The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution
  4. Just read "Evolution Through the Looking Glass", I do not agree...
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Just read "Evolution Through the Looking Glass", I do not agree...

  • 5 Replies
  • 5866 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mangalmurti (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 1
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Just read "Evolution Through the Looking Glass", I do not agree...
« on: 10/03/2011 13:40:04 »
the author asserts that there would be paradigm shift, and that natural selection would be displaced as cause of evolution.

my understanding, it is the ability to adapt to the changes that occcur from the happy accidents, that then allows species to adapt, and if they have the ability to adapt, or they have a trait that confers an advantage when an "accident" occurs, they are selected rather than those organisms that do not, naturally!   hence, natural selection still is the actual process that occurs
Logged
 



Offline Jolly- Joliver

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 584
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
Just read "Evolution Through the Looking Glass", I do not agree...
« Reply #1 on: 29/03/2011 17:39:18 »
Quote from: Mangalmurti on 10/03/2011 13:40:04
the author asserts that there would be paradigm shift, and that natural selection would be displaced as cause of evolution.

my understanding, it is the ability to adapt to the changes that occcur from the happy accidents, that then allows species to adapt, and if they have the ability to adapt, or they have a trait that confers an advantage when an "accident" occurs, they are selected rather than those organisms that do not, naturally!   hence, natural selection still is the actual process that occurs

Paradigm shifts are not really a thing I think a Mammel or Lizard are really going to be effected by.

I think the point relates far more to human evolution and not other life, ofcourse a human paradigm shift could effect other life.
Logged
What am I doing thinking about science?

http://www.youtube.com/user/Wiybit

Where do you go? Yours with love JOLLY
 

Offline Monox D. I-Fly

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 446
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 7 times
    • View Profile
Re: Just read "Evolution Through the Looking Glass", I do not agree...
« Reply #2 on: 17/04/2018 07:58:59 »
Quote from: Jolly- Joliver on 29/03/2011 17:39:18
Paradigm shifts are not really a thing I think a Mammel or Lizard are really going to be effected by.
What is a Mammel? Is it related to Mammoth?
Logged
 

Offline syhprum

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 5164
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 70 times
    • View Profile
Re: Just read "Evolution Through the Looking Glass", I do not agree...
« Reply #3 on: 17/04/2018 10:46:06 »
The spelling Mammel looked unfamiliar to me so I checked it out it is of course the singular of Mammals the group to which Mammoths belonged.
Logged
syhprum
 

Offline Monox D. I-Fly

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 446
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 7 times
    • View Profile
Re: Just read "Evolution Through the Looking Glass", I do not agree...
« Reply #4 on: 03/10/2018 09:17:18 »
Wait... Are you telling me that "Mammal" wasn't an actual word?
Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 27489
  • Activity:
    84%
  • Thanked: 926 times
    • View Profile
Re: Just read "Evolution Through the Looking Glass", I do not agree...
« Reply #5 on: 03/10/2018 20:03:37 »
Quote from: syhprum on 17/04/2018 10:46:06
Mammel
Did this happen?

Showing results for Mammal
Search instead for Mammel
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Have you read the latest Royal Society report on climate change?

Started by imatfaalBoard The Environment

Replies: 1
Views: 3919
Last post 01/10/2010 16:21:01
by Geezer
Buy useless spam Weight Loss Pills | don’t Read The Review

Started by ramandamaBoard General Science

Replies: 1
Views: 1754
Last post 16/10/2019 17:58:49
by Colin2B
NUCLEAR FALLOUT is CARBON-14 = GLOBAL WARMING?? Please Read

Started by jason2679302Board Chemistry

Replies: 4
Views: 7778
Last post 09/02/2007 14:29:57
by chris
How many papers do you need to burn to read a news paper online?

Started by Adrian Board Technology

Replies: 16
Views: 13819
Last post 06/03/2009 23:30:27
by lyner
Does Google read email attachments in Gmail accounts ?

Started by RDBoard Geek Speak

Replies: 3
Views: 11473
Last post 17/03/2012 06:45:27
by yor_on
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.254 seconds with 49 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.