The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Profile of Yahya A.Sharif
  3. Show Posts
  4. Topics
  • Profile Info
    • Summary
    • Show Stats
    • Show Posts
      • Messages
      • Topics
      • Attachments
      • Thanked Posts
      • Posts Thanked By User
    • Show User Topics
      • User Created
      • User Participated In

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

  • Messages
  • Topics
  • Attachments
  • Thanked Posts
  • Posts Thanked By User

Topics - Yahya A.Sharif

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / How the atomic model works?
« on: 18/06/2022 17:04:26 »
How can Electrons in some physical phenomena return to a precise orbit around the nucleus " with a precise electron radius" after it loses its spinning position ? 

The phenomenon are:
Losing electrons during electrolysis.
Losing electron in electrostatics when for example rubbing silk with plastic.

The electron is a mass moves attracted by force if I am right the process must be like launching a rocket to put a satellite around the earth in a precise distance from earth's center. So how physically the electron is reinstalled in its orbit?

2
New Theories / The theory of everything
« on: 23/04/2022 22:37:41 »
The whole universe is energy. Rest mass is also energy can convert to energy, E=m0c². Rest mass exists in the universe  as energy.
The theory is every model in the universe is energy"or rest mass" at motion.There is not physics laws in a complete stationary universe
Rest mass and relativistic mass are "energy" "moves" and governed by Einstein theory of special relativity.
Light is photons "energy"  at "motion"
Electromagnetic waves are "energy" " vibrate and spread " Electromagnetic fields when hit an antenna converts its energy.
A lot of atomic phenomena is related to an electron" mass or energy"  "moving" from an orbit to another orbit emitting or absorbing" energy".
Magnetism is electrons" mass or energy "  " moves" in opposite directions
An atom is electrons" mass or energy " " moves" around a nucleus" mass or energy"
Electricity is  electrons" mass or energy"  "moves" through a wire " mass or energy".
A charge is an electron mass or "energy"
Electric field is force that causes "motion"
Magnetic force is a charge "moves" in a magnetic field.
Gravity is mass " energy" curves space-time. But space-time is only four dimensional  geometry.
A black hole is mass or energy.
The big bang is is the first exploded motion that occurred.
Life itself is motion. cells division , muscles movements, brain functioning, plants growing are motion if not there will not be life
The motion does not exceed the speed of light.

3
New Theories / Why self massage is not as effective as real massage?
« on: 16/04/2022 23:38:34 »
Self massage is not as effective as real massage. A person massaging his own body will  not reach high relaxation as real massage. The self massage pleasure a person receive is not as real massage. A person exerts effort in massaging himself instead of enjoying massage by another individual.

The current theory refers  to the difference between the self massage and real massage is not true. The theory says, while a person massaging his body the brain focus on the next move that will happen and you anticipate the feeling of relaxation  and you let go of the individual that is massaging you to do the work. This theory concept refer to a simple concept a wrong illogical  concept which is simply this because you are massaging yourself.

I can involve in all these situations if another individual is doing the work on my behalf. I can focus on the moves i can think of things and be busy in my mind while massaging I can even get relaxation while I am busy of dong something but I still receive better relaxation . If the person talks about what moves he is going to do in details I still get better relaxation.

Rubbing a part of body give the brain signals from the spot and signals return back to put my body in an relaxation state
My theory is the signals start from the spot of rubbing  and return back to the whole body but at the same time  some other signals are received by my  hands from the brain to make my hands  move as the rubbing and moving  hands are equivalent  that is to rub the spot I move my hands and to do a specif hands movement  I do another specific rubbing the signals from the spot and the equivalent movement of hands signal received from the brain are equivalent this develop a disorder in the signal system of my brain and body this disorder causes the person uncomfortable and anxious and do not reach the complete relaxation state .
However in real relaxation the signals are normal and perfect they start from the spot to the brain and return back to the body to make a complete relaxation.

The evidence is when I get real massage by an individual and at the same time I do self massage  If I focus on self massage I will still get the better relaxation.

4
New Theories / Photons do not exist
« on: 05/04/2022 20:21:46 »
Light occurs when electric current moves through a wire causing electrons to move from a higher position to its normal position in the atom emitting energy. So science believes this energy released is a photon but this not true an electron can not move at a sudden motion to give a quantum or photon this violates Einstein theory of relativity that nothing exceeds the speed of light " moving at a sudden is just an infinite speed". The electron moves from the higher position to its normal position at a fraction of the speed c making it impossible to emit a quantum.

