Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side => Famous Scientists, Doctors and Inventors => Topic started by: Raghavendra on 19/01/2009 08:29:05
-
Please send open answers
-
What do you mean?
-
which scientist
-
But I thought you were close to getting to infinity?
-
Which scientist do you think it'll be?
-
Infinite value is it.
Sounds nice, but for what?
Quite a promise.
-
I have a value for infinity, trouble is, it goes on a bit!!!
If someone came up with a value for infinity, surely they could never write it down, since it would go on for ever!!!! Wouldn't it???
Or would it be something like (XYZ)recurring. So perhaps 'πr' