The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. General Science
  4. Coal To Liquids Conversion Technique
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Coal To Liquids Conversion Technique

  • 2 Replies
  • 4263 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jeromeowen (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 2
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Coal To Liquids Conversion Technique
« on: 22/12/2008 09:16:27 »
Linc Energy has entered into a Memorandum of Agreement with Syntroleum Corporation (USA), one of the world leaders in Coal To Liquids (CTL), whereby Linc has access to their CTL technology. Syntroleum has designed, built and currently operates a CTL plant in Tulsa, Oklahoma using its unique air based CTL process.

CTL is the generic term used to describe the process of converting a gas into a liquid hydrocarbon product. This technology has already been tested and proven by numerous companies including major oil companies. The combination of UCG and CTL is subsequently called Coal to Liquids (CTL), as the initial energy source is coal.

Basically, a CTL plant consists of three main processes:

Syngas Production: this process converts a solid, liquid or gas feedstock (usually natural gas) into hydrogen and carbon monoxide.

UCG syngas is already a mix of hydrogen and carbon monoxide, therefore this first process does not apply to Linc Energy.

Fischer-Tropsch (F-T) Synthesis: it is the heart of the process. The syngas is converted into liquid hydrocarbons, through a catalytic reaction using cobalt as catalyst. The syngas reacts with the cobalt, joining together simpler hydrocarbon chains contained in the gas, to create a longer liquid hydrocarbon chain (syncrude).

Refining: the liquid hydrocarbon is then filtered and refined to produce the end product fuels: LPG, Naphtha, Jet fuel and Diesel.

These end products are essentially free of sulphur, olefins, metals, alcohols and aromatics. CTL liquid fuels are superior to conventional refinery fuels.

As a part of its ongoing CTL R&D program, F-T trials have been performed at the University of Kentucky's Centre of Applied Energy Research (CAER). A similar syngas composition to the one produced at Chinchilla is being used as feedstock to determine the best catalyst, operating temperature, pressure and other variables.

After having successfully produced diesel at the University of Kentucky Linc Energy strongly believes that the partnership with Syntroleum will enhance and expedite the development of Linc Energy as a leading ultra-clean diesel producer.



Spammy link removed and blacklisted - It seems that this is a plug for investors
« Last Edit: 22/12/2008 11:15:51 by BenV »
Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 27258
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 910 times
    • View Profile
Coal To Liquids Conversion Technique
« Reply #1 on: 22/12/2008 15:22:31 »
Well, there's nothing new about FT
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fischer-Tropsch_process

At heart it turns coal into stuff that gets burned and produces CO2 which is widely thought to contribute to global warming.
While it offers some "cleanup" of the original coal - for example stripping out sulphur- it's not really that clean a technology.
It may produce ultra clean diesel, but so does biodiesel and, in principle, that can be carbon neutral.
No technology based on coal can currently do that.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline erickejah

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 346
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Parking? I make my own parking spot!!
    • View Profile
Coal To Liquids Conversion Technique
« Reply #2 on: 25/12/2008 17:48:55 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 22/12/2008 15:22:31
Well, there's nothing new about FT

There is for me
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Are Britain’s Coal fired power plants facing closure?

Started by McQueenBoard Technology

Replies: 30
Views: 12872
Last post 21/12/2013 22:06:15
by wolfekeeper
Can someone mine 102 tons of coal in 5 hours and 45 minutes w/ 1935 technology?

Started by Pseudoscience-is-malarkeyBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 23
Views: 1882
Last post 03/10/2021 10:14:31
by nicephotog
Can coal's reputation as a dirty energy source be redeemed?

Started by HadrianBoard The Environment

Replies: 8
Views: 6820
Last post 02/06/2007 02:48:18
by mark71
UK government backs coal-fired power stations

Started by DoctorBeaverBoard The Environment

Replies: 18
Views: 17249
Last post 03/04/2010 10:39:27
by Steve Leary
What are the long term effects of underground coal gasification (UGC)?

Started by chaduthzBoard Geology, Palaeontology & Archaeology

Replies: 1
Views: 4439
Last post 17/06/2008 04:14:41
by JimBob
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.128 seconds with 40 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.