5
New Theories / The theory of the human body special mass
« on: 22/03/2022 19:23:50 »
My new discovery will appear in public soon.

6
New Theories / The three types of infinite motion in the universe
« on: 07/03/2022 06:36:03 »
These are the three types of infinite motion in the universe of an object where this object travels infinite distance in infinite time.

1) An object moves in straight line this object will travel infinite distance in infinite time if we suppose that the object will not find some obstacle and the universe is infinite.

2) An object moves endlessly in a circle,  the object will travel infinite distance which is a portion of the circumference, if the object completed  two cycles the distance is the double the circumference.

3) An object starts from zero meters  and moves for instance toward 6  meters , if the deceleration increases infinitely opposing the object motion the distance traveled will increase without  bound but never reach the 6 meters distance.This idea is also represented in the special  theory of relatively in which a mass at motion increases in the speed but never reach the speed of light 3*10^8 m/s because the object's mass increases infinitely and the deceleration increases infinitely.

In all these cases the distance traveled for a mass  increases without bound and this what I mean by an infinite motion. The motion continuous non-stop
These are the only cases of a moving object that travels infinite distance and elapsing  infinite time non-stop

7
New Theories / The problem of free energy in the special theory of relativity
« on: 03/06/2021 16:32:25 »
Suppose I have a rest mass m0 of 10 kg, part of this mass 1 kg converts to energy, E=mc² , E=e joules.
In this  case I will have a new rest mass m0 which is 10-1 kg or 9 kg .

This system of rest mass 9 kg will move with speed v1 in which the relativistic mass for the system will be :
m=m0/√(1-v²/c²) or
m=9 / √(1-v1²/c²)       

Because no energy comes from out side, then m will  be 10 kg and this for speed v1 and rest mass 9 kg *
Now let's calculate the kinetic energy of the system :

The relativistic mass of the system is energy of the rest mass  or energy of m0"m0c²" plus energy due to motion:
K.E= m0c²/√(1-v1²/c²) + m0c²
K.E= 9c²/√(1-v1²/c²)+9c²

According to * and because m0=9 kg :
K.E= 10c²+9c² or          19c² joules :

However the whole energy of the system must be the converted mass energy 1 kg plus the remained rest mass 9 kg which is 10 kg or E=10c² joules but K.E is 19c² joules "which must be the whole energy of the moving system " the whole energy will only be 10c² joules and this means when a mass moves by its own energy its energy will increased without an external source.

8
New Theories / Accepting magic ? why not religion ?
« on: 29/11/2020 19:20:45 »
So , science is real we see phenomena and explain them well.
Magic is real , we see unbelievable actions done by magicians.
Magic is real , but it contradicts  science.

I see those people who fly , gathering many people from inside a small box, etc
Magic is not only about some magical performances that we don't know how they works , but also magical  actions that contracts science .An example of silence contradiction : How a volume of 10 men with specific density be placed inside a small box .Or how these men disappear if mass can't be destroyed.

It is not one thing we are waiting for some scientist to explain , it is a huge reality that contracts science.
We can not ignore scientists who accept religion and have arguments whose they believe are logical and we can not ignore those scientists who reject religion and question its validity . If so why not for religion , God created the universe in 6 days and the world came from a big bang.
An equivalent :
A)  A magician created a person from inside a box " religion " and
B) The person already exists " science".
If silence rejects A then it is against reality , if religion rejects B then it is a against the reality of the universe.

9
New Theories / Mass gravity vs mass inertia
« on: 18/11/2020 21:51:06 »
Here is my hypothesis :
Let's say:
f=ma , and F=GMm/r²
"The hypothesis is fundamental for Both these Newtonian equations and special relativity equations"
f in the first equation is the inertial force of object m and F in the second equation is the gravity force on m.
If m changes in its mass then both inertial force and force of gravity will change with the same rate.

There must be a relation between mass m being affected by gravity and mass m being affected by inertial force.

If mass is connected somehow to space-time and this connection enable mass to curve space-time this connection will also enable space-time to affect motion resulting in inertia .Space-time curvature makes mass to move with acceleration and space-time opposes mass motion with inertia acceleration.

Space-time straight geometry lines will resist motion of mass m with a force F=ma in a comparison of straight lines will be curved by a mass m.

If the mass is big both curvature and the effect on moving mass will be big if this effect is big then inertia will be big.

A mass at constant speed has no increment in its mass "special relativity "in this case there will not be my moving object effect, because my effect depends on mass"just like curvature depends on mass".

