101
New Theories / Re: How gravity works in spiral galaxy?
« on: 22/01/2019 03:46:02 »1. The Virtual sun host (Orange ball) is located at the same distance from the galactic disc plane while it orbits around the galaxy (gray line in one article or dashed white line in the other)?Sorry, neither of these is correct so the resultant conclusion is also wrong.
2. The Virtual sun host orbital velocity around the galaxy is lower than "the actual motion of the sun" (Green line). Less than 210 Km/s instead of 220 Km/s?
Motion and velocities are only relative based upon perspective. You are ignoring that. (I would also point out that the disk is not uniform, but consists of conical spiral arms of varying densities. That complication does not need to be considered here.)
For instance, considering the perspective of the orbits of Mercury and Venus relative to the plane of the ecliptic, we assign Mercury a velocity of 47.89 km/s and Venus one of 35.03 km/s, a large difference.
But if we consider the velocity of the Sun and its forward evolution in time relative to the CMB, and the helical distances travelled by the planets we get a much different perspective:
(in the following computations the inclination of the plane of the ecliptic is ignored and:
Planetary orbital lengths and periods are as per NASA.
Orbital periods are related to 1 Earth year.
Orbital lengths are as perceived “around the Sun”.
Helical orbital lengths are computed using the following formula:
(Distance travelled by the Sun)2 + (Orbital length)2 = (Helical length)2
The distance travelled by the Sun is relative to the CMB.
Sun velocity = 368 km/s = 11.60672*109 km/yr.)
Mercury:
Orbital length: 57.909227*106 km
Orbital period = .24 yr
Orbits/yr = 4.1666
Total orbital length = 241.249839*106 km
Helical length = 11.609226961*109 km
Velocity = 368.07948 km/s vs 47.89 km/s
Venus:
Orbital length: 10.8209475*107 km
Orbital period = .62 yr
Orbits/yr = 1.6129
Total orbital length = 17.4531062*107 km
Helical length = 11.608032143*109 km
Velocity = 368.04160 km/s vs 35.03 km/s
Earth:
Orbital length: 14.9598262*107 km
Orbital period = 1 yr
Orbits/yr = 1
Total orbital length = 14.9598262*107 km
Helical length = 11.607684041*109 km
Velocity = 368.03056 km/s vs 29.79
Mars:
Orbital length: 22.7943824*107 km
Orbital period = 1.88 yr
Orbits/yr = .5319
Total orbital length = 121.2467148*106 km
Helical length = 11.607353269*109 km
Velocity = 368.02007 km/s vs 24.13
Jupiter:
Orbital length: 778.340821*106 km
Orbital period = 11.86 yr
Orbits/yr = 0.0843
Total orbital length = 65.6273879*106 km
Helical length = 11.606905535*109 km
Velocity = 368.00588 km/s vs 13.06
Saturn:
Orbital length: 142.6666422*107 km
Orbital period = 29.46 yr
Orbits/yr = 0.0339
Total orbital length = 484.27237*105 km
Helical length = 11.606821027*109 km 12576482920
Velocity = 368.00320 km/s vs 9.64
Uranus:
Orbital length: 287.0658186*107 km
Orbital period = 84.01 yr
Orbits/yr = .0199
Total orbital length = 341.70434*105 km
Helical length = 11.606770299*109 km
Velocity = 368.00159 km/s vs 6.81
Neptune
Orbital length: 449.8396441*107 km
Orbital period = 164.8 yr
Orbits/yr = 0.0060
Total orbital length = 272.96094*105 km
Helical length = 11.606752096*109 km
Velocity = 368.00101 km/s vs 5.43
From this perspective, the velocities, or rate of evolution, of Mercury and Venus are only .038 km/s different. Note also that as we increase distance from the Sun, the velocities decrease until Neptune has a velocity only .001 km/s different from the base velocity of the Sun. Relative velocities equalize with a larger perspective. If we shift out to the local group and its apparent motion relative to the CMB of 627 km/s, the difference between the Sun and Neptune’s velocity is only .00059 km/s. Viewed as a whole, the universal evolutionary rate of evolution, and apparent resultant relative velocity, is 1: all events in space evolving forward at the same rate over a steady rate of time.
This is the evolution of the quantum continuum. This is how I tie quantum and astro- physics together.
In both perspectives, the velocity and acceleration are directly related to the difference in the rate of time (dRt)/distance so are higher in steeper gradients, and this higher apparent acceleration of events in slower time frames maintains their relative positions within the overall continuum as it evolves forward as viewed from both perspectives.
This means GR is describing the forward evolution of the continuum and the events occurring within it, rather than the evolution of events through pre-existing “curved spacetime”. It is not the masses that determine relative velocities and trajectories, but the dynamics and perspectives in time.
Again, this is extracted from my paper on Relativity found here: http://vixra.org/abs/1804.0109#comment-3850079405.
.