The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14] 15 16   Go Down

why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?

  • 305 Replies
  • 37527 Views
  • 6 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 17715
  • Activity:
    66%
  • Thanked: 1437 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #260 on: 24/01/2023 10:56:47 »
So far, nobody has produced a better geometric construction than Huygens for predicting diffraction.  If it ain't busted, don't fix it.

The problem with epicycles is that they purported to be an explanation, not a predictive construction, and implied a mechanical structure for which there was no evidence. We still use a sort of epicycle mathematics to make remarkably accurate tide tables but they are under continuous revision as everyone realises that there are nth order effects that are easier to measure than to calculate..   
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 



Offline hamdani yusuf (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7367
  • Activity:
    76.5%
  • Thanked: 260 times
    • View Profile
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #261 on: 25/01/2023 11:33:25 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 24/01/2023 10:56:47
So far, nobody has produced a better geometric construction than Huygens for predicting diffraction.  If it ain't busted, don't fix it.

The problem with epicycles is that they purported to be an explanation, not a predictive construction, and implied a mechanical structure for which there was no evidence. We still use a sort of epicycle mathematics to make remarkably accurate tide tables but they are under continuous revision as everyone realises that there are nth order effects that are easier to measure than to calculate..   
How does it produce reflection?
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 17715
  • Activity:
    66%
  • Thanked: 1437 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #262 on: 25/01/2023 11:49:17 »
Every point at which the wavefront is reflected is treated as the source of the reflected wavelets.

Remember, as always, that Huygens is a geometric construction that mimics what happens, not an explanation of how it happens.
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline hamdani yusuf (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7367
  • Activity:
    76.5%
  • Thanked: 260 times
    • View Profile
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #263 on: 26/01/2023 04:08:05 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 25/01/2023 11:49:17
Every point at which the wavefront is reflected is treated as the source of the reflected wavelets.

Remember, as always, that Huygens is a geometric construction that mimics what happens, not an explanation of how it happens.
Can it explain reflection by a polarizer?
My experiment shows that incoming microwave is almost completely reflected by the polarizer, despite the gap between conductors in the polarizer grid are much larger than the diameter of the conductors themselves.
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 17715
  • Activity:
    66%
  • Thanked: 1437 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #264 on: 26/01/2023 07:58:33 »
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 26/01/2023 04:08:05
Can it explain reflection by a polarizer?
Once again, it is a geometric construction, not an explanation.
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 



Offline hamdani yusuf (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7367
  • Activity:
    76.5%
  • Thanked: 260 times
    • View Profile
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #265 on: 26/01/2023 09:29:16 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 26/01/2023 07:58:33
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 26/01/2023 04:08:05
Can it explain reflection by a polarizer?
Once again, it is a geometric construction, not an explanation.
How do you geometrically construct the result of reflection by a polarizer?
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 

Offline hamdani yusuf (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7367
  • Activity:
    76.5%
  • Thanked: 260 times
    • View Profile
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #266 on: 02/06/2023 14:12:20 »
I asked Google Bard about the difference between diffraction and interference of light. IMO, the answer is better than many other sources I quoted in earlier posts.

what are the differences between diffraction and interference of light?
Quote
Diffraction and interference are both wave phenomena that occur when light passes through an opening or around an obstacle. However, there are some key differences between the two.

Diffraction is the bending of waves around an obstacle or through an opening. This occurs because waves can interfere with themselves, and when they do, they can create new patterns of light and dark. Diffraction is a property of all waves, including light, sound, and water waves.
Interference is the superposition of two or more waves. When two waves interfere, they can either add together to create a brighter wave (constructive interference) or cancel each other out to create a darker wave (destructive interference). Interference is a property of waves that have the same frequency and wavelength.

Diffraction   
Bending of waves around an obstacle or through an opening   
Property of all waves   
Creates new patterns of light and dark   

Interference
Superposition of two or more waves
Property of waves that have the same frequency and wavelength
Can create brighter or darker waves
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 

Offline hamdani yusuf (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7367
  • Activity:
    76.5%
  • Thanked: 260 times
    • View Profile
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #267 on: 02/06/2023 14:21:07 »
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 02/06/2023 14:12:20
Property of all waves
This answer made me ask follow up question. Does diffraction occur in guitar string wave?
Quote
Yes, diffraction occurs in guitar string waves. When a guitar string is plucked, it vibrates and produces a wave that travels along the string. This wave is a longitudinal wave, which means that the particles of the string move back and forth in the same direction that the wave is traveling.

