0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Spring Theory on 09/07/2022 14:22:22Quote from: Bored chemist on 09/07/2022 13:33:09Quote from: Spring Theory on 09/07/2022 13:26:40Incorrect. Never been tested. Positrons find an electron too quickly.You are right; your statement there is incorrect.It has been tested.The positrons in accelerators are stable.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Electron%E2%80%93Positron_ColliderWere you not aware of what is probably one of the best known bits of scientific kit in the world?Pretty useless comment, but I will attempt to penetrate the steel trap...Show me a similar test like the Kamiokande experiment.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton_decayNo.That's not the way it works.You are the one making the extraordinary claim.Responsibility to show that your idea is right falls to you.Show us your extraordinary evidence.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 09/07/2022 13:33:09Quote from: Spring Theory on 09/07/2022 13:26:40Incorrect. Never been tested. Positrons find an electron too quickly.You are right; your statement there is incorrect.It has been tested.The positrons in accelerators are stable.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Electron%E2%80%93Positron_ColliderWere you not aware of what is probably one of the best known bits of scientific kit in the world?Pretty useless comment, but I will attempt to penetrate the steel trap...Show me a similar test like the Kamiokande experiment.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton_decay
Quote from: Spring Theory on 09/07/2022 13:26:40Incorrect. Never been tested. Positrons find an electron too quickly.You are right; your statement there is incorrect.It has been tested.The positrons in accelerators are stable.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Electron%E2%80%93Positron_ColliderWere you not aware of what is probably one of the best known bits of scientific kit in the world?
Incorrect. Never been tested. Positrons find an electron too quickly.
I'm only here to make extraordinary prediction
Quote from: Spring Theory on 20/04/2023 20:35:57I'm only here to make extraordinary predictionAnyone can make up nonsense.You don't even seem to realise that you are useless.
The rotor never reaches synchronous speed. The difference is called the slip. When used as a motor the rotor speed will be less than synchronous, when used as a generator the rotor speed will be greater synchronous. The degree of slip depends on the load and of course the design of the motor. A full rigorous analysis of the squirrel cage motor is quite complex.
There is nothing missing from Maxwell's equations, they do exactly what's written on the tin, no more, no less.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 26/06/2022 10:46:15Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 02/07/2016 13:47:55Some of electrolytic solutions that will be used are NaCl, H2SO4, HCl, CuSO4, FeCl3.\What happened when you used them?My previous experiment didn't produce conclusive result yet. I'll try again if I can find a way to improve the experimental setup and increase the signal over noise ratio.
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 02/07/2016 13:47:55Some of electrolytic solutions that will be used are NaCl, H2SO4, HCl, CuSO4, FeCl3.\What happened when you used them?
Some of electrolytic solutions that will be used are NaCl, H2SO4, HCl, CuSO4, FeCl3.
Hamdani, I posted in haste without reducing to basic units and I was in error. But dimensional analysis is a separate discipline to Maxwell's equations, so what if mass turns up in the analysis? As I said, more than once, Maxwell's equations do what they do, they don't tell me the lottery numbers to pick or any other matters outside their scope. I don't understand your obsession with Maxwell, all our equations have limited but valuable applications.
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 26/06/2022 13:38:25Quote from: Bored chemist on 26/06/2022 10:46:15Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 02/07/2016 13:47:55Some of electrolytic solutions that will be used are NaCl, H2SO4, HCl, CuSO4, FeCl3.\What happened when you used them?My previous experiment didn't produce conclusive result yet. I'll try again if I can find a way to improve the experimental setup and increase the signal over noise ratio. Any news?
My analogy between rotor rotational inertia of an induction motor and a capacitor connected to output of secondary coil in a transformer shows the similarity between them. By simply increasing rotor rotational inertia, we can increase effective capacitance. It can be done in several ways, such as adding plastic or ceramic plate to the rotor shaft, or reconfigure mass distribution of the rotor to be further away from rotational axis.
The diagram below shows an analogy between an induction motor and a transformer with capacitive load on secondary coil. To simplify, resistive loads are made negligible.
There's mechanical-electrical analogy for RLC circuit. Some of us are unaware that there are two types of analogies, which may create confusion.In the case of rotating equipment like generator and motor, the mass should be replaced by rotational inertia.