The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Profile of Petrochemicals
  3. Show Posts
  4. Thanked Posts
  • Profile Info
    • Summary
    • Show Stats
    • Show Posts
      • Messages
      • Topics
      • Attachments
      • Thanked Posts
      • Posts Thanked By User
    • Show User Topics
      • User Created
      • User Participated In

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

  • Messages
  • Topics
  • Attachments
  • Thanked Posts
  • Posts Thanked By User

Messages - Petrochemicals

Pages: [1] 2
1
Just Chat! / Re: Top ten medical breakthroughs the past four decades?
« on: 08/04/2021 01:19:36 »
4 decades? That would mean 1980.  I think you are showing your age.
The following users thanked this post: Bored chemist

2
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: What causes nuclear power plant meltdowns?
« on: 03/04/2021 22:30:19 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 03/04/2021 11:11:54
Fukushima was correctly designed to withstand the "100 year" tsunami but not the 1000 year beast that killed it.
With pumps situated on the floor. D'oh.
The following users thanked this post: Zer0

3
Physiology & Medicine / Re: Is it desirable for Mankind to be smaller in stature?
« on: 27/03/2021 00:59:44 »
Quote from: evan_au on 26/03/2021 07:55:24
Reputable information from that authority on alien intelligence (the MIB franchise) suggests that it is possible to hide a tiny alien inside a robot dog... (IIRC)

* Tiny_Alien_MIB.png (249.2 kB . 589x320 - viewed 301 times)
Nope I believe he was a tall sanguine man


If the brain stayed the same size but the body shrank Mankind would be phenomenally clever.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain-to-body_mass_ratio

Bigger people need bigger brains to keep parity, but also require more food and bodies seem to be subject to greater strain. Given that Mankind is in its evolutionary position because of the brain but is also in reaching in size due to the brain, we seem to be going down an evolutionary defeating path.
The following users thanked this post: charles1948

4
Physiology & Medicine / Re: Could human beings hibernate?
« on: 09/03/2021 22:53:02 »
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 05/03/2021 11:00:41
Quote from: axscientist on 26/01/2021 01:39:01
Technically, we can. Bears and even some primates are able to hibernate, which means us humans are also able to do so.
Technically bears do not hibernate, the go into something called a torpor. I am unsure of the primates. Hibernation has the body temperature drop to ambient to the point that some animals drop just below 0c body temperature, the head being just above. The metabolic rate almost ceases unlike in bears.

https://sciencesimplyexplained.com/do-bears-hibernate-in-winter/
I have just remembered humans who cease to breath and circulate blood often are capable of being revived if they have been at very low temperatures even if it is a matter of hours without breath, so in a way hiberhation is possible in humans. I am not sure of the medical processes of decomposition or damage, really you need a medical person for that, but cold seems to stop this. I believe it requires a quick chill though.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300957214005243
The following users thanked this post: Zer0

5
Physiology & Medicine / Re: Could human beings hibernate?
« on: 05/03/2021 11:00:41 »
Quote from: axscientist on 26/01/2021 01:39:01
Technically, we can. Bears and even some primates are able to hibernate, which means us humans are also able to do so.
Technically bears do not hibernate, the go into something called a torpor. I am unsure of the primates. Hibernation has the body temperature drop to ambient to the point that some animals drop just below 0c body temperature, the head being just above. The metabolic rate almost ceases unlike in bears.

https://sciencesimplyexplained.com/do-bears-hibernate-in-winter/
The following users thanked this post: Zer0

6
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Space hotel to open in 2027: your thoughts?
« on: 04/03/2021 23:03:49 »
From the picture it looks like a rotating arrangement. So no fun with weightlessness then. I would rather go to the moon
The following users thanked this post: bearnard1212

7
Just Chat! / Re: I think I know why many don't accept global warming
« on: 24/02/2021 20:56:11 »
Quote from: charles1948 on 22/02/2021 00:53:48
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 19/02/2021 19:54:10
Does everyone not accept climate warming, the argument seems to be the cause.

