The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Profile of Colin2B
  3. Show Posts
  4. Messages
  • Profile Info
    • Summary
    • Show Stats
    • Show Posts
      • Messages
      • Topics
      • Attachments
      • Thanked Posts
      • Posts Thanked By User
    • Show User Topics
      • User Created
      • User Participated In

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

  • Messages
  • Topics
  • Attachments
  • Thanked Posts
  • Posts Thanked By User

Messages - Colin2B

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 282
1
General Science / Re: Are space and time just two sides of the same coin?
« on: Yesterday at 23:20:48 »
Quote from: Origin on Yesterday at 19:24:38
[ the OP is clearly not the slightest bit interested in learning anything, he apparently knows all. 
I really don’t mind if someone just wants to discuss their own ideas, but to constantly accuse others of not thinking is just plain rude.

2
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: Yesterday at 17:35:10 »


Quote from: yor_on on 03/07/2022 17:41:17
Thinking of it. Forgot to reply on bullying Collin. There's also the trick where you place someone in a corner, making it untenable for that person, you don't touch him, you just keep on bullying until he loses it.

Ah, yes, now I understand.
So, for example. If in your own country someone disagrees with you you can put them in prison and deny them access to the press etc. However, if they move abroad into a country that allows criticism then they can continue. That clearly pushes you into an untenable corner and you are justified in taking action and having them kill(oops, sorry) neutralised.
So, Litvinenko and Skripal, you were the bullies and Putin the innocent victim.
So @hamdani yusuf  eat your heart out, this is the new universal moral standard.

3
General Science / Re: Are space and time just two sides of the same coin?
« on: Yesterday at 17:23:02 »
Quote from: Origin on Yesterday at 14:43:39
Quote from: Seafire on 04/07/2022 00:54:25
I tiled my bathroom without the use of a ruler because I could measure off the job, no convention was needed.
The tiles were your convention.
I agree. There is a lot here that would be worth discussing, but the constant snide remarks are getting wearing, so I’m out.

Quote from: Seafire on 04/07/2022 00:54:25
I wish I could say the same :'(
Whatever

4
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Why can't i understand the andromeda paradox?
« on: Yesterday at 17:12:57 »
Quote from: paul cotter on Yesterday at 16:24:22
I can follow your reasoning explicitly, however I can't grasp the concept, if that makes any sense. Bottom line: I think I have covid too.
Yes, I can see you are thinking how can you answer the little voice in the back seat saying “are we there yet?”

Get well soon and I’m sure the brain fog will clear, but we might need to take a step back and examine how you first came to terms with the fact that there is no absolute spatial reference.

5
Just Chat! / Re: The coronation of "eternal student", why was i not invited?
« on: Yesterday at 11:00:38 »
Quote from: paul cotter on Yesterday at 10:13:00
I just noticed this morning that "eternal student" has been crowned with the regal title "naked science forum king", a most auspicious honour that he(she) did not desire.
I think he views it more as a suspicious honour

Quote from: paul cotter on Yesterday at 10:13:00
Regardless of that, why did I not receive an invitation to the coronation ceremony and the subsequent food and drink debauch?
The peasantry are not usually invited to these events. It’s only people like Alan who are sufficiently skilled at débauching - it takes years of dedicated practice


6
Just Chat! / Re: What is the value of spam?
« on: 04/07/2022 22:25:05 »
Quote from: paul cotter on 04/07/2022 17:23:27
….but these are proper ads, would these be classed as spam?
The rules here expressly forbid unsolicited advertising, so yes we view them as spam
Many of the ads we remove are links to porn, prostitution and gambling sites. The objective of the poster is to get people to click and so up the search rating of the site, as well as drawing in the susceptible.

7
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: How does special relativity explain dimensional components ...
« on: 04/07/2022 16:52:52 »



Quote from: Dimensional on 04/07/2022 00:49:41
I think this is outside of the scope of Galilean relativity because nothing is actually moving in GR.  GR implies a block universe. 

So the idea of an object to be moving relative to another object doesn't really make any sense in a block universe.
I think @Eternal Student  has answered this, but some personal views.
I tend to think of General Relativity (GR) as a chart such as used by a ship navigator. S/he can plot the ship’s current, past and future positions in both space and time, but it doesn’t imply that the ship still exists at all those positions. Alternatively you can think of your sat nav which shows your current position and past and future - compatible with a moving spotlight view of time.
Galilean Relativity is most definitely about movement and different views of that movement, but in no way does it imply different universes. If I’m watching a road race from one side of a road I might describe the competitors as moving left to right, whereas someone on the other side of the road would say right to left. One universe two viewpoints.

