The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution
  4. Is there a metabolic cost to the generation of bright colours in animals?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Is there a metabolic cost to the generation of bright colours in animals?

  • 2 Replies
  • 5186 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Gary Staab

  • Guest
Is there a metabolic cost to the generation of bright colours in animals?
« on: 25/04/2008 15:38:51 »
Gary Staab asked the Naked Scientists:
It there a metabolic cost to the generation of bright colours on certain animals? Some birds for instance have brighter breeding colours. Thanks for any help you can give. regards, Gary
What do you think?
Logged
 



Marked as best answer by on 07/05/2023 08:54:18

another_someone

  • Guest
  • Undo Best Answer
  • Is there a metabolic cost to the generation of bright colours in animals?
    « Reply #1 on: 25/04/2008 16:44:28 »
    Can't see why there would be.  There may be a risk in some case in higher predation (rather depends on the animal - in many species, bright colours are a warning of poison, and so may help against predation).

    If the colour is a warning of toxins, then I would guess the toxins would probably have a metabolic cost; and it is conceivable that certain particular cases of bright colours might be indicative of a more complex process that has a cost.

    Bear in mind that what may seem bright in the visual spectrum on one animal, may not be visible at all as a colour within the visual spectrum of another animal, since different species of animals can have very different ranges of colour they are able to see.
    Logged
     

    Offline Kryptid

    • Global Moderator
    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ********
    • 7762
    • Activity:
      13.5%
    • Thanked: 483 times
      • View Profile
    Is there a metabolic cost to the generation of bright colours in animals?
    « Reply #2 on: 25/04/2008 16:49:15 »
    I suspect that there would be, although it probably depends on how the bright colors are created. Bright colors in some animals are due to pigments, whereas others are due to certain optical effects caused by microstructures (as in certain butterflies). In birds, both forms are known.

    If the pigment needs to be created by the bird's metabolism, then cellular machinery that was inactive or less active in the nonbreeding phase would need to become more active during the breeding phase. This would require some expenditure of energy. On the other hand, carotenoid pigments can be obtained from a bird's diet (such as in the northern cardinal), which probably requires much less metabolic effort than generating pigments from scratch.

    EDIT: Actually, I can think of a possible scenario where putting on breeding colors would be less expensive metabolically than having their normal coloration. I don't know if this is the case in any species, but it seems plausible. Let's say that a bird is normally green due to a combination of yellow pigmentation and blue iridescence (due to the microstructures I mentioned earlier). Let's also say that the breeding color of this particular bird is blue. In order to achieve that color, all it would have to do is stop producing yellow pigment. All that's left would be the blue iridescence. Hence, a lack of pigment could produce new coloration.
    « Last Edit: 26/04/2008 03:23:08 by Supercryptid »
    Logged
     



    • Print
    Pages: [1]   Go Up
    « previous next »
    Tags:
     

    Similar topics (5)

    What is the gall bladder, what does a gall bladder do and do animals have one?

    Started by hamzaBoard Physiology & Medicine

    Replies: 5
    Views: 18932
    Last post 22/11/2007 04:59:02
    by SquarishTriangle
    Are animals left or right "handed"?

    Started by ...lets split up...Board Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution

    Replies: 8
    Views: 14595
    Last post 23/11/2008 20:04:00
    by ...lets split up...
    QotW - 19.10.14 - Are most animals edible? Would the dinosaurs be edible?

    Started by MarianaMBoard Question of the Week

    Replies: 8
    Views: 6202
    Last post 22/10/2019 08:36:42
    by chiralSPO
    Can DNA evolution switches in transparent animals change electron energy levels?

    Started by Nicholas LeeBoard Chemistry

    Replies: 1
    Views: 3816
    Last post 09/07/2016 12:37:49
    by puppypower
    How do magnetically-sensitive animals react to a reversal in Earth's field?

    Started by FredLBoard Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution

    Replies: 6
    Views: 6554
    Last post 14/12/2018 17:17:25
    by chris
    There was an error while thanking
    Thanking...
    • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
      Privacy Policy
      SMFAds for Free Forums
    • Naked Science Forum ©

    Page created in 0.28 seconds with 35 queries.

    • Podcasts
    • Articles
    • Get Naked
    • About
    • Contact us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Policy
    • Subscribe to newsletter
    • We love feedback

    Follow us

    cambridge_logo_footer.png

    ©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.