Post by: paul cotter on 05/07/2022 12:30:50
Post by: Halc on 05/07/2022 12:50:06
Two observersCareful about this wording. Nobody is observing anything in the Andromeda scenario. It is just a reference to two different inertial frames which differ by perhaps a walking pace.
Quote
Two observers speculate on a distant(spatially+temporally) eventA pair of spatially distant events. Since one each distant event is simultaneous with the respective observer event, neither is temporally distant.
Quote
with contradictory opinionsThe 'opinions' are just statements of simultaneity relative to mildly different frames, and as such are not contradictory, which is why this isn't an actual paradox. The scenario does not involve empirical measurements of any kind.
Quote
A could be correct with B incorrect or B could be correct with A incorrect.They're both correct. Neither says anything that contradicts the other.
Quote
There will always be uncertainty about future events-what am I missing?There is no mention of a future event here. Both A&B are making statements about a current event, something that cannot be measured since one can only measure something in the past if it has any spatial separation from you.
So relative to frame A, the Andromedons have not yet decided to make this attack, and relative to frame B, the Andromedons are currently in flight with their battle fleet. Neither statement contradicts the other.
This only seems paradoxical since one's intuitions tend to assume absolute simultaneity where simultaneity is not frame dependent, and thus the above statement reduces to: The Andromedons have not yet decided to make this attack and the Andromedons are currently in flight with their battle fleet. That statement is contradictory, but under SR, it is not even wrong since it lacks frame references.
Post by: Eternal Student on 05/07/2022 12:52:43
Hope you are well. This is is obviously one of the most interesting posts available today. I have a strong suspicion that @Halc is about to write a post since the forum is reporting him as viewing this post at the moment. He obviously has a head start over me, so I'm just going to wait and see what gets done.
For the short term, I'm just going to glance through some YT videos that might exist and see if I can recommend one.
Best Wishes.
Post by: Eternal Student on 05/07/2022 13:09:10
Well done @Halc . I also can't find a good YT video for the Andromeda Paradox. There are videos but none of them great. If anyone else knows of a good YT video that would be of interest to me (even if no one else).
This might be something we explain from first principles.
Best Wishes.
Post by: paul cotter on 05/07/2022 14:28:07
Post by: Eternal Student on 05/07/2022 15:00:42
Well look, here's the thing from first principles...
Start with a person called Paul on planet earth. For ease of notation and calculation we will set up an inertial reference frame S with co-ordinates (space, time) = (x,t) . We'll only need one spatial dimension (just choose a Cartesian frame so that planet earth and the Andromeda galaxy lie along the x-axis). We'll have Paul stationary in the frame S and, as usual, we'll put him at the origin.
To keep it all simple, we'll have the Andromeda galaxy at a distance of 3 million light years from earth and we'll have it remain stationary in the frame S. (In reality it's about 2.5 million light years away and you probably know it's on a collision course - none of that's necessary for the Andromeda Paradox, we just need it at a large distance).
Let's draw a spacetime diagram now and put some important worldlines on it.
Andromeda1.png (12.8 kB . 1304x767 - viewed 6004 times)Since Paul and the Andromeda Galaxy are stationary in this frame, their worldlines run parallel to the t axis. Paul's is precisely along the t-axis.
Now the general idea is that there are some Aliens living in the Andromeda galaxy and they will decide to invade earth. Let's mark some important events on the spacetime diagram. Event (xA, tm ) = where and when the Andromedans have a meeting to consider invading Earth. Event (xA , tL ) = where and when the Andromedans launch the invasion fleet.
Paul considers events lying along the x-axis to be events occurring at time t = 0, or "right now". So, for Paul, the Andromedans are having a meeting to decide if they will invade.
Andromeda2.png (12.89 kB . 1304x767 - viewed 6018 times)Now Paul has a friend, let's call them Bicycle Brenda, who is riding a bicycle past Paul at a low speed and just happens to be travelling toward the Andromeda Galaxy. So Let's consider how Brenda sees the universe next...
This is just standard stuff in Special Relativity, Brenda sees Paul looking slightly thinner than if he was at rest, this is length contraction etc. However, since the speed of Brenda relative to Paul is so small, it's not like this really matters or is significant. Anyway, the easiest way to determine how Brenda sees the world is to construct another inertial frame around Brenda where she is the one at rest at the origin. We'll set up a second frame S' in which Brenda is at rest and at the origin. We'll synchronise the times t and t' = 0 when Paul and Brenda are precisely at the same place (I'll say just passing each other but for the Mathematics it will fine if Brenda has ridden right through Paul at the event t=t'=0 and x=x'=0). Anyway, the frames S with co-ordinates (x,t) and S' with co-ordinates (x',t') are just Lorentz boosts of each other as usual, with a tiny off-set velocity v = bicycle speed = 2 mph.
