Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I think you aren't being honest. Men are the best scientists. Women are only second-rate. Isn't that true?If you truly believe that remark, I can feel only sympathy for you my friend. Give the ladies a break, they are equal and capable individuals in many respects.
Why do people post here?Mission accomplished zx16..............................
It's not because they want to get scientific enlightenment. It's because of this - they want to see their posts displayed.
Eat less food.Your literary prowess is staggering.
Why should girls study "Physics"? It's blatantly and obviously unnatural. Girls should marry healthy men, then give birth to children.Speaking of crippled remarks, many consider this posture of yours to be a bit lame to be honest.
Everyone can see that. Except for the fools crippled by political correctness.
Fat people eat too much food.I'll assume you consider that remark to be a profound observation..............................?
We all know the answer. But we dare not say what it is.We're all interested in answers zx16, why not share with us?
Who wants "capitalists" and "communists", they are stupid and just cause wars. I want people who are interested in science. The rest can go away.Try searching out the topics that interest you zx16, we have a great deal of science here at TNS. Enjoy..............................................
For the greater part, I agree with your comments. There is one exception however, and that would be what follows:
With capitalism, a middle class will appear and capitalist have more checks and balances, due to a detached government and free market forces. When it comes to human nature, capitalism is the lessor of two evils, since it has more checks and balances. Unlike the socialist, the capitalist cannot control law and law enforcement to make it easier for yourself. The choices of Castro were such it did not diminish his wealth or his ability to name his successor. Capitalists can't do that due to checks and balances. You can't dictate your products have to be bought if they are second rated but the only show in town, due monopoly laws of big government. You need to produce value, which creates wealth, which allows a middle class.
Reflections in the mirror...................................Think about it!You mean Donald TrumpIsn't all this stuff about "Capitalists" crap.Do you know what the phrase "self referential" means?
There are real people who are interested in Science. All the rest are just stupid, murderous, wastes of space.
As this thread progresses, the intelligent observer might reckon that the title of it could have, more appropriately read: "The theory that every member listens except for one. Enter Thebox."
So I ask you once again what is it that gives motion to the electron? If you have this than you have something worth listening to.
And the psychological downside of communism is that it conditions the population to work only hard enough to stay out of the Gulag. The incentive to achieve beyond necessary means is stolen from the individual and replaced with a false sense of social safeguard. And according to your statement: "to only give of themselves in return for something", America should lag far behind China and Russia if that were actually true. Facts are; America, with it's Capitalistic framework far out does all Communistic societies when it comes to aide to poorer countries. And the ability for America to be so generous is the direct result of it's ability to create profit.
You see the psychological downside of capitalism is that it conditions the population to only give of themselves in return for something.
What is recognizably simple is the following; The Box will continue to believe what ever he chooses to believe, whether it can be supported by experimental evidence or not. The Box is apparently satisfied believing what ever sounds comfortable to his logic and it is a fruitless effort to try and reason with him. He accepts neither Einstein nor the tenants of GR or SR. So why would any of us expect him to accept anything the esteemed members of this noble assemble have to offer?
No I do not think something from nothing is simple.
I wasn't directing my observations specifically at you Nilak, error is common to us all. I think you may have misunderstood to whom I was directing these observations. For the greater part, you and I agree.
Yes but he is starting with the idea that creationism is definitely true fact. This means when he searches for errors he looks somewere else not in the idea of creationism.
Truly Colin................If the current trend is any indicator, we may need to go "Back to the future". Good grammar appears to be a thing of the past, if I might say.And much later by grammar....Much, much later. Some time in the future maybe.
Searching out our errors and understanding them is great therapy and prepares us for new insight into many mysteries. If we do not seek out our personal errors, we are prepared to learn nothing.
I'm not even trying to convince you that you are definitely wrong. All I want you to do is to realize that there is a chance you might be wrong.
So stop acting like nerds with glasses and scientist, rather repent, and thou shalt be saved.People are not going to be receptive to preachers that come shouting insults and making demands that they repent. Repent to whom, to you? BTW, repentance means to "change", and if you ever expect to sway others to your beliefs, you'll need to "change" your delivery, do it with love and not demands.
Very true GoC, but not in the terms which TheBox has suggested. One does not create new space by expanding their lungs, such a suggestion has no merit.QuoteSpace is just a place where physicality can exist.
I suspect we need to define physicality. Anything that has a measured distance exists physically and has substance. Even space. Without substance there would be no measured distance between objects.