As the wave travels along the string, it diffracts around the bridge and nut, which are the two points where the string is attached to the guitar. This diffraction causes the wave to spread out and create a wider pattern of vibration.

The amount of diffraction that occurs depends on the wavelength of the wave and the size of the opening that the wave is passing through. The shorter the wavelength and the smaller the opening, the more diffraction will occur.

Diffraction is an important phenomenon that affects the sound of a guitar. It helps to create the wide, rich sound that is characteristic of a guitar.

I was interested about the waving guitar string, not the sound caused by vibration of the string. Thus I modified the question. Does diffraction occur in guitar string wave in vacuum?
Quote

No, diffraction does not occur in guitar string waves in a vacuum. Diffraction is the bending of waves around an obstacle or through an opening. This occurs because waves can interfere with themselves, and when they do, they can create new patterns of light and dark. However, sound waves, such as the waves created by a guitar string, cannot travel through a vacuum. Sound waves require a medium to travel through, such as air or water. Without a medium, sound waves cannot propagate and therefore cannot diffract.

However, if the guitar string were in a medium, such as air, then diffraction would occur. For example, if the guitar string were plucked in a room, the sound waves would diffract around the walls of the room and create a pattern of sound waves in the room. This pattern would be similar to the interference pattern created by light waves.
It doesn't seem to notice that its answer contradicts its previous claim.
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 

Offline varsigma

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 169
  • Activity:
    2.5%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #268 on: 04/06/2023 01:21:08 »
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 27/08/2021 06:12:43
Two distinct phenomena shouldn't be confused just because they often come together. As long as they can occur separately, the distinction should be kept clear.
I think, in the age of quantum information science, that it doesn't pay to get too attached to a particular view or picture.
It shouldn't be something that becomes . . . precious to you.

For instance, the Aharonov-Bohm effect. Is this distinct from an interference effect? A diffraction effect? Is it something  else?

I know a guy (who probably knows a guy) who appears to believe it's about whether you can put things in bottles--a test of physicality. He's looking for one bottle to rule them all. pfft.

p.s. ChatGPT, or Bard, is bound to contradict itself, it isn't able to understand what that is.
« Last Edit: 04/06/2023 01:35:07 by varsigma »
Logged
 



Offline hamdani yusuf (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7367
  • Activity:
    76.5%
  • Thanked: 260 times
    • View Profile
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #269 on: 04/06/2023 15:01:30 »
Quote from: varsigma on 04/06/2023 01:21:08
For instance, the Aharonov-Bohm effect. Is this distinct from an interference effect? A diffraction effect? Is it something  else?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aharonov%E2%80%93Bohm_effect
Quote
The Aharonov?Bohm effect, sometimes called the Ehrenberg?Siday?Aharonov?Bohm effect, is a quantum mechanical phenomenon in which an electrically charged particle is affected by an electromagnetic potential (φ, A), despite being confined to a region in which both the magnetic field B and electric field E are zero.[1] The underlying mechanism is the coupling of the electromagnetic potential with the complex phase of a charged particle's wave function, and the Aharonov?Bohm effect is accordingly illustrated by interference experiments.
The experiment shows an additional effect on top of diffraction and interference effects.
Basically, we can add other effects as well, such as reflection and polarization to our designed experiments. But they should not confuse us about the definitions and boundaries of each effects.
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 

Offline hamdani yusuf (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7367
  • Activity:
    76.5%
  • Thanked: 260 times
    • View Profile
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #270 on: 04/06/2023 15:05:32 »
Quote from: varsigma on 04/06/2023 01:21:08
I think, in the age of quantum information science, that it doesn't pay to get too attached to a particular view or picture.
It shouldn't be something that becomes . . . precious to you.
Machine learning is said to be statistics on steroids. The more frequent a false information is trained to the AI model, the harder it gets to correct it later. Hence there's an incentive to feed them the correct information in the first place.
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 

Offline hamdani yusuf (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7367
  • Activity:
    76.5%
  • Thanked: 260 times
    • View Profile
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #271 on: 04/06/2023 15:08:40 »
Quote from: varsigma on 04/06/2023 01:21:08
p.s. ChatGPT, or Bard, is bound to contradict itself, it isn't able to understand what that is.
There's a technique called self reflection, which has been shown to significantly improve answers of AI models.
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 17715
  • Activity:
    66%
  • Thanked: 1437 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #272 on: 04/06/2023 16:16:44 »
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 02/06/2023 14:21:07
When a guitar string is plucked, it vibrates and produces a wave that travels along the string. This wave is a longitudinal wave, which means that the particles of the string move back and forth in the same direction that the wave is traveling.
Wrong, obviously. Not a good starting point for an essay.
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 
The following users thanked this post: hamdani yusuf



