The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. A question about universal expansion.
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

A question about universal expansion.

  • 4 Replies
  • 3001 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ethos_ (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1332
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 17 times
    • View Profile
A question about universal expansion.
« on: 02/11/2013 15:56:23 »
Which concept of universal expansion is in the majority?

1. The expansion of space can only be expressed by the measure of distance between material objects within it.

Or.............

2. The expansion of space can only be expressed by the expanding metric of space itself.

There seems to be some controversy over this and I would really like to explore how the members here at NSF view this question.

Many thanks for your consideration...............Ethos_

Logged
"The more things change, the more they remain the same."
 



Offline Pmb

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1838
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Physicist
    • View Profile
    • New England Science Constortium
Re: A question about universal expansion.
« Reply #1 on: 02/11/2013 18:27:28 »
(1) can’t be taken literally since it’s necessary but not sufficient for that to be true. By this I mean that just because the distance between two objects is increasing it doesn’t mean that the space is increasing. After all the distance between a plane and an airport increases it doesn’t mean that the space between us and the plane is increasing.

(2) also can’t be taken literally since that is merely a description of the space which one assumes to be expanding
Logged
 

Offline Ethos_ (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1332
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 17 times
    • View Profile
Re: A question about universal expansion.
« Reply #2 on: 02/11/2013 22:53:08 »
Quote from: Pmb on 02/11/2013 18:27:28
(1) can’t be taken literally since it’s necessary but not sufficient for that to be true. By this I mean that just because the distance between two objects is increasing it doesn’t mean that the space is increasing.
So, are you saying that the expansion is not an expansion of the metric itself? That it is just the observed increase in distance between objects resulting from the energy release which occurred at the Big Bang. Or are you saying that both scenarios might be possible, and that we may not be able to distinguish between which of the two is at work?
« Last Edit: 02/11/2013 23:07:49 by Ethos_ »
Logged
"The more things change, the more they remain the same."
 

Offline Pmb

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1838
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Physicist
    • View Profile
    • New England Science Constortium
Re: A question about universal expansion.
« Reply #3 on: 02/11/2013 23:59:59 »
Quote from: Ethos_ l
So, are you saying that the expansion is not an expansion of the metric itself?
I really don’t understand what you mean when you say “expansion of the metric.”

Can you explain what you mean by that, please? 
Logged
 

Offline Ethos_ (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1332
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 17 times
    • View Profile
Re: A question about universal expansion.
« Reply #4 on: 03/11/2013 00:12:35 »
Quote from: Pmb on 02/11/2013 23:59:59
Quote from: Ethos_ l
So, are you saying that the expansion is not an expansion of the metric itself?
I really don’t understand what you mean when you say “expansion of the metric.”

Can you explain what you mean by that, please?
I'm sorry Pete, this is a term I have seen used to define the fabric of space.

http://burro.cwru.edu/Academics/Astr328/Notes/Metrics/metrics.html
« Last Edit: 03/11/2013 00:29:57 by Ethos_ »
Logged
"The more things change, the more they remain the same."
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Binary ? or not Binary ?.....that is the question

Started by neilepBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 4
Views: 6458
Last post 14/09/2005 03:23:59
by neilep
Living On The Moon (Moon question 2) et al !

Started by neilepBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 10
Views: 10243
Last post 10/04/2009 12:44:22
by Don_1
A question about dark matter/dark energy

Started by Deltajackal77Board Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 3
Views: 5656
Last post 12/10/2014 14:14:29
by chiralSPO
I'd Like PAIN..in fact...make it a double ? ( a question about Pain)

Started by neilepBoard Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 5
Views: 6287
Last post 15/10/2019 13:27:37
by LucasT
Can you answer my question about "wet dreams" and masturbation please?

Started by SimulatedBoard Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 60
Views: 41555
Last post 03/10/2018 04:37:46
by Monox D. I-Fly
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.148 seconds with 45 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.