For some math the difference between my effect is highly large in numbers than curvature"gravity " force of inertia is higher than force of gravity both are for the same mass

10
New Theories / What is a photon ?
« on: 04/05/2020 18:41:02 »
What is a photon ?
A photon whether it is mass or energy  it shouldn’t move at c.

11
Just Chat! / Excuse me
« on: 11/03/2020 21:56:31 »
Excuse me I would like to publish my photo.

12
New Theories / The unique normal force on human body: a massive human can stand on weak toes
« on: 25/01/2020 15:55:02 »
The human massive body is able to stand on weak feet toes, also there will be slight pressure on soles  and toes  .
A person can lift himself with small force https://vixra.org/abs/2001.0310 he pushes the ground with this small force the ground will push him with the same small force , the two forces small force by pushing the ground and the small force ground exert upwards, will result in small pressure on feet and toes

Human body mass can be determined by comparing the body with another mass in scale" nothing new here ".The gravity of the human body is its mass times acceleration " nothing change here "
When a human body stands on a horizontal zero degree inclination surface. The gravity force of body on a surface is far greater than the normal force by the surface upwards . The  normal force of any object " but not a human  " is always equals to its weight " on a zero degree inclination surface.

The gravity force of body appears in a spring on scale by compressing it which shows body mass times acceleration" nothing new". But the force upwards appears on the phenomenon of massive human body standing on weak feet toes
 
The pressure on toes or soles is as a result of two  forces , one is the normal force of ground upwards and the other is force downwards  "weight " the normal force upwards  is always far less than weight so pressure on soles is very small.

The values : weight and normal force upwards related to each other mathematically .The massive the body is the force upwards "normal force " and the force downwards “ weight “ are big
The phenomenon  related only to gravity on a human body that is the toes won't bear for instance   "equivalent to human body "  80 kg mass  put on it it.That will press the toes extremely hard.

13
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Is it possible that human body has its own physical laws ?
« on: 13/01/2020 16:09:29 »
Does the human body have its own physics laws that governed by different laws and explains different phenomena of the body and  theses laws connected to each other in a way that the body has its own physics? The eye , nerves, the brain , cells, etc.


14
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Can a mass be lifted with force less than its weight ?
« on: 25/12/2019 15:16:58 »
A new scientific discovery
A mass can be lifted with force less than its weight
A human of 60 kg body can jump high but he will barely move a rock of 60 kg.
A human of 60 kg body can lift himself holding a bar many times but he will barely move the rock of 60 kg
A human of 60 kg can run fast with his massive body but he can barely move the rock of 60 kg.
Explanation
When a human uses his own body muscles to lift his own body mass he can do the moves with smaller force than lifting or moving any other object with the same mass, I can jump pushing my own body up high but I can't even move a rock of the same mass from the ground.

15
New Theories / Could mass reach the speed of light ?
« on: 12/12/2019 12:48:28 »
A mass at stationary relapse  distance equals zero , time is zero, time is frozen .According to special theory of relativity , as the mass gets faster the distance it travels decrease " A mass at stationary relapse  distance equals zero , time is zero, time is frozen .

According to special theory of relativity , as the mass gets faster the distance it travels decrease " length contraction" and time delays, if the object reach in its speed the speed of light it will in fact stops " the decrement in length will reach its minimum which is zero,  time stops, doesn't that means the mass at stationary is this case?What I mean is as the mass velocity increases its kinetic energy increase and at its smallest length contraction the length will equal zero.

L=L0√(1-v²/c²) by substituting v=c ,we could actually obtain a zero contracted length.The object in the number line moving from 2 to 3 will reach the 3 even if  it covers infinite fractions.What I A mass at stationary relapse  distance equals zero , time is zero, time is frozen .According to special theory of relativity , as the mass gets faster the distance it travels decrease " length contraction" and time delays, if the object reach in its speed the speed of light it will in fact stops " the descerment in length will reach its minimum which  is zero and time stops, doesn't that means the mass at stationary is this case?What I mean is as the mass velocity increase its kinetic energy increase and at its smallest length contraction the length will equal zero.L=L0√(1-v²/c²) by substituting v=c ,we could actually obtain a zero contracted length.The object in the number line moving from 2 to 3 will reach the 3 even if  it covers infinite fractions.What I propose here is the mass of an object "the frozen mass" will decrease as the kinetic energy increase , it will reach zero at a time " without energy conservative violation" at the time the mass reaches zero the kinetic energy will behave as a photon and  will move at the speed of light. The idea of zero mass is obvious when mass converts to energy " E=mcc²"However the idea of increment in mass is mysterious .The mass decreases and its contained energy is lost to be added to the total energy of the kinetic energy.Light is massless and travels at  the speed c if we substitute m=0 and v=c:

m=m0/√(1-v²/c²) , v=c , m=0,

0=0/0 the equation can't be applied to a photon , if the kinetic energy of a mass increases and the mass disappeared the equation also can't be applied to such case.It is for sure that if the above equation doesn't apply for a photon and doesn't apply to the cases I mentioned, then we can't be sure if the mass will move at the speed of light or not by using the equation .A photon is massless and moves at speed c, an object loses its mass when moving close to c, and its mass disappears becoming a photon when it moves at the speed of c.

My equation for the decrements in mass is :

m=m0 * √(1-v²/c²)

At the time v=0 " stationary "  m= m0 , the mass doesn't decrease .
At the time v=c ,then m=0  the mass vanish into energy and the whole energy " energy due to motion and energy of the rest mass " will move at the speed of light c.

The equation doesn't affect the general relativity kinetic energy equation:

K.E=m0c²/√(1-v²/c²) +mc², It could be :E0/√(1-v²/c²) +E0 , E0 is the energy of the rest mass which doesn't change even if the mass decrease" m0 will convert to E0"

16
New Theories / A perpetual motion machine
« on: 07/12/2019 22:14:14 »
What happens to the output distance of gear box of large ratio "  1: 10000" low torque "  if the input" large torque " started with an infinitely small distance ?


17
New Theories / Finite extending gravity range explained
« on: 26/10/2019 13:11:49 »
It is not possible for an object in  motion to pass numbers and reach infinity  but in the following case  An object at motion can be considered  to be passing  infinite  numbers 4 , 4.1 , 4.11 ,  4.111 , infinity ,  5  limit  , an object moving from 1 to 2 distance passes fraction of infinite numbers reaches infinity  which is represented  by 2

In the case of infinite numbers from 1 to 2
1) Limit of x as x approaching 2 is 2
In the case of infinite numbers from let's say 5 Newton   to 0 zero  Newton
2) Limit of y as y approaching 0  is 0

The contradiction   is gravity being infinite is that number 2 equation should have value of infinity , but logically gravity decrease and it is limit is 0
The conclusion of all the above is gravity in fact reaches zero in points in space-time while space-time is infinite , it means gravity is not infinity.

accelerated values of gravity distance could be a case of infinite numbers  from 1 to 2 passed by an object this object is  in fact reaches 2 and passes infinite numbers.
 
My hypothesis gravity is limited to a range extending at the speed of c  that is numbers in this  range in fact has limit beyond this limit gravity equals zero , I can choose gravity to decrease infinity  in an accelerated way to reach zero at the edge .

Newton gravity equation is valid, gravity in case it is limited , has limited range extend with the speed of light from a number and ends zero at the edge It has nothing to do with the infinite distance of space time  ,  The fact is we have infinite distance related to infinite space-time and  we have another distance related  to the range ends in zero . .

18
That CAN'T be true! / My new theory has been recognized by Google
« on: 24/09/2019 18:39:43 »
Search key words:
Is gravity range limited ?

19
Technology / Will this rotating chair be useful?
« on: 22/09/2019 09:09:24 »
I don't need to present a sketch , the idea is simple:
A chair which rotates slowly enough to pleasure people who are sitting to drink coffee , eating breakfast , or chatting
The purpose of this slow rotation is to get pleasure of changing the direction  of sight in open places , also to reduce boredom of sitting in one position.
I think the idea is great.
What do you think as you  who might use it ?

20
New Theories / Finite space
« on: 11/09/2019 18:27:30 »
Space is finite.
If space is infinite ; mass will cause space-time to move to all directions"space-time won't be curved" and this displacement of space will spread at the speed of light, and there won't be any gravity.

If space is finite, there should be a point where it is fixed to " means this point won't  be curved or  displaced  even if mass exists there " so that mass can curve space-time instead of moving it to all directions , this point which space is fixed to is the end of space.

Gravity speed is the  speed of light, that indicates that space can't be curved if space is infinite, since the curvature idea in fact is not some mass curve  space anywhere including infinity ,  and that because space-time curvature has a finite speed, at this case while gravity approaches 0 and never reach it , then there won't be a fixed point at which space ends,  if so and space is infinite , space will move to all directions"no gravity ", so space is finite

Pages: [1] 2 3
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.091 seconds with 65 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.