Everyone accepts that the Earth's climate naturally changes over time. That's why the Earth has been through a succession of Ice Ages, and warm Interglacial periods, for the past 3,000,000 years.  And much further back than that. Heck, 700,000,000 years ago, the entire planet was supposedly frozen all over as Snowball Earth. And in the later Carboniferous Period, the planet was a giant hothouse, with huge ferns and 18" dragonflies swarming all over.

All that is part of the natural order of things. 

I think what gets people's goat is this: the modern suggestion, pushed in our faces remorselessly by the media, that whenever the climate changes nowadays, even a bit:

IT'S ALL OUR FAULT!

This suggestion is so ludicrous that can you wonder why people don't accept it. And suspect some conspiratorial motive behind it.








Don't forget this is pushed into the face of the proletariat by idealistic monied people's with no real proof of the cause and lots of the "why don't you buy bamboo clothes and drive electric cars?".

The following users thanked this post: charles1948

8
Just Chat! / Re: Member type
« on: 21/02/2021 22:59:39 »
So Chris is very lazy.
The following users thanked this post: Zer0

9
Just Chat! / Re: Why should I be bothered with lockdown?
« on: 21/02/2021 22:52:42 »
Quote from: charles1948 on 21/02/2021 22:31:53
I think that we shouldn't have done any "lockdowns".  We should've just let the virus run its course.

We'll have to do that in the end.  All this flim-flammery of lockdowns is just a futile attempt to stave off the inevitable.

We can't beat the virus. It's too microscopic  Face-masks won't block it.. It will get everywhere. And infect everyone.

It's just Nature's way. 
The vulnerable could have shielded without the general population, their experience would have at worst been exactly the same, but probably lots better than the one that they and everyone  else have experienced. Anybody anybody over 55 or who needed to  protect themselves could have been put on a pension.

Face masks clearly do not work.

https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=80639.0
The following users thanked this post: charles1948

10
New Theories / Re: Is Bilĺ Gates the problem more then the solution?
« on: 02/02/2021 01:30:55 »
Are not all these vaccines" not for profit" ?
The following users thanked this post: Zer0

11
Physiology & Medicine / Re: Could electrical interference disrupt your body without making contact?
« on: 30/01/2021 09:42:36 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 29/01/2021 14:40:47
Quote from: charles1948 on 29/01/2021 00:46:05
And these ovens, as you know, can cook meat.  And as our brains are, essentially, made of meat, they can be cooked by the microwaves.
Time was that you were told not to put your head in the gas oven. Nothing has changed.
That was with town gas, these days you don't need to put your head in the oven with natural gas, just wait for the explosion.

There is a serious risk for people with pacemakers from areas that have heavily saturated magnetism.

https://www.heart.org/en/health-topics/arrhythmia/prevention--treatment-of-arrhythmia/devices-that-may-interfere-with-icds-and-pacemakers
The following users thanked this post: charles1948

12
COVID-19 / Re: Would an extended dosage interval work for the Oxford vaccine?
« on: 13/01/2021 00:41:03 »
I think the single astra zenica is similar the published 2 dose efficacy of 70%. Probably one of the reasons the government opted for one dose.
The following users thanked this post: JohnH

13
Physiology & Medicine / Re: Is there any way of localising the source of substance P?
« on: 13/11/2020 21:34:16 »
As a Pain suffer with no medical background, I have often thought of pain being a nerve that slowly becomes less noticeable. Catastrophic sciatica a year ago lingered horrifically for 6 weeks, moving position on the nerve. Affected me mentally, really ground me down with such sharp severe pain so repeatedly over such a long period. I think that the pain died away but the problem did not, I feel a re-emergence from time to time as though the nerve is coming back to life. This cannot be true, my nerves in my leg still work, but something is different about the area where the pain originated, somehow less responsive and sensitive.

 Complete utter guess but substance p may be a long term cell response to pain signals, in reality there is no point to pain as long as the ceature stops injuring or neglecting itself, this includes bad posture, diet etc. Long term pain with no reason just reduces said creature to incapability and limits its survivability.
The following users thanked this post: drmahavir@gmail.com

14
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: What falls faster: heavy or light objects?
« on: 09/10/2020 22:11:34 »
Galileo was wrong and the aristotlewas correct, his balls did hit the floor at different times,it's just not really percept able.