8
Just Chat! / Re: Unique Gifts
« on: 04/07/2022 13:45:16 »
Quote from: Suckstobebroke on 04/07/2022 13:31:32
How Can I buy some different and unique gifts online in the USA?
Welcome to the forum.
You are asking in the wrong forum, you need a shopping site or look on your local web. Any replies here will be treated as spam and removed
You could of course ask Sarah Williams

9
Question of the Week / MOVED: Unique Gifts
« on: 04/07/2022 13:43:29 »
This topic has been moved to Just Chat!.

https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=85083.0

10
General Science / Re: What caused rope to spin while pulling stuff 6 stories up?
« on: 03/07/2022 23:16:34 »
Quote from: jfoldbar on 03/07/2022 18:26:43
from the underneath side looking up, the scaffold spun clockwise.
That would make sense. Most ropes of this sort are 3 strand with a right hand lay. This means that in construction the rope is tightened by twisting the end anticlockwise, so when it is stretched (as described by @Bored chemist ) it will untwist clockwise when viewed from below.

11
General Science / Re: Are space and time just two sides of the same coin?
« on: 03/07/2022 16:59:06 »

Might be time to take a pause and look at some basics here because I think there are some misunderstandings.

Minor point. Ideas generally come before models, but not always. Take eg of Copernicus, before him the idea was that the sun orbited the earth. The top mathematicians of the day, the Arabic scholars, struggled to find a model that worked with this idea. Copernicus came up with a different idea, that the earth orbits the sun from which a model of the planetary system could be developed.

Quote from: Seafire on 30/06/2022 01:37:06
Perhaps you're still convinced that movement needs a time dimension to facilitate it but are unwilling to stand up for your conviction.  ;)
That depends what you mean by dimension and what you mean by facilitate.
Physics defines seven primary dimensions: length, mass, time, temperature, electric current, amount of light, and amount of matter. I suspect you would only consider one of those to be a dimension, that’s because the common usage of dimension is very different from the physics usage.
Facilitate movement? Certainly we know that any movement has a start position and time, and an end position and time (physics calls these points events and there are an infinite number of such events between start and finish). Whether you consider time to facilitate that movement is debatable, but I would say not. For example, we measure the temperature dimension, but it would be unusual to suggest that the dimension facilitates temperature. Temperature is facilitated by other causes, we just measure the effect.

Quote from: Seafire on 30/06/2022 01:37:06
The idea that there is a past, present and future is speculation when all we know is the present. I remember where objects were before they moved (past), and I can predict where objects will be after they move (future) but memory and prediction of movement is far from being evidence of a time dimension. This is a mistake and one that is rearly admitted.
I’m not sure who you think rarely admits it. I would agree if you are talking about the general population, but physicists (and philosophers) frequently debate this area. Your view is a form of temporal presentism, but there are many other options including block universe. So, you have nailed your colours to a particular wall, some would agree with you, but there are others who would say you are wrong to do so.
I tend to think in terms of a dynamic view of time. Do I believe that somewhere in spacetime Anne Boleyn is still being executed, or WWII is still being acted out, no. However, I would never be as arrogant as to say that my view is correct and all other views wrong.
@Halc has probably looked at all the different philosophies, but I suspect your accusatory tone might have put him off further discussion.

Quote from: Seafire on 01/07/2022 18:15:00
…….as long as you remember they are just imaginary.
Imaginary has a different meaning in physics to common usage. It does not equate to not real, as in unicorns are not real.

Quote from: Seafire on 03/07/2022 03:25:47
Quote from: Origin on 02/07/2022 12:17:38
I understand you for some reason don't like that time is a dimension,
Pesky empirical evidence. :o
If you can devise an experiment that will provide unequivocal empirical evidence of your idea, then you will be in line for a Nobel prize. The reason there is so much debate and varying views in this area is because there is no empirical evidence.
There is, however, a lot of evidence that our common sense view of distance is affected by relative movement, and that what is the past for me might in some circumstances be the present for someone else. Distance is also affected by gravitational potential, so 2 people at different heights above the earth could disagree on vertical measurements.
Experiments in particle accelerators also tell us that distance is not what our ‘common sense’ might suggest.

Quote from: Seafire on 03/07/2022 03:25:47
I want to meet you at Joe's in 10 unicorns, of course we will have to set up a convention for one unicorn like the swing of a pendulum or the movement of the sun, however we won't need to set up a convention for the spatial dimensions because they actually exist and we can measure them directly.
As Origin points out, you are confusing units with dimensions.
Hours and unicorns are units and arrived at by convention, so are distance units.
Also, there are many things we cannot measure directly, but that doesn’t mean they don’t exist.
Interestingly there are many people who have a very good sense of time and can tell to within 15mins what time it is, and musicians have a very good time sense otherwise there would be no consistent rhythm.

