0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 24/02/2018 19:21:16Quote from: Thebox on 24/02/2018 18:30:47Explain how a ''free'' electron can retain form ? I don't need to explain why your made up nonsense is wrong.You are the one claiming it is nonsense and wrong, therefore an explanation is required to justify your statement. Saying something is wrong without explanation is subjective and not very truthful. Are you afraid that if you answer my questions truthfully it would re-enforce my notion? I do not need you to re-enforce my notion, I already understand it is credible.
Quote from: Thebox on 24/02/2018 18:30:47Explain how a ''free'' electron can retain form ? I don't need to explain why your made up nonsense is wrong.
Explain how a ''free'' electron can retain form ?
Well, time dilation does not happen quite the way science think it happens, so technically I was correct.
I have cited things that show that isolated electrons exist.
Quote from: Thebox on 24/02/2018 20:57:27Well, time dilation does not happen quite the way science think it happens, so technically I was correct.Yes, the consensus of the scientific community is wrong because some guy whose only science experience comes from talking on message boards said so. Someone who does not have a degree in physics, who does not have a job as a scientist and who has no means to conduct tests of his hypotheses clearly knows more than actual scientists do...
Quote from: Bored chemist on 24/02/2018 21:03:46I have cited things that show that isolated electrons exist.I have cited things that show why an isolated electron can exist in a n-field. I used Plasma bottling as an example.
Why do you keep making this sh1t up?
I am saying science is more than right, I am just finishing the details.
Quote from: Thebox on 24/02/2018 21:11:43I am saying science is more than right, I am just finishing the details. Yet you reject many scientific findings, either because you don't understand them or because they contradict your hypotheses. So what you are actually saying is, "science is right so long as it agrees with me".
Spacial n-fields bottle single free electrons.
I have understood relativity, defined time to a precise definition keeping inline with time dilation. I have described gravity based on present information.
Reject? I have understood relativity, defined time to a precise definition keeping inline with time dilation. I have described gravity based on present information. I have strengthened science not weakened it.
You have denied the way that basic orbital mechanics works.
I have answered how the fabric of space and space-time works.
As for the other you mentioned, my theory does not ''care'' about that , because my theory is a new theory and different than present set naive theory.
Spacial n-fields bottle single free electrons.That's exactly the kind of made-up sh1t I meant.Quote from: Thebox on Today at 06:18:36
The current theory works.Yours is different.
I have answered how the fabric of space and space-time works. As for the other you mentioned, my theory does not ''care'' about that , because my theory is a new theory and different than present set naive theory.
singleton set
My theory is different, but my theory also works and shows some of your theory cannot work. That's the problem my friend.
Quote from: Thebox on 25/02/2018 15:50:56I have answered how the fabric of space and space-time works. As for the other you mentioned, my theory does not ''care'' about that , because my theory is a new theory and different than present set naive theory. It had better "care", because (as I have pointed out in other threads) there are subatomic particles which do not have a trace of electric charge yet they have mass. So any hypothesis that proposes that mass and gravity are caused by electric charge has to be wrong.