The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. General Science
  4. Do you agree that one should agree with the modern professional scientific intel
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Do you agree that one should agree with the modern professional scientific intel

  • 1 Replies
  • 4513 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline maryakkutty (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 1
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Do you agree that one should agree with the modern professional scientific intel
« on: 22/10/2010 07:34:39 »
Do you agree that one should agree with the modern professional scientific intellects even if it is a lie?
According to modern Professional Scientific Intellects:
1. Science never searches for divisibility.
2. Science never searches for comparability.
3. Science never searches for connectivity.
4. Science never searches for sensitivity.
5. Science never searches for transformability.
6. Science never searches for substitutability.
7. Science never searches for satisfiability.
One should agree with these statements. Else, you would be branded as maniac! Am I right?
Doesn't science search, find and teach you about divisibility of atoms, molecules, ions, numbers, equations, words, cells, tissues, organs, and other entities? Doesn?t mathematics teach you that everything is perfectly divisible by unity?

Doesn't science search, find and teach you about comparability of atoms, molecules, ions,  numbers, equations, words, cells, tissues, organs, and other entities? Doesn?t science teach   you the methods of comparing and contrasting things?

Doesn't science search, find and teach you about connectivity of atoms, molecules, ions,  numbers, equations, words, cells, tissues, organs, and other entities? Anything which cannot be connected to your mind cannot be thought.

Doesn't science search, find and teach you about sensitivity of atoms, molecules, ions, numbers, equations, words, cells, tissues, organs, and other entities? How can one assay the cause-effect if no thing has sensitivity?
 
Doesn't science search, find and teach you about transformability of atoms, molecules, ions,numbers, equations, words, cells, tissues, organs, and other entities? Hasn?t science taught transformations of energy, matter, equations, sentences?

Doesn't science search, find and teach you about substitutability of atoms, molecules, ions, numbers, equations, words, cells, tissues, organs, and other entities? No computer can be at work if does not have searched for substitutability. What is going to be in the place of what is present now? What is evolution?

Doesn't science search, find and teach you about the conditions which could be satisfied  (satisfiability) by atoms, molecules, ions, numbers, equations, words, cells, tissues, organs,  and other entities?

What would your knowledge be if no thing has divisibility, comparability, connectivity, sensitivity, transformability, substitutability and satisfiability?


Logged
 



Offline JimBob

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6543
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • Moderator
    • View Profile
Do you agree that one should agree with the modern professional scientific intel
« Reply #1 on: 23/10/2010 04:24:51 »
Quote from: maryakkutty on 22/10/2010 07:34:39


1.)  .... even if it is a lie?
(snip)

2.)  One should agree with these statements. Else, you would be branded as maniac! Am I right?


1.) Where are you getting your information? These 7 statements have nothing to do with science as I know it OR with any of the training I received in science.

2.) One should never agree with established science. One should investigate and attempt to find new ideas on DATA that is at hand and obtained. It is only inquiring minds that advance our scientific thought.

Only if there is no supporting data to back one up, or if the data is misused, is one considered a maniac or a loony. And one needs to know what the data means before interpretations are made.

I am also moving this to a more suitable forum - "General Science."
Logged
The mind is like a parachute. It works best when open.  -- A. Einstein
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Are you aware that a scientific fact can decay? (Fact Decay?)

Started by Alan McDougallBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 2
Views: 3286
Last post 10/06/2016 11:41:24
by evan_au
Is there a scientific definition of "wet"?

Started by DoctorBeaverBoard General Science

Replies: 11
Views: 24006
Last post 14/01/2018 21:06:57
by Bored chemist
Is there - grrrrr - any scientific justification for - GRRRRR - burning stubble?

Started by GeezerBoard Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution

Replies: 6
Views: 8342
Last post 22/02/2011 22:47:30
by ronro
What is the latest "Scientific" thinking about Global Warming ?

Started by Joe L. OganBoard General Science

Replies: 6
Views: 5965
Last post 09/11/2009 02:32:00
by Joe L. Ogan
There is a forum at "thunderbolt.info" which explores many scientific concepts

Started by Joe L. OganBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 15
Views: 10071
Last post 08/02/2010 23:43:25
by Soul Surfer
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.075 seconds with 33 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.