0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: profound on 27/09/2017 20:57:31It's the wrong shape.For it to work it MUST be a sphere.Oh dear! the Sun just went out because it's not a sphere.Oh! false alarm; it's just that Profound is talking bollocks.
It's the wrong shape.For it to work it MUST be a sphere.
Quote from: profound on 27/09/2017 21:03:25how are photons going to travel from the plasma through the opaque containment vessel?They don't need to.They will reach it, be absorbed and warm it up.Then you can harvest that heat, boil water make steam and turn a turbine to make electricity.Perhaps you should "just admit you are making excuses for a" dead end successful engineering design which should be cancelled and replaced with a spherical containment fusion design. upgraded."
how are photons going to travel from the plasma through the opaque containment vessel?
Thais what I said.ITER will never produce net energy.
heat radiation is not called photons..that is normally reserved for visible light....you should have said heat or e - m radiation.
in any case how are you going to wrap an heat exchanger around an container ALREADY encased by magnetic field coils which cannot be disturbed?
In my theory, the strong force is gravity.
My theory works... The strong force is gravity and it is confined in particles because gravity is not produced from a point but from a circle. If you have two concentric circles with a distance of a planck length separating them, using wavelength as circumferences for mass energy and half charges separated by the diameter, you find that the ratio of the electromagnetic energy divided by the gravitational energy is the fine structure constant.
Quote from: profound on 27/09/2017 22:03:17heat radiation is not called photons..that is normally reserved for visible light....you should have said heat or e - m radiation.Much of the emission from the initial fusion reaction is carried by gamma ray photons, but thanks for making it clear that you don't know what you are talking about.Quote from: profound on 27/09/2017 22:03:17in any case how are you going to wrap an heat exchanger around an container ALREADY encased by magnetic field coils which cannot be disturbed?Why would I need to?Spoiler alert:The walls may already have cooling pipes.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 27/09/2017 22:23:50Quote from: profound on 27/09/2017 22:03:17heat radiation is not called photons..that is normally reserved for visible light....you should have said heat or e - m radiation.Much of the emission from the initial fusion reaction is carried by gamma ray photons, but thanks for making it clear that you don't know what you are talking about.Quote from: profound on 27/09/2017 22:03:17in any case how are you going to wrap an heat exchanger around an container ALREADY encased by magnetic field coils which cannot be disturbed?Why would I need to?Spoiler alert:The walls may already have cooling pipes.You can't have cooling pipes as any fluid flow would disturb the very delicate magnetic fields.See? i have an answer for everything.More bad news for you. Some people actually listened to me a few years ago and are building a spherical containment chamber.See? I win again.
you find that the ratio of the electromagnetic energy divided by the gravitational energy is the fine structure constant.
The Planck Mass is around 10-19 of the proton mass.
Quote from: profound on 30/09/2017 21:48:30Quote from: Bored chemist on 27/09/2017 22:23:50Quote from: profound on 27/09/2017 22:03:17heat radiation is not called photons..that is normally reserved for visible light....you should have said heat or e - m radiation.Much of the emission from the initial fusion reaction is carried by gamma ray photons, but thanks for making it clear that you don't know what you are talking about.Quote from: profound on 27/09/2017 22:03:17in any case how are you going to wrap an heat exchanger around an container ALREADY encased by magnetic field coils which cannot be disturbed?Why would I need to?Spoiler alert:The walls may already have cooling pipes.You can't have cooling pipes as any fluid flow would disturb the very delicate magnetic fields.See? i have an answer for everything.More bad news for you. Some people actually listened to me a few years ago and are building a spherical containment chamber.See? I win again.As has been pointed out, all plasma systems are intrinsically unstable, so there will need a control system.So any tiny influences from the cooling system will be dealt with by that controller."Some people actually listened to me a few years ago and are building a spherical containment chamber."That's not bad news for me.Spherical vacuum chambers are commonplace for obvious mechanical reasons.How are they going to add and remove power in an exactly spherically symmetric manner?Because if they don't, you just shot down your own argument.
Well it seems people listened to me a few years ago when I posted in various physics forums involved in fusion research and they have built it.The spherical tokamak has a number of advantages over the standard tokamak design. It offers the promise of achieving fusion with cheaper construction costs and lessened energy demands. Results achieved so far indicate it would be a good design for a fusion power reactor, still using conventional deuterium and tritium fuel.http://www.ialtenergy.com/spherical-tokamak.htmlDon't feel too sad.
Quote from: profound on 07/10/2017 20:45:19Well it seems people listened to me a few years ago when I posted in various physics forums involved in fusion research and they have built it.The spherical tokamak has a number of advantages over the standard tokamak design. It offers the promise of achieving fusion with cheaper construction costs and lessened energy demands. Results achieved so far indicate it would be a good design for a fusion power reactor, still using conventional deuterium and tritium fuel.http://www.ialtenergy.com/spherical-tokamak.htmlDon't feel too sad.Now, even if you overlook the fact that the word says it's torroidal, there's still the issue of the magnetic field.The only way to get that spherical is to have a magnetic monople at the centre.Did you understand the bit where I wrote this"Spherical vacuum chambers are commonplace for obvious mechanical reasons."
Quote from: Bored chemist on 08/10/2017 16:52:40Quote from: profound on 07/10/2017 20:45:19Well it seems people listened to me a few years ago when I posted in various physics forums involved in fusion research and they have built it.The spherical tokamak has a number of advantages over the standard tokamak design. It offers the promise of achieving fusion with cheaper construction costs and lessened energy demands. Results achieved so far indicate it would be a good design for a fusion power reactor, still using conventional deuterium and tritium fuel.http://www.ialtenergy.com/spherical-tokamak.htmlDon't feel too sad.Now, even if you overlook the fact that the word says it's torroidal, there's still the issue of the magnetic field.The only way to get that spherical is to have a magnetic monople at the centre.Did you understand the bit where I wrote this"Spherical vacuum chambers are commonplace for obvious mechanical reasons."Wrong again.START proved Peng and Strickler's predictions; the ST had performance an order of magnitude better than conventional designs, and cost much less to build as well. In terms of overall economics, the ST was an enormous step forward.Moreover, the ST was a new approach, and a low-cost one. It was one of the few areas of mainline fusion research where real contributions could be made on small budgets. This sparked off a series of ST developments around the world. In particular, the National Spherical Torus Experiment (NSTX) and Pegasus experiments in the US, Globus-M in Russia, and the UK's follow-on to START, MAST. START itself found new life as part of the Proto-Sphera project in Italy, where experimenters are attempting to eliminate the central column by passing the current through a secondary plasma.[25]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_tokamakhttp://www.frascati.enea.it/ProtoSphera/Multi-Pinch_Status/index_Multi-Pinch_Status.htm
hydrogen + gravitational compression work (E) = xelijum !There is no H (deuterium, tritium) = Xe + EBut goes H (deuterium, tritium) = Xe-EIt's such a simple theory! I.T. E.R. Is the wrong shape,and big mistake.