0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: psikeyhackr on 20/05/2009 00:23:49How can you build scaled models demonstrating the physics if you don't have the distribution of mass data on the subject?Yes that would be impossible to determine, and there are no resources that you can draw on.
How can you build scaled models demonstrating the physics if you don't have the distribution of mass data on the subject?
building gets hit by enormous aircraft full of flammable fuel, there is a huge fire started and then after an hour or so, the building fell down.
I note your excessive use of capital letters, and the fact that you still haven't got any relevant data; another hotel caught fire you say, that wasn't hit by an aircraft with 10,000 gallons of fuel, and didn't burn down? What does that prove?I also note you seem to be surprised that fuel which has a equivalent energy of 450 tonnes of TNT could take down a structure like the world trade centre.
What's the point; you've made your mind up and USED UPPERCASE TO DO IT. Clearly if you've used upper case, then your point must be true.
Yes, I agree with you that it's only physics if you're using uppercase. That's how all modern physics is done, and it's not a sign of possible mental instability at all.
Well, you know what they say; conspiracy theories can be fun.
So, tell us again how you not bothering to model any of the correct stress or mass distribution in a 'test' proves that a building that fell down, couldn't have fallen down?
European science is the only science obviously.
Quote from: psikeyhackr on 23/08/2009 21:56:50European science is the only science obviously.Spread the news in your country!
We don't have to worry that much about plains in our skyscraper here on the European mainland, seeing as we don't p*ss off other nations around the globe as much as you do.