The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Does "point mass" make sense?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Does "point mass" make sense?

  • 5 Replies
  • 7226 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline itisus (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 56
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Does "point mass" make sense?
« on: 06/03/2009 03:44:34 »
Somewhere on the WWW I read that the mass of some particle had been localized to some volume ridiculously smaller than the Planck volume.  How is it possible to determine a position so precisely while being certain the momentum (and mass) is even positive?  Heisenberg Uncertainty seems to prohibit it.
Logged
 



Offline Vern

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2072
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
    • Photonics
Does "point mass" make sense?
« Reply #1 on: 06/03/2009 05:10:07 »
I suspect this might be the same kind of volume measurement technique that was used at MIT to determine the size of the electron. The limit of their instrument was a certain small value; they measured nothing; they then assumed the size must be smaller than their small value limit.

I suspect that in the case of the electron measurement and probably in the one you cite here, they were trying to detect some imagined solid something, when in fact the thing was in reality a confined electromagnetic phenomenon. That last sentence is my own speculation. But it explains the null results.

I find that in software programming, it is usually an error to assign a value to a null result. In that case, null simply means that the value is unknown.



Logged
 

Offline lightarrow

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 4605
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 16 times
    • View Profile
Does "point mass" make sense?
« Reply #2 on: 06/03/2009 12:41:29 »
Quote from: itisus on 06/03/2009 03:44:34
Somewhere on the WWW I read that the mass of some particle had been localized to some volume ridiculously smaller than the Planck volume.  How is it possible to determine a position so precisely while being certain the momentum (and mass) is even positive?  Heisenberg Uncertainty seems to prohibit it.
Where did you read it?
Logged
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 53226
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 171 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Does "point mass" make sense?
« Reply #3 on: 06/03/2009 13:21:24 »
Oh yes ::))

The link my man, the link...
Logged
"BOMB DISPOSAL EXPERT. If you see me running, try to keep up."
 

Offline itisus (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 56
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Does "point mass" make sense?
« Reply #4 on: 20/03/2009 04:49:06 »
I could not find it again and now think I may have been wrong.  The number I remembered was 10^-80 cm, but that may have been 10^-80 cm^3 volume, much larger than Planck scale. :^(  It only bothered me later sice I was looking for something else.
Logged
 



Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 53226
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 171 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Does "point mass" make sense?
« Reply #5 on: 21/03/2009 21:48:31 »
So do the same search again please, one never knows :)
Logged
"BOMB DISPOSAL EXPERT. If you see me running, try to keep up."
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Why do colours add up together to make other colours?

Started by bizerlBoard General Science

Replies: 16
Views: 36903
Last post 28/06/2020 23:52:21
by evan_au
Can black holes lose enough mass to stop being black holes?

Started by thedocBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 17
Views: 16773
Last post 21/08/2012 07:57:00
by Emc2
Do sounds add together to make louder sounds?

Started by PhoebeBoard General Science

Replies: 28
Views: 41431
Last post 13/05/2020 00:20:25
by Colin2B
Could Enough Water Make A Water Star?

Started by neilepBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 17
Views: 40037
Last post 17/03/2018 21:01:28
by Recrudesce
Can I make iodine crystals from povidone iodine?

Started by chewwchewwBoard Chemistry

Replies: 14
Views: 63668
Last post 30/09/2018 13:41:19
by Bored chemist
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.191 seconds with 45 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.