The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Einstein's SRT, 1905 - 2022.
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Einstein's SRT, 1905 - 2022.

  • 2 Replies
  • 631 Views
  • 1 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline socrat44 (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 1
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Einstein's SRT, 1905 - 2022.
« on: 25/11/2022 20:59:01 »
 Einstein's SRT, 1905 - 2022.   
----
1905. "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies"/Einstein/
2022. Today we know, Einstein's "electrodynamics bodies" are quantum particles:
light quanta & electrons.
Therefore, Einstein's "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies" is about
the behavior of light quanta & electrons.
#
1905. Einstein asked: "Does the Inertia of a Body Depend Upon its Energy"
The answer was "Yes, the Inertia of a Body depends upon its Energy: E=mc^2''.
2022. Today we know, Einstein's "Body" is quantum particles: light & electron.
It means; inertial movement of light & electron depends on its energy: E=mc^2.
In 1927 Dirac corrected Einstein's writing, E=mc^2 has dualistic nature: E=±MC².
#
''There is one simplification at least. Electrons behave ... in exactly the same way
 as photons; they are both screwy, but in exactly in the same way.''
/Feynman/
Feynman quote means that the electron and photon (as a wave, not as a corpuscular)
 behave in the same way, because they both have energy E=h*f and
difference between them only in frequency (f).
#
"Why do we study so many particles? Understanding really
what an electron is would be enough". /Einstein/
#
You know, it would be sufficient to really understand the electron.
/Albert Einstein/
#
To a request to explain what an electron really is supposed to be we can only answer,
 “It is part of the A, B, C of physics”.
 /Sir Arthur Stanley Eddington/
-----
An electron is not a simple quantum particle.
----..
1) Einstein found the energy of electron as: E=h*f
2) Sommerfeld found the formula of an electron as: e^2=ah*c
3) Schrödinger hid the electron in the wave (Ψ) function.
4) Dirac wrote a dualistic formula of electrons:  E=±MC².
5) According to QED, the interaction with a vacuum electron's
energy becomes infinite: E= ∞
6) The electron follows Fermi- Dirac statistics.
7) The electron obeys Pauli Exclusion Law.
8) The electron obeys the Heisenberg Uncertainty Law (Δx Δp ≈ ħ/4π)
9) Electrons take an important part in Maxwell’s electrodynamics
  (Lorentz force — theory of electrons: F = qE + qv × B)
10) Electrons tied with hydrogen atoms by the energy: E=-me^4/2h*^2= -13,6eV
11) According to SRT an electron cannot be a stable, solid, firm, steel particle.
12) Electrons obey “The Law of Conservation and Transformation of energy/ mass”.
-------.
Conclusion:
We know the electron by what it does, not by what it is.
Electron is much wiser than we are thinking of him.
(but, of course, scientists have the ability to manipulate an electron's free will)
It is better to understand an Electron before discovering new particles.
---------.
Logged
 



Offline paul cotter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 723
  • Activity:
    21%
  • Thanked: 99 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: Einstein's SRT, 1905 - 2022.
« Reply #1 on: 25/11/2022 21:20:04 »
Science describes the behaviour of matter and energy but what the true nature of these entities is, is something we do not know and may never know.
Logged
 

Offline Origin

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1790
  • Activity:
    6%
  • Thanked: 142 times
  • Nothing of importance
    • View Profile
Re: Einstein's SRT, 1905 - 2022.
« Reply #2 on: 29/11/2022 21:30:33 »
Quote from: socrat44 on 25/11/2022 20:59:01
Today we know, Einstein's "Body" is quantum particles: light & electron.
It means; inertial movement of light & electron depends on its energy: E=mc^2
I don't think this is correct.  E=mc^2 can be used to determine the equivalent energy of an electrons rest mass, not it's KE.
E=mc^2 cannot be used for determining the energy of a photon since a photon has no rest mass.
Quote from: socrat44 on 25/11/2022 20:59:01
Einstein found the energy of electron as: E=h*f
That equation is used to determine the energy of a photon not an electron.
Quote from: socrat44 on 25/11/2022 20:59:01
According to QED, the interaction with a vacuum electron's energy becomes infinite: E= ∞
An electrons energy is obviously never infinite.
Quote from: socrat44 on 25/11/2022 20:59:01
Electron is much wiser than we are thinking of him.
(but, of course, scientists have the ability to manipulate an electron's free will)
Please don't anthropomorphize electrons, they hate that.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: no 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.309 seconds with 36 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.