What falls faster a neutron star or the comet that killed the dinosaurs?
The following users thanked this post: evan_au

15
Technology / Re: Altering orbits using earth's magnetic field or generated fields from earth?
« on: 27/05/2020 22:35:24 »
I assume the energy you are hoping to create is due to your movement through the field ? This is a law of physics that escapes me at the minute but it had something to do with an airplane oving through the earths magnetic field and how much charge it would create its also constrained by energy conservation, basically you have to put energy in to the movement to get the electrical energy out.
Quote from: Colin2B on 27/05/2020 07:10:12
Quote from: Edwina Lee on 27/05/2020 02:18:52
Is it possible to use the earth's magnetic field to move around in space, or even take off from earth?
The earth’s magnetic field is very weak compared to the force required to move a spaceship. It can move a magnetised needle on a low friction support, but anything heavier like a bar magnet on a desk doesn’t move. Also even a weak bar magnet will easily overpower the earth’s field and influence a compass needle
As we get further from earth the earth’s magnetic field gets weaker, but a magnet will still be able to align along the field see
Notice how the magnet is stronger than the earth’s magnetic field.
How about the radiation fields ?
The following users thanked this post: Edwina Lee

16
Radio Show & Podcast Feedback / How much does it cost to go to the moon ?
« on: 08/05/2020 01:40:54 »
As in title.
The following users thanked this post: Zer0

17
Just Chat! / Re: why would a scientist accept the bible
« on: 17/04/2020 15:18:17 »
 

I answered this thread honestly, I think you should honestly edit the title to some thing like, "why does duffy antagonise for god"
The following users thanked this post: duffyd

18
Just Chat! / Re: why would a scientist accept the bible
« on: 17/04/2020 02:25:25 »
Quote from: duffyd on 17/04/2020 01:23:24
While they obssess over Christians, they pretend we are all perverts, evil, two-faced beasts. They know that millions, the vast majority of Christians are lovely, good, decent, honest people and the fact that they never mention that proves they must strain to argue their side.
Christ laid it all out on the pages of the N.T. Didn't pull punches. Didn't try to sweet talk HIS opponents. He told them what HE thought with candid authority. They murmured and plotted. They ganged up on HIM secretly using every devilish manipulation to have their will done. I wish I had been there. I would loved to have seen it unfold. Each part coming to pass in brief snippets of time, I'd be observing it all go down, just as we read in the N.T. The smell of the Passover meals cooking, the swirling aroma in the air, the sounds of children in the background, the enormous stones they carved to form the buildings, the clothing ancient women wore, their gnarled teeth, the swords the men carried. What is really weird is that it really did take place. It happened. Long, long time ago. Just as they said.
So
 
The following users thanked this post: duffyd

19
Just Chat! / Re: why would a scientist accept the bible
« on: 06/04/2020 00:51:25 »
From a humanitarian point, are you ok Duffy, should we contact the relevant authorities ? I mean your answering yourself.
Quote from: duffyd on 05/04/2020 23:24:05
Quote from: duffyd on 05/04/2020 01:28:05
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 04/04/2020 20:59:42
Dear god is this still going ?

People ressurected by jesus - 0
Years of living in plague filled misery since jesus 1600
Separation of religion from law 400 years ago
People saved from malaria by jesus 0
People saved by science from malaria over 1 billion
Dont marry your sister !
1. 0 resurrected by jesus
Can you support that with credible evidence? Thanks

No.
I know no one resurrected by christ, no one i know has heard of this. Its never made the news. Promises promises and no honouring of them. I cannot prove somethingincorrect that refuses to exist.
The following users thanked this post: duffyd

20
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Neutrinos travelling faster than light?
« on: 24/03/2020 00:22:59 »
Quote from: Harri on 10/03/2020 13:30:39
Hi Halc.  That explains that then!  It's a typical knee jerk reaction from a newbie like myself when he thinks, hey something DOES travel faster than light! I guess that if the article was aimed at a non scientist like myself then it would have said the neutrinos get to Earth earlier than the light 'because ...'.
You too can travel faster than the speed of light, quite easily actually.

https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=99111&page=1
The following users thanked this post: Harri

Pages: [1] 2
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.126 seconds with 67 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.