0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
When I posed the questions I certainly didn't expect an answer. What you have described has nothing at all to do with what I am attempting so is irrelevant. I didn't understand most of it as it made no sense anyway.
Quote from: jeffreyH on 19/01/2016 18:27:33When I posed the questions I certainly didn't expect an answer. What you have described has nothing at all to do with what I am attempting so is irrelevant. I didn't understand most of it as it made no sense anyway.Not sure if this relevant to you Jeff, but when I read your question my first though was a bow and arrow.
Quote from: Thebox on 19/01/2016 19:34:19Quote from: jeffreyH on 19/01/2016 18:27:33When I posed the questions I certainly didn't expect an answer. What you have described has nothing at all to do with what I am attempting so is irrelevant. I didn't understand most of it as it made no sense anyway.Not sure if this relevant to you Jeff, but when I read your question my first though was a bow and arrow.If you were to fire one arrow directly upwards and another at an angle then you would start to see the issues. If you are using exactly the same force to launch all arrows then you can propel an arrow the furthest distance by launching it at a 45 degree angle with respect to the ground. If you consider how fast and therefore how much energy an arrow would need to be able to sustain an orbit or escape the earth altogether then you can reach some interesting conclusions.
Quote from: jeffreyH on 19/01/2016 19:49:44Quote from: Thebox on 19/01/2016 19:34:19Quote from: jeffreyH on 19/01/2016 18:27:33When I posed the questions I certainly didn't expect an answer. What you have described has nothing at all to do with what I am attempting so is irrelevant. I didn't understand most of it as it made no sense anyway.Not sure if this relevant to you Jeff, but when I read your question my first though was a bow and arrow.If you were to fire one arrow directly upwards and another at an angle then you would start to see the issues. If you are using exactly the same force to launch all arrows then you can propel an arrow the furthest distance by launching it at a 45 degree angle with respect to the ground. If you consider how fast and therefore how much energy an arrow would need to be able to sustain an orbit or escape the earth altogether then you can reach some interesting conclusions.A bit like the Cannon ball idea and escape velocity. I should hope the one at 45 degrees would travel further, the arrow fired vertically up will eventually slow , then turn, then travel back down vertically , excluding weather and air of course.added - i drew it for you Jeff , It may help you [ Invalid Attachment ] I added atmosphere to it [ Invalid Attachment ]
Thebox's diagrams are suitable for the purpose and I will come back to them. For now what is needed is a linearly independent solution to the equation Ax = 0 for the energy space. That is that the only solution is the trivial solution where all scalars are zero. Once we have a span and basis for the set of vectors then maybe something interesting will reveal itself.However there has been no definition yet of the format of the space equations.
Jef this just came to me while I was sleeping, don't ask. 0+0=00=xare you working on something like this?https://www.sciencenews.org/article/quantum-histories-get-all-tangled
The velocity components increase and decrease. Gravity stratifies matter like any other centrifuge.