We need the Lorentz transformations to see how the events in S are mapped to events in S', we'll just focus on the time coordinate t'
t' =
You can check this equation yourself, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_transformation , for example. Spend a moment and remind yourself how this equation can be used. Given an event with values (x,t) specified in the frame S, this equation determines the t' value that would be assigned to the corresponding event in frame S'. We could determine the corresponding x' value with another equation - but we won't need that for this example.
Brenda considers all events in the universe to be happening "right now" if and only they have t' coordinate = 0 in the frame S'. They can have any x' co-ordinate (that just tells her how far away the events are in space), just so long as t' =0 (that means they are happening at t'=0 or right now, where "now" means when Brenda passed Paul and said "Hi!" or "Sorry I just ran you over" etc).
We want to mark all the events on our spacetime diagram that are happening right now for Brenda. However, our spacetime diagram only has an axis marked up for the frame S.
Set t'=0 in the above Lorentz transformation equation and determine the set of all events (described with co-ordinates x,t in S) that are happening "right now" for Brenda, that's what we will mark on our diagram.
From the Lorentz transformation equation we obtain:
0 = t' =
≠ 0 , so divide , re-arrange and obtain t' = 0 <=> t =
On the R.H.S. we have the relationship between t and x (the co-ordinates in S that describe events happening now throughout the universe for Brenda.
v = small positive value = bicycle speed in S and it's in the +ve x direction.
c2 = a massive number.
v/c2 is therefore a tiny positive number. t = (v/c2) . x describes a straight line on the diagram that is almost parallel to the x-axis. However the key is that it is NOT quite parallel to the x-axis, it is angled upward a tiny bit. Moreover the Andromeda galaxy is a long way along the x-axis, so let's put this line of constant t' on our spacetime diagram and see what happens.....
Andromeda3.png (16.34 kB . 1304x767 - viewed 6023 times)The Green line shows all the events throughout the universe that are happening now (t'=0) for Brenda.
Hopefully you can see that, as far as Brenda is concerned, when she passed Paul and said "Hi!" the invasion from Andromeda has been launched. Meanwhile, for Paul the meeting to decide whether to invade Earth or not hasn't finished yet.
Anyway, I hope that will help to see the gist of the argument for the Andromeda paradox.
As @Halc mentioned earlier, you need to be carefull not to say, Brenda "sees" the invasion has been launched. There's no way light has reached Brenda's eyes yet, she isn't going to "see" the ships coming. It's only that the launch is actually happening now for Brenda even though there is no practical way she could know. So, for example, she couldn't tell Paul that it was coming.... unless she has some extra-sensory perception and says "you know, it's funny but every time I ride my bike in that direction I just feel like some invasion has been launched". In which case Paul would reply, "have you tried changing to a lower gear? You might be getting yourself a little out of breath and dizzy".
Best Wishes.
Post by: Eternal Student on 05/07/2022 15:12:15
Eternal student, I hope you are well, you did mention the dreaded covid.Yes, I'm much better today, thanks. Nearly running at normal temperature - if my earlier posts were still a bit weird then that will be why. I'll still be stuck at home for a while since I'm now caring for family members who are a few days behind me in the progression of the disease. We're all vaccinated and not especially vulnerable to respiratory problems, so it should all be OK.
Best Wishes.
Post by: Halc on 05/07/2022 16:02:05
Halc, I would argue that the two participants have contradictory positions: one says the decision has not been made yet and the other says the fleet is in transit already.Yes,l those statements are contradictory, but neither of them says those things. Both statements presume absolute simultaneity by their omission of frame references, and it can easily be shown that neither postulate of special relativity can be true if the premise of absolute simultaneity (an intuitive assumption) is taken.
Part of the confusion is the statement of something not measured: 'The Andromedons are considering whether to attack' for instance is not something that anybody has measured. It is simply an abstract statement, a description of the scenario in question by the narrator so to speak. No observer can measure this, certainly not A and B. Likewise, if Andromedons are somehow considering an attack on Earth, it isn't against humans since there's no way they could have yet measured a species yet to have evolved. We are no more fact to an Andromedon obesrver than they are fact to us.
Post by: paul cotter on 05/07/2022 16:24:22
Post by: paul cotter on 05/07/2022 16:27:12
Post by: Eternal Student on 05/07/2022 16:31:28
No worries @paul cotter , rest up and get well soon.
Best Wishes.
Post by: alancalverd on 05/07/2022 17:08:38
as far as Brenda is concerned, when she passed Paul and said "Hi!" the invasion from Andromeda has been launched. Meanwhile, for Paul the meeting to decide whether to invade Earth or not hasn't finished yet.When did you become a Downing Street spokesman? ;)
Post by: Colin2B on 05/07/2022 17:12:57
I can follow your reasoning explicitly, however I can't grasp the concept, if that makes any sense. Bottom line: I think I have covid too.Yes, I can see you are thinking how can you answer the little voice in the back seat saying “are we there yet?”
