distance appearences
« on: 20/07/2022 00:26:16 »
Quote from: CatherineMaguire
It is a well known fact that stars that we see don't exist anymore
It is a well known expectation that most of the stars we see with our eyes do still exist.
- There are a few exceptions, such as a few stars that are thought to be nearing the end of their lives, and displaying some instability. They are very bright, so we see them from far away, and it is possible that they have already gone supernova.
- But most of the stars we can see have life expectancies far in excess of the light-travel time.
The following users thanked this post: SeanB

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.077 seconds with 65 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.