0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: claudiu on 01/07/2021 21:50:01then i suspect that the light also move slower in one directionThis clearly is incorrect since all experimentation and observation indicate otherwise.
then i suspect that the light also move slower in one direction
what is this?
Quote from: The Spoon on 02/07/2021 12:26:44Quote from: claudiu on 02/07/2021 09:40:031 His nickname kryptid i don't like. No it hasn't been show to has issues.Are you really the Cat in the Hat?More often i was associated with a dog than a cat.
Quote from: claudiu on 02/07/2021 09:40:031 His nickname kryptid i don't like. No it hasn't been show to has issues.Are you really the Cat in the Hat?
1 His nickname kryptid i don't like. No it hasn't been show to has issues.
Quote from: claudiu on 02/07/2021 17:29:16what is this? It is an illustration of your failure to comprehend the difference between "This has not been proven wrong" and "This has been proven right".
You said that one way speed of light is proven to be the same in both direction and it is not.
You said that one way speed of light is proven to be the same in both direction and it is not
I invite you to leave my post if you keep trying to denigrate me.
Quote from: claudiu on 02/07/2021 17:50:29You said that one way speed of light is proven to be the same in both direction and it is notActually I said the speed of light is 'c' in all inertial frames, a statement that I am sticking by. Why waste your time trying to defend this idea you have based on your limited knowledge physics, and learn some actual physics?
I claim that the delay and the frequency gives this property to object that we call it mass.
Tell me what is wrong in this statement and with real arguments
Quote from: claudiu on 02/07/2021 19:58:56 I claim that the delay and the frequency gives this property to object that we call it mass. Why?In particular, why would that delay make the thing attract everything else in the universe?Quote from: claudiu on 02/07/2021 19:58:56 Tell me what is wrong in this statement and with real argumentsWhether it is true or not, it is irrelevant; see above.
The attraction is because of the gravity. It is like on a computer when you try to move an object with a mouse fast and the object lags behind that is mass.
No the delay only gives mass to objects, when you push an object that opposition you feel. The attraction is because of the gravity.
My knowledge are not limited i know enough and what is important.
Quote from: claudiu on 02/07/2021 20:26:42The attraction is because of the gravity. It is like on a computer when you try to move an object with a mouse fast and the object lags behind that is mass.So then why is gravity always correlated with mass?
You double the mass you don't double the gravity,
you throw two objects of different mass they fall in the same time.
you throw two objects of different mass they fall in the same time
Quote from: claudiu on 02/07/2021 20:26:42No the delay only gives mass to objects, when you push an object that opposition you feel. The attraction is because of the gravity.But mass is what gives an object gravity.You have said that something causes mass and if that is true then the thing must cause gravity.So, how does it do that?Please explain it. You have already said that you can explain it.Quote from: claudiu on 02/07/2021 19:58:56My knowledge are not limited i know enough and what is important.
Quote from: claudiu on 02/07/2021 21:17:22You double the mass you don't double the gravity,Yes, you do. If the Earth was twice as massive, it would have twice the gravitational pull. Take a look at Newton's equation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton%27s_law_of_universal_gravitation [nofollow]Gravitational attraction is linearly proportional to mass.Quote from: claudiu on 02/07/2021 21:17:22you throw two objects of different mass they fall in the same time.That's a bit misleading. The rate at which an object moves towards the Earth is indeed the same for all objects, but the Earth's acceleration towards those same objects is not the same. The Earth itself will accelerate towards a larger mass more quickly than towards a lighter mass. You just can't tell the difference by dropping objects from your hands because the Earth accelerates towards them far too slowly to observe.
Then why some planets are more massive than earth and have similar gravity to earth? Or is it the density?
Any way are you looking for flaws in my knowledge or in my theory?
The presence of the particles bends space and the force carrier particles of objects that come close are cheated to take a rotational path, they reach the quarks or what ever particles they are from different angle.