1

New Theories / Does science assume aether

« on: 09/12/2022 12:26:03 »

The luminiferous aether was originally proposed as the medium necessary for the propagation of light and other em waves with the analogy to sound waves and other mechanical wave phenomena. Since no proof or disproof of the existence has ever been demonstrated it has no place in real science. Yet it remains a core belief with many who hold what I would call scientific beliefs rather than scientific rationality. When will it be consigned to the dustbin?

Are you joking ? All of science still uses different variations of an aether so why wouldn't people just call it an aether ?

Higgs used a Higgs field , Einstein used space-time curvature etc .

I personally use the conservation of zero point energy . 

2

New Theories / Hijack: Conserved zero point energy idea

« on: 06/12/2022 16:05:37 »

If we could accept an "edit" to the details of the Big Bang Theory

That's like accepting an edit to 2+2=4 to 2+3=4. A simple change, but the mathematics don't work anymore. You are free to still believe that 2+3=4 because it makes you feel happy, but it isn't a valid theory. You are also utterly free to ignore where people point out where 2+3=4 doesn't work and continue asserting it, and even asking if anything is wrong with it.

True. TRUE.
That is why I hypothesize out here on the "lighter side", and I don't call my rantings a theory; they are ideas for discussion.




165953,166043,

Why does the Universe require any ''bangs'' when spaces potential to conserve energy could form a quantum mainframe that was constructed of zero point conserved energy?
ham.jpg (23.49 kB . 595x352 - viewed 1236 times)Food for thought
Uni.jpg (16.69 kB . 365x332 - viewed 1177 times)

3

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Can we detect coloured objects wavelength's by device?

« on: 06/12/2022 14:05:15 »

Can we detect coloured objects wavelength's by device?