1

New Theories / Re: If there was one Big Bang event, why not multiple big bangs?

« on: 24/11/2023 20:26:24 »

It seems to me that space must be infinite and time must be eternal, don't you agree?

I'm not in Disagreement,
I simply have a Different perspective.

If the BB model is Flawless...
Then Space itself had a Beginning,
And what Begins, has a Boundary.

If the Law of Entropy is Absolute...
Then Time itself has a limited time to Tick.


ps - ....nity is that which has No beginning, and that which has No end is Infi....!
0

2

New Theories / Re: If there was one Big Bang event, why not multiple big bangs?

« on: 10/09/2023 21:58:08 »

Just a small OffTopic enquiry...

Suppose, just Imagine wildly, Suppose...

The Observable Universe starts
 ' Contracting ' .

& the rate of Collapse keeps increasing or Accelerating.

Well, Irrespective of whatever amount of Time it takes for a
 ' Complete Collapse '...

What will be the End Result?
A Singularity?
A humongous BH?

ps - easy to imagine Matter coalescence, but wat da hell bout d
 " Space Continuum " ?

3

New Theories / Re: If there was one Big Bang event, why not multiple big bangs?

« on: 03/09/2023 22:49:39 »

I associate Time with Change.
& Entropy with the Flow of Energy.

But i do Wonder, what was the nature of Time, before the BB?

A Time without Atoms or Light or Matter or Entropy...
Should i even refer to it as " Time " ?


A Space before " Space " is easier in comparison to think of.

But just bcoz the " Egg " inside which i reside, has a yolk & white...
Should i assume or conclude that the ' Hen ' is made of yolk..
& the ' Coop ' is filled with white.


ps - Imagination needs no Wings nor Sky for Flight.
But remains Confined in the Skullcage, such is it's Plight.

4

New Theories / Re: If there was one Big Bang event, why not multiple big bangs?

« on: 27/08/2023 22:07:10 »

This Thread is my Favourite section on TNS.
For a very Simple reason, it's here that i find folks who are Able to Think ' Out of the Box ' .


Fundamental Forces.
Entropy.
Time.
Exist " Inside " our Observable Universe.

But if there is an " Outside "...
Is it a compulsion or mandatory for all those Things to be Present in the same Form exhibiting the same Nature as within?


Definitions Matter Alot!
Perhaps We should come up with New terms or verbiage to describe Space/Time before the Big Bang.


ps - the Egg was a symbolic representation of the universe, our universe, the one within which We exist.
No egg meaning no hen & no coop.

Retro-Causality negating Quantum Sciences, is not Observed within our Box.
But can We be certain of it's non-existentiality out of da box?

In my limited understanding, i do not know anything physical, which has
' No Motion ' or " Motionless " .
Perhaps one of you could help me out with an example.

pps - Only Dreamerz know this...
In Stables of the Mind..
Unicorns Exist.
: )

5

General Science / Re: Broad (Fava) Beans: Difference between frozen & fresh

« on: 27/08/2023 20:18:35 »

Pesticides?

Or some chemical reaction that takes time, hence the water color changes?

Is it a possibility that Beans harvested during Different time periods vary alike seasonal changes?

6

New Theories / Re: If there was one Big Bang event, why not multiple big bangs?

« on: 20/08/2023 22:33:06 »

We know time passes, but the beginning of time is not easily established. Was there a beginning, or has time been passing eternally? I ask those who notice this topic to comment about their views, for discussion.


204094,

I'd very much like to Discuss this a bit more if you are Interested.

Imagine a Still Image of an Egg.
Now another Still Image of a Cracked Egg.
Now imagine a plate of scrambled egg or sunny side up as per preference.

Obviously, All the above imagined images would have Different Time slots.
(egg-t1, crack-t2, served-t3)

If the Egg is a Fundamentally essential object, without which, no still images can be imagined.
No Changes conceived.
No movement, Nothing!

Can We then conclude, Without the Egg, Time does not Exist.

How do We really measure Time?
By Flow of Entropy?

& How do We measure Entropy without the Existence of molecules, atoms, electrons, protons, quarks etc etc?

ps - prapz We exist inside off of the egg & prapz We might never be able to come out of our shell.
But that should Not stop Us from Imagining a Coop!

7

New Theories / Re: If there was one Big Bang event, why not multiple big bangs?

« on: 06/08/2023 22:18:37 »

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_energy

ps - Hope Eternal is Okay n doin Well!

8

Science Experiments / Re: Investigation on diffraction of light

« on: 06/08/2023 21:18:10 »

I've been avoiding to post Utube vids...anywayz, here it is...

Thanks & Credits & Source -
Mithuna Yoganathan/Looking Glass Universe(channel)/YouTube.

9

New Theories / Re: If there was one Big Bang event, why not multiple big bangs?

« on: 09/07/2023 22:27:39 »

OK, so no one is arguing against an infinite and eternal universe, but that door is always open to anyone who wants to try a convincing argument.

Without Evidence ' for ' & ' against ' it...No Argument is a Convincing one, rather Futile.

 In the mean time, I like to philosophize about there being just one universe, and only one. It would be an infinite and eternal universe that has always existed and will always exist.

Well, if you are Philosophizing...then Why just stop there.
How bout Infinite & Eternal Multiverses?