Get well soon and I’m sure the brain fog will clear, but we might need to take a step back and examine how you first came to terms with the fact that there is no absolute spatial reference.
Post by: Eternal Student on 05/07/2022 17:17:06
I've still been looking for a good YT video. I can't find one but this one seems close enough and reliable.
It's an extract from "The Fabric of the Cosmos The Illusion of Time", featuring Brian Greene. That seems to be a paid-for documentary but there's a 9-minute section of it on You Tube for free. (I don't know if it should be there, someone else put it there and I'm going to guess Google would have removed it if they should have done).
The section between 3:54 and the end (approx. 9:40) presents the ideas (without any mathematics) that suggest a block universe.
That's something you could watch and not need to worry about or concentrate on too much.
Best Wishes.
Post by: Dimensional on 05/07/2022 17:42:12
Quote
Two people pass each other on the street; and according to one of the two people, an Andromedean space fleet has already set off on its journey, while to the other, the decision as to whether or not the journey will actually take place has not yet been made. How can there still be some uncertainty as to the outcome of that decision? If to either person the decision has already been made, then surely there cannot be any uncertainty. The launching of the space fleet is an inevitability. In fact neither of the people can yet know of the launching of the space fleet. They can know only later, when telescopic observations from Earth reveal that the fleet is indeed on its way. Then they can hark back to that chance encounter, and come to the conclusion that at that time, according to one of them, the decision lay in the uncertain future, while to the other, it lay in the certain past. Was there then any uncertainty about that future? Or was the future of both people already "fixed"?
— Roger Penrose, The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics
I understand that this says nothing about this being a physical paradox especially when considering a block universe. But it is Penrose saying this, so I am trying to understand what he thinks is paradoxical.
Does anyone understand what he might be getting at?
Post by: Eternal Student on 05/07/2022 19:40:42
There's nothing literally "paradoxical", it's just meant to make you think about or re-consider a few things: How you imagine time; how uncertain the future might be and if events do disappear or cease to exist once they are in the past; and similarly if events in the future don't exist yet.
It might help if you consider the situation from Andromeda. Instead of you and your friend being on Earth and walking past each other, consider an Andromedon called Andrea and her friend, Billy-Andrew, walking past her on the streets of a planet in the Andromedon galaxy.
Now you are still you on planet Earth. As a sensible human being you would assume that you have a freedom of choice about whether to invade Andromeda. According to Andrea, you are currently making a decision about whether you should go to war against the Andromedons. According to Billy-Andrew, the decision has already been made and the Earth fleets are on their way.
Now, just consider yourself on planet Earth, at the moment when you are deciding whether or not to go to war. Is it possible that you can decide not to go to war against the Andromedons? As an ordinary human being you would imagine this is still undecided, the future invasion is not determined, that future does not exist yet. However, for Billy-Andrew your decision has already been made and the invasion has been launched. If you can and do decide not to go to war, then that should be the events of the present for Billy-Andrew.
There are two, slightly separate issues, that might raise concern for us (human beings):
1. That events which are in our future actually exist in the present for at least one of the aliens.
2. That we (human beings) didn't actually seem to have any freedom of choice - the results of our decisions are in the aliens present (provided we select an alien far enough away and moving the right way). Indeed it was not possible for you to have reached any other decision.
The Free Will concerns are, naturally, of considerable interest in Philosophy but not directly relevant to the notion of a Block Universe.
The idea marked 1. - that events in your future actually exist as events in the present for an alien is all we need to start supporting the notion of a block universe. We can show (just by having the alien move in the other direction), that events in your past are also equally real and exist. They are happening right now, in the present, for that alien.
There's no especially good reason to decide that an event "existing" must or should be demonstrably shown to be an event that is happening now or "in the present" for someone. However, that is one reasonable way to show that an event "exists". For example, someone can argue that all you know is that there are some events happening around you now, that's all you can be certain exists.
Best Wishes.
Post by: paul cotter on 08/07/2022 12:43:11
Post by: Eternal Student on 08/07/2022 15:11:53
I'm glad you're getting better @paul cotter .
A higher speed of one participant would give a greater slope to your green line.Yes, that's absolutely correct. However, that's not where the emphasis is usually placed.
The emphasis is usually put on the massive distance between Earth and the Andromeda galaxy. As such even a tiny slope on the green line results in a huge difference in deciding which event is happening now in Andromeda.
So, the common development of the Andromeda paradox is that even if you did something like just turn or shake your head in different directions, that slow movement is important when magnified over huge distances. It's an effect of special relativity that doesn't require space rockets and travel at speeds close to that of light etc.
Best Wishes.
