The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Member Map
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
Life Sciences
Physiology & Medicine
flu
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
flu
2 Replies
3887 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
ukmicky
(OP)
Moderator
Naked Science Forum King!
3065
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 7 times
flu
«
on:
11/01/2006 21:52:18 »
why are doctors reluctant to give you any medecine when you catch the flu but will hand out jabs to prevent people from catching it
Michael HAPPY NEW YEAR
Logged
neilep
Withdrawnmist
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum GOD!
21027
Activity:
0.5%
Thanked: 110 times
Re: flu
«
Reply #1 on:
11/01/2006 22:04:20 »
I think it's because when you've got it, they can't cure it...just recommend some drugs to alleviate the symptoms....but having a jab will protect you from catching the prevalent strain that they suspect will be coming our way.
Men are the same as women.... just inside out !!
Logged
Men are the same as women, just inside out !
rosy
Naked Science Forum King!
1015
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 1 times
Chemistry
Re: flu
«
Reply #2 on:
11/01/2006 22:12:30 »
Er, different medecine. They'll inject *against* flu, a vaccine which decreases the risk/severity of an attack by priming the immune system to deal with this season's flu bugs, but the "medecine" that doctors won't hand out to prevent flu is antibiotics, which work against bacterial infections (depending on the bacteria and the antibiotic) but not against viral infections like flu. If prescription of antibiotics isn't going to do any good (as in an uncomplicated attack of flu) then any doctor prescribing antibiotics would be (i) increasing the likelihood of the developement of antibiotic resistance in bacteria and (ii) laying their patient open to an unnecessary risk of side effects.
Clearly, if a bout of influenza is accompanied by a bacterial infection then that's different.
Then there's tamiflu, which as I understand it is a general antiviral against influenza infections and works as a prophylactic decreasing infection risk whilst it remains in the body and also reduces the severity of an infection. BUT it seems it's about our only defence against bird flu at the moment, and flu strains are already developing a resistance, so it should be very much a drug of absolute last resort. If there is a pandemic of really virulent avian flu, as seems increasingly likely, we can't afford to have squandered it as we have many of our antibiotic drugs.
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...