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 17715
  • Activity:
    66%
  • Thanked: 1437 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #273 on: 04/06/2023 16:17:38 »
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 04/06/2023 15:08:40
There's a technique called self reflection, which has been shown to significantly improve answers of AI models.
However much you polish a turd, you end up with a turd.
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline hamdani yusuf (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7367
  • Activity:
    76.5%
  • Thanked: 260 times
    • View Profile
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #274 on: 05/06/2023 13:18:48 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 04/06/2023 16:17:38
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 04/06/2023 15:08:40
There's a technique called self reflection, which has been shown to significantly improve answers of AI models.
However much you polish a turd, you end up with a turd.
Have you read the research paper on it? It shows statistically significant improvement. What's your explanation?
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 17715
  • Activity:
    66%
  • Thanked: 1437 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #275 on: 05/06/2023 17:20:01 »
My daughter-in-law is a civil engineer with an interest in sewage. I'll ask her about the statistics of turds, both raw and polished.
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline paul cotter

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1198
  • Activity:
    35%
  • Thanked: 138 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #276 on: 05/06/2023 19:16:18 »
That's an interesting snippet of off topic information. Your good daughter in law must then be familiar with sir Joseph Bazelgette. It' a small world in terms of degrees of separation. PS I hope your ticker is behaving itself-you must feel like fish out of water with your license suspended. And Hamdani, apologies for any resultant distraction.
Logged
Did I really say that?
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 17715
  • Activity:
    66%
  • Thanked: 1437 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #277 on: 05/06/2023 22:58:26 »
If you are ever in London, I can highly recommend a visit to Bazalgette's Crossness Pumping Station - amazing Victorian engineering and decorative ironwork and tiles worthy of a cathedral, being restored by brilliant and talented enthusiasts. I took a guided tour last summer beginning with a walk around City public toilets and the history of Cockney poo since the Romans, a lecture on the Great Stink (1858, not the current government) then a boat trip along the Thames to the Station and Museum of Toilets. Marvellous day out!

Interesting that Bazalgette's descendants now produce TV shows like Big Brother - they must have sh1t in their DNA!
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline hamdani yusuf (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7367
  • Activity:
    76.5%
  • Thanked: 260 times
    • View Profile
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #278 on: 06/06/2023 07:33:39 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 05/06/2023 17:20:01
My daughter-in-law is a civil engineer with an interest in sewage. I'll ask her about the statistics of turds, both raw and polished.
Plants can turn turds into fruits.
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 

Offline hamdani yusuf (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7367
  • Activity:
    76.5%
  • Thanked: 260 times
    • View Profile
Re: why do a lot of people confuse between interference and diffraction?
« Reply #279 on: 06/06/2023 14:21:17 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 04/06/2023 16:16:44
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 02/06/2023 14:21:07
When a guitar string is plucked, it vibrates and produces a wave that travels along the string. This wave is a longitudinal wave, which means that the particles of the string move back and forth in the same direction that the wave is traveling.
Wrong, obviously. Not a good starting point for an essay.
The AI model only learned from selected curated text sources. It can't cross check with real experimental observations where it can play around with.
Perhaps the data it was trained with don't adequately explain about wave propagation on a string, which is why when I asked about it, I get an explanation about sound wave instead.
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14] 15 16   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: interference  / diffraction  / #physics  / #diffraction  / #optics  / #interference 
 

Similar topics (5)

Why will the same situation cause some people to choose a fight response and other to choose a flight response?

Started by thedocBoard Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 1
Views: 6835
Last post 08/08/2016 23:31:55
by evan_au
Why Do People Wave at and Wave From Boats ?

Started by neilepBoard Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 5
Views: 18288
Last post 14/07/2018 09:20:33
by Colin2B
Why are more people right handed than left handed?

Started by thedocBoard Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 4
Views: 10063
Last post 12/01/2018 07:12:19
by Monox D. I-Fly
Why do people with brown hair have brown eyes?

Started by Dana LippstreuBoard Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution

Replies: 5
Views: 15994
Last post 19/02/2009 10:30:11
by lyner
Why Are Some People Short-sighted and others Long Sighted ?

Started by neilepBoard Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 7
Views: 13435
Last post 21/10/2018 15:56:56
by Catastrophe
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.506 seconds with 79 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.