The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Discussion & Feedback
  3. Just Chat!
  4. Has society become too materialistic and risk averse to advance?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Has society become too materialistic and risk averse to advance?

  • 1 Replies
  • 91 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline CmdrShep2154 (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 13
  • Activity:
    0.5%
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • View Profile
Has society become too materialistic and risk averse to advance?
« on: 13/05/2022 03:58:11 »
It seemed like from the 2000s-early 2010s there was an great increase of risk aversion.

https://practicalfreespirit.com/2011/09/06/to-infinity-and-beyond/ [nofollow]

"Sometime in the last few months, I read someone’s Tweet about space travel. I don’t remember who it was, but they said something to the effect of how science fiction set in space felt irrelevant or dated to them. Like it was nostalgia and nothing more."

Human spaceflight and space themed sci fi, a anachronism? What a sad mindset!

The events of the 2000s has given society the right to be risk averse and more cynical for the future but is this risk aversion holding humanity back?

There also seemed to be an increase of materialism as evidenced by the reality show craze of the late 2000s/early 2010s. Interesting it happened during the financial crisis.

Large portions of society still struggle after the 2008 crash but it seems like there is a portion of society that is well off and doesn't seem to care.

Nice house in a safe suburban neighborhood, German made car, cushy office job, nice vacations each year, etc.

Life is good enough already, so why dream of a "Star Trek" like future?

That is the reality show demographic.
Logged
 



Offline Eternal Student

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 921
  • Activity:
    41%
  • Thanked: 177 times
    • View Profile
Re: Has society become too materialistic and risk averse to advance?
« Reply #1 on: 13/05/2022 18:16:03 »
Hi.

   Not sure I've spoken to you before.   I'm also not at all sure what sort of response you wanted.

   I don't think the average man or woman in "society" has a lot to do with developing spaceflight and a star trek style future.   I've always assumed the governments have much more control and influence over that.    When there is a drive, such as in the "space race" between  let's say 1955 - 1969,  amazing things happen and amazingly quickly.
    As such, I'm not sure that development will be significantly influenced by how materialistic or risk-averse I am or you are.

Best Wishes.
   

Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.084 seconds with 37 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.