Post by: Colin2B on 08/07/2022 15:15:45
My malfunctioning engineering brain viewed the two frames as being sufficiently similar as to consider them equivalent.As @Halc points out, Penrose is taking a presentist view and a Newtonian one at that. I think he is trying to show how the man in the street might view it by assuming the 2 participants share a common present - and in everyday life it is a good approximation.
One thing he mentions is often misunderstood by some visitors here. They assume relativity is the result of the time taken for light to travel from event to observer rather than that effect being an add on. He explains that information about the Andromedian fleet can only be accessed at the speed of light, so neither of the parties on earth can have knowledge of what is happening, on their present time slice, in Andromeda.
Edit: whoops, collision with ES. Different points however
Post by: GaryMason on 21/07/2022 20:57:10
I am totally confused too. Here is the original quote from Penrose (taken from Wikipedia),Nope, I'm also out of his meanings, thus I have understood smth about andromeda and at the end I messed up on this messageQuoteTwo people pass each other on the street; and according to one of the two people...I understand that this says nothing about this being a physical paradox especially when considering a block universe. But it is Penrose saying this, so I am trying to understand what he thinks is paradoxical.
Does anyone understand what he might be getting at?
Post by: MikeFontenot on 06/08/2022 19:15:15
[...]
If anyone else knows of a good YT video that would be of interest [...]
Brian Greene, on his Nova show, explains it very well. Scan forward to the 22:30 point, and watch until the 25:40 point:
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/video/the-fabric-of-the-cosmos-the-illusion-of-time/
Post by: paul cotter on 27/08/2022 16:31:34
Post by: Halc on 27/08/2022 16:38:51
Quick question, halc. How can you falsify the concept of an afterlife?You die. If you find yourself in hell or whatever, you can't send the test results back to Earth, but you've proved it at least to yourself and anyone you took with you.
Admittedly if there isn't one, there's no you to whom the lack of afterlife has been demonstrated.
Ditto with a non-block absolute time interpretation of physics. Jump into a large black hole. If you find yourself in there, you can look at Earth but you can't send the message "Einstein was right!" to them, but you've proved it at least to yourself and anyone you took with you. If the preferred frame interpretation is true, time ends at the event horizon and there's no you to whom the lack of block universe has been demonstrated.
Post by: ArthurArts on 15/02/2023 14:44:51
Post by: Halc on 15/02/2023 18:39:44
Could you elaborate on why it is impossible to keep all the clocks in the array stationary for an accelerating observer, even with knowledge of the acceleration schedule?Given a pattern of acceleration (especially one that isn't constant), the lines of simultaneity at time 0 and at time 1 will not be parallel, and thus will cross at some location in space. Anything beyond that point (the Rindler horizon https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rindler_coordinates (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rindler_coordinates)) would require the object to be at different locations at a given time or to have to move at greater than light speed to remain at the same location relative to the reference thing accelerating.
So for instance, one observer might accelerate at 1g for 10 seconds and then 'coast'. The lines of simultaneity in the inertial frames before and after the acceleration cross about a light year away in the direction away from the acceleration vector. This means that if I have a light-year long pre-stressed rocket, no amount of thrust applied at the rear can cause the front of the rocket to accelerate at 1g or more. I say pre-stressed so one doesn't have to wait a year for the thrust at the rear to be felt at the front. A building for instance is pre-stressed since it isn't built in free fall and then suddenly placed on the ground.
Post by: Eternal Student on 28/02/2023 03:28:29
Sorry, I've been away and/or missed some comments that are now quite old.
Post #20 @MikeFontenot did recommend a video as I requested some time ago. Thank you. Unfortunately it looks like a paid-for subscription service, so I haven't seen it but I'm sure it was suitable. Thanks. The remainder of this thread looks old and completed.
Best Wishes.
Post by: Eternal Student on 20/03/2023 00:40:08
I'm sorry but maybe you do have a subscription to PBS or NOVA or whatever it is. I get asked to type in my log-in details, skipping or closing that and you get this:
[ Invalid Attachment ]
Best Wishes.
Post by: Halc on 20/03/2023 01:48:46
I'm sorry but maybe you do have a subscription to PBS or NOVA or whatever it is. I get asked to type in my log-in details, skipping or closing that and you get ...Funny, I had no trouble, even back when the link was first posted. It asked for my email, but I dismissed that and the video was there.
It's a good visual aid, but nothing above and beyond so to speak.
They use a loaf of bread to represent spacetime and then slice it a different arbitrary 'angles of simultaneity'.
Then it illustrates the implications of that using something like the Andromeda paradox, except from the point of view of the distant alien (on a bicycle) rather than using our PoV. I like that variation since I think it drives the point home better.
Post by: Eternal Student on 03/04/2023 22:51:22
Thanks for checking the video and describing it, @Halc
It sounds like the one previously mentioned in post #13.
Best Wishes.