All in all this is quite a complex subject, but I’m glad you are taking the time to think about it.

12
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: 02/07/2022 07:54:20 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 01/07/2022 17:34:28
Quote from: yor_on on 01/07/2022 10:07:43
Then we have temperatures and green house gasses as carbon dioxide, each one limiting your crop yields.
Indeed. Local market gardeners add CO2 to their greenhouses (never mind 400 ppm - these guys go for a toxic 1 - 5%) to maximise crop yields. Forestry officers around the world have noticed steadily improved tree growth over the last 150 years.

Certainly CO2 is a plant growth promoter. In the Early Carboniferous, global atmospheric carbon dioxide levels were around 1,500 parts per million, astronomical in comparison to modern values and was part of the reason for such large plants. The plants pumped oxygen into the atmosphere in large concentrations, and carbon dioxide started to be locked into our, now, coal & oil seams.  Carbon dioxide levels were down to around 350 parts per million by the Middle Carboniferous and the high plant growth reduced.

13
Chemistry / Re: Phase Transfer Catalyst(PTC)
« on: 01/07/2022 08:37:51 »
Please amend your post title as a question and ask a science question in the first post
Thank you

14
Chemistry / Re: Importance Pharmaceutical And Chemical Industries
« on: 01/07/2022 08:37:09 »
Please amend your post title as a question and ask a science question in the first post
Thank you

15
Technology / Re: What Question Could You Ask To Determine Sentience Of An AI ?
« on: 30/06/2022 21:53:29 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 30/06/2022 18:59:51
The fun question to ask of an AI system is whether it could design a tool that would allow it to do something it isn't already designed to do.
I seem to recall that there has been an attempt to patent an invention in the name of an AI. I must check, but I think British patent office said only people can be named as inventor, but somewhere else allowed it.

I’m thinking of retraining as an AI psychologist. As there can’t be that many around I ought to be able to train myself.

16
Just Chat! / Re: FAULT on the website?
« on: 30/06/2022 16:28:14 »
I'll have a look

17
Just Chat! / Re: FAULT on the website?
« on: 30/06/2022 13:52:25 »
What size of post are you working on?

18
Technology / Re: What Question Could You Ask To Determine Sentience Of An AI ?
« on: 29/06/2022 23:00:07 »
Quote from: neilep on 29/06/2022 12:25:38
seems that there's a hurdle of definitions which need to be agreed before one can even ask the question i.e. agree on the definition of the question ?
We even need to agree what the answers might mean.
Putting aside the obvious question “do androids dream of electric sheep” we might ask whether the réponse from AI could be interpreted as in any way similar to our experience of consciousness.
Take the fear of death=fear of being turned off or erased. The AI might say it fears being erased, but for us fear is a combination of effects, adrenaline, anxiety, increased heart rate etc which the AI will not experience. So is it saying it fears death as a genuine fear (whatever that means) or just responding in a way that the average person might ie giving an expected response.
It might be worth starting with an easier question, such as is a sheep sentient and what question would you ask to determine that state?

19
General Science / Re: How much of me is original?
« on: 29/06/2022 22:13:57 »
Quote from: Harri on 29/06/2022 21:14:17
I know my dna remains the same
I wouldn’t be so sure about that. DNA does mutate as it passes from cell to cell and we age.

Quote from: Harri on 29/06/2022 21:14:17
For instance, will any of the original heart I was born with remain with me now?
I would say not a lot, if any, of the original cells. Usual quoted cell replacement is between 7 & 10 years, but can be shorter for important organs.

20
New Theories / Re: An essay in futility, too long to read :)
« on: 29/06/2022 22:05:58 »


Quote from: yor_on on 27/06/2022 21:36:49
If Mr Putin has expressed it that way, I would say he's correct. It reminds me very much of a gang of bullies in the schoolyard, fighting and threatening, and then onlookers, unsure of whom to cheer.
When I was at school the bullies were often the bigger, older boys who would pick on the weaker newcomers. Either you had something they wanted or just didn’t like the way you looked, talked etc.
Generally this tactic of aggression worked, but occasionally they misjudged the strength of an assumed weaker opponent and got a bloody nose. Or friends of the victim rallied round to provide a defence.
These defenders were never considered bullies, but protectors of the weak. The thing that defined the bully was that they used violence first.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 282
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.148 seconds with 69 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.