The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Profile of jerrygg38
  3. Show Posts
  4. Posts Thanked By User
  • Profile Info
    • Summary
    • Show Stats
    • Show Posts
      • Messages
      • Topics
      • Attachments
      • Thanked Posts
      • Posts Thanked By User
    • Show User Topics
      • User Created
      • User Participated In

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

  • Messages
  • Topics
  • Attachments
  • Thanked Posts
  • Posts Thanked By User

Messages - jerrygg38

Pages: [1]
1
General Science / Re: Does the earth move away from the sun when it slows down?
« on: 05/10/2016 11:50:38 »
This was worked out by Kepler, when he worked out that the planets follow ellipses around the Sun.
- The orbit sweeps out equal areas in equal time (Kepler's second law)
- When the planet is closest to the Sun (as the Earth is in January), it travels the fastest, making it swing out farther in February
- When the planet is farthest from the Sun (as the Earth is in July), it travels the slowest, making it fall in towards the Sun in August

Isaac Newton proved mathematically that only an inverse square law of gravitation can explain these orbits.

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kepler%27s_laws_of_planetary_motion
The following users thanked this post: jerrygg38

2
General Science / Re: Was Einstein wrong about E=mc^2?
« on: 27/09/2016 08:58:56 »
Scarecely relevant, but who cares? The mathematics of relativity is simple enough but I dare you to derive a maximum-entropy MRI reconstruction algorithm on the KISS principle. Not sure about drooling but I have people queuing in the street to use mine!
The following users thanked this post: jerrygg38

3
General Science / Re: For relativity, does the mass of a moving object increase in all directions?
« on: 03/09/2016 23:50:00 »
To understand exactly why relativistic mass, energy and momentum are accepted physical concepts I refer the reader to the following.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_relativistic_energy_and_momentum

Experimental confirmation trumps all.
The following users thanked this post: jerrygg38

Pages: [1]
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.059 seconds with 26 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.