[acsinuk (OP)]

STEVENS DEEP SPACE DARK FORCES HYPOTHESIS 
No dark matter or dark energy has been found in space to balance the WMAP dark forces,but could they be
1] The dark force of mass attraction G is the weakest of the dark forces in distant space.
2 The electromagnetic dark matter spin force of about 5G rotates galactic stars around a magnetic black hole hub
3. Repulsion by a near 25G dark energy force is responsible for expanding the universe as stars are assumed to have positively charged surfaces and thus repel each other electrostatically'

[Bored chemist]

Word salad- with pictures!

[Kryptid]

Electrostatic repulsion cannot push things faster than light, so this doesn't work.

[acsinuk (OP)]

Inside the universe is magnetised and outside is not and is empty non existent and cannot transit light. I wrote this blog  para  in 2006
" The restriction on AC plasma energy to move only within the electromagnetic magnoflux fabric of space, was necessary at Gods creation to confine the Almighty plasma flash of AC light energy and stop it moving away at the speed of light which would have lead to an infinite dispersion. This restriction still applies today, for if 99.99% of the stars/Sun energy is just blasted off into space which is 99.99% empty, then 99.99% of the energy will arrive at the edge of the universe with nowhere to go except outwards leading to a catastrophic dilution. As the edge of the universe is defined by a known amount of red-shift and the edge is not shining brilliantly, we can deduce that the random T^4 energy law only applies to a tiny number of Wolf Rayet type stars. Stars in the main sequence are not emitted in all directions, as believed by Stefan but only through the magnetic-flux tunnels in space. Thus the Sun beams most of its output directly to the planets and the intervening space is mostly dark. Stars appear as lighthouses, beaming light directly to all the planets but mostly their own planets, moons, comets & asteroids.
There has to be a boundary in space [heliopause] between the stars, where the incoming energy exactly balances the outgoing energy. See soft balloon diagram below. Each star system is self contained with a star at the centre of its volume. According to the latest Lambda-CDM model 70% of the universe is missing, but agrees that quote ?it says nothing about the fundamental physical origin of dark matter or dark energy? so is unable to explain the universe correctly. The electro static repulsion has been ignored in the classical model; so it won?t balance.



.

[Bored chemist]

I wrote this blog  para  in 2006

It was wrong then; it's still wrong now.

[Kryptid]

How does your model deal with this problem?

Electrostatic repulsion cannot push things faster than light, so this doesn't work.

[paul cotter]

Dark forces in deep space?  Maybe the op is thinking of  "Satan", "Lucifer", Old Nick", "Prince of darkness",  "father of lies" or other synonym?

[Bored chemist]

How does your model deal with this problem?

Electrostatic repulsion cannot push things faster than light, so this doesn't work.

By putting his fingers in his ears and saying "La La La I'm not listening!"

[acsinuk (OP)]

The problem is that dark electromagnetic forces occupy a volume x,y,z but are massless and therefore cannot we measured physically as material change but only in hindsight as an effect.  So have revised the hypothesis as follows
No dark matter or dark energy has been found in space because dark massless forces are needed to balance the WMAP results which I hypothesise as
1 The dark force of mass attraction G is the weakest in distant space volume x,y,z.
2 Electromagnetic dark matter magnoflux spin x,y inertia force of about 5G rotates galactic stars around a magnetic black hole hub
3. Electro-static repulsion of a near 25G dark energy force in z direction is responsible for expanding the universe as stars are assumed as having huge surface plus charges.

[Bored chemist]

The problem is that dark electromagnetic forces occupy a volume x,y,z but are massless and therefore cannot we measured physically as material change

All forces are massless, but they can still be measured.
Why do you post stuff that makes no sense?

[Kryptid]

The problem is that dark electromagnetic forces occupy a volume x,y,z but are massless and therefore cannot we measured physically as material change but only in hindsight as an effect.  So have revised the hypothesis as follows
No dark matter or dark energy has been found in space because dark massless forces are needed to balance the WMAP results which I hypothesise as
1 The dark force of mass attraction G is the weakest in distant space volume x,y,z.
2 Electromagnetic dark matter magnoflux spin x,y inertia force of about 5G rotates galactic stars around a magnetic black hole hub
3. Electro-static repulsion of a near 25G dark energy force in z direction is responsible for expanding the universe as stars are assumed as having huge surface plus charges.

That still doesn't address the apparent superluminal motion of distant galaxies.