OK, so, in two successive posts you say that you want more science but in the second you say that you want less science.
Feel free to make up your mind.The thing about the global warming debate is that it can endlessly get into the pysics of how CO2 does or does not absorb IR.
I am unable to comment on that as I don't know anything about it.
So this thread is asking to look at the debate assuming that it does make the world warmer. What then? Is there actually anything bad about a warmer world?If you were to actually cite some science we could look at if there was any credibility to that.
Then we could look at how much of a thing it was.
If it was significant then You would have done it.
Each time you avoid doing it you make the point that you have no such science.
I have been very clear;
I want to see if there is any science that supports the idea that a slightly warmer world is a bad thing.
Not science about if that warmer world will happen. At least not in this thread.
That you will try any trick or evaision says it all as to there being no such science.