That is what I would call a solid foundation to build on. Would it then be safe to say that the infinite universe is full of an infinite amount of matter and energy which are the building blocks of everything in the physical universe? I think so.

Solid Foundations are not Safe.
Earthquakes do Not kill people,
Buildings Do!

198933,199094,

" If We come from Nothing...
Go back to Nothing..
What then, have We truly Lost?
NOTHING! "
(Monty)

ps - ( : Welcome Back : )

10

Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution / Re: Has natural selection been nullified in humans ?

« on: 05/07/2023 21:46:30 »

Zer0, one species of ant consumes only a fungus which they grow underground. Another herds aphids for their sugary excretions.

This Thread has taken an interesting turn & seems intriguing.
Hope the @OP is Fine with it?
(btw any preference for reference? like PC or Pete or Petro ?
Plz do lemme know)

A few more ruling outs...
Sonar...Bats.
Night vision...Owls.
Infrared...Snakes.

Gosh!
I heard the Egyptian Dung Beetle tracks positions in moonless nights using the Milky Way Galaxy.

Was thinking, what about the act of commiting Suicide?
& Then i found this...WoW!

https://www.popsci.com/insect-self-sacrifice-exploding/

11

General Science / Re: How does ChatGPT work?

« on: 03/07/2023 20:47:02 »

A tad bit Worrying...

Nobody knows how it Works.
Opens up the possibility of it Miscalculating.

If 99 times out of 100, it says 2+2=4, & gets it wrong once, is Totally Fine.

Can only Hope autonomous ai systems won't be deployed for Nukes.

99.999% accuracy with an Error margin of just 00.001% will be
Game Over!

Humans have even higher error rates. Nonetheless, we survive, so far. Even with nukes available for decades.
What's needed is some reliable system for check and balance, and acceptable common goals.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanislav_Petrov

12

Science Experiments / Re: Double | slit | Experiment?

« on: 18/06/2023 20:22:57 »

Yup!
It indeed is BS.
Propagated by certain Utubers as clickbaits to get more n more views.

The tree falling would create a shockwave.
The surrounding ground could be tested for clues.

The moon at times isn't visible, but tides exist.
Also moon formed before, abiogenesis later.

It is just a Probability of the cat being dead or alive, the final possibility ain't dual in nature.

I'm Sure you All have seen stuff online sayin " Physicists prove Reality is not Real " & " Scientists confirm the Universe doesn't Exist ".

Lay folks like me read up all this Stuff n feel soo cool & good.
Until we bump into a REAL scientist...
It doesn't end well for us.
: (

Philosophy, Religion, Politics are Plagued sure enough.
But Science has a few bad rats too!
(sorry)

13

New Theories / Re: What are they saying about Quantum Gravity?

« on: 11/06/2023 21:25:46 »

It's not the ' Holding On ' that always makes Us stronger in life...

Sometimes, it's the ' Letting go ' .

14

Chemistry / Re: Why Choose Full Lace Remy Hair Bundles?

« on: 11/06/2023 19:50:59 »

Hmm...how did sxgrt know about the Spam Link?

Links were Removed from the OP's original message.

But when sxgrt Quoted the OP post, the Spam Link is right in there.

How's that Possible?

15

New Theories / Re: If there was one Big Bang event, why not multiple big bangs?

« on: 04/06/2023 20:25:45 »

No hurries n No worries...
Please take your time..
& Get Well Soon!

: )

16

New Theories / Re: the forgotten aether,2023

« on: 31/05/2023 18:58:43 »

Hello Trevor & welcome back!

Could you propose an Experiment to test the validity of " Aether " ?

(a simple ' cando@hometest ' which doesn't require billions of dollars)

17

New Theories / Re: Newest Quantum Gravity and Theory of Everything, TOE

« on: 29/05/2023 22:44:43 »

What about the convexity of a 2-d square microgrid...
Would that yield Anti-Gravity?

18

New Theories / Re: If there was one Big Bang event, why not multiple big bangs?

« on: 20/05/2023 21:21:04 »

The OP is a young lad, clearly teenaged at heart, & infant in the brain.
(lol sorry!)

If i were Him, i wouldn't worry much.
Besides, We got no time to waste.
Gotta ponder about the Imponderables yes!

So the side questions were...

1) Is the Pioneer Anomaly resolved?
2) Infinity has no end point, but does it have a starting point?

ps - An apple a day, keeps doctors away.
But if the nurse is a pretty fay...
Then throw the damm apple away!
; )

19

New Theories / Re: If there was one Big Bang event, why not multiple big bangs?

« on: 18/05/2023 20:55:12 »

Why did this Thread go dead?

Apologies if that Silly Utube video mentioned Hurt y'all.

Please do Modify or Remove any posts of mine, as applicable.


Questions are Causes, Answers Effects.
Seeking Knowledge, lessens Defects.

20

Just Chat! / Re: Is there a universal moral standard?

« on: 17/05/2023 00:08:11 »

The other alternative is to go extinct with the destruction of the earth.

Best of all would be for humanity to extinguish and let the earth recover.

Or build an Arkenterprise, load it with genetic dna seeds, & simply ditch Earth for its own Good.

Life without Us on Earth will Thrive,
Intelligence will make sure We Survive!