The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution
  4. How do Darwinian and Lamarckian theories of evolution differ?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

How do Darwinian and Lamarckian theories of evolution differ?

  • 1 Replies
  • 2299 Views
  • 4 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Stevie Bain (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 26
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
How do Darwinian and Lamarckian theories of evolution differ?
« on: 30/08/2017 10:10:52 »
Stefan would like to know:

What is the difference between Darwin's theory of evolution and Lamarck's theory of evolution? Can both be correct and occur simultaneously?

Can you help answer this question?
« Last Edit: 30/08/2017 22:54:04 by chris »
Logged
 



Marked as best answer by chris on 02/09/2017 10:19:47

Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 10245
  • Activity:
    32%
  • Thanked: 1229 times
    • View Profile
Re: How do Darwinian and Lamarckian theories of evolution differ?
« Reply #1 on: 01/09/2017 19:40:54 »
Lamarck believed that if a creature exercised a certain trait in its lifetime, that trait would be inherited more strongly by its offspring.

Darwin continued to believe this, but disagreed with some other aspects of Lamarck's theory. Darwin added natural selection (and sexual selection) as the source of emphasis of a trait in a population.

Until perhaps 50 years ago, Darwin's followers absorbed the genetics discovered by Gregor Mendel, and criticised Lamarck (forgetting that Darwin also followed Lamarck).

The discovery of epigenetics showed that exposure to stimuli during your lifetime could affect your children and grandchildren. So, in a sense, Lamarck had the last laugh.

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamarckism
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: darwin  / lamarck  / evolution  / theory of evolution 
 

Similar topics (5)

Just read "Evolution Through the Looking Glass", I do not agree...

Started by MangalmurtiBoard Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution

Replies: 5
Views: 5699
Last post 03/10/2018 20:03:37
by Bored chemist
When does evolution turn "choice" into speciation

Started by nismo1Board Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution

Replies: 3
Views: 4355
Last post 29/09/2011 15:07:26
by nismo1
The evolution of man "Homo Sapiens" 200 thousand years into the future

Started by Alan McDougallBoard Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution

Replies: 6
Views: 17638
Last post 18/11/2008 18:57:49
by Alan McDougall
What is a "neutron bomb", and how does it differ from an "atom bomb"?

Started by georgeBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 13
Views: 22541
Last post 05/02/2007 18:45:36
by Batroost
How do liquid fuelled rockets and solid liquid fuelled rockets differ?

Started by Naufal the B. S.Board Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 12
Views: 11337
Last post 02/08/2009 16:42:28
by Bored chemist
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.072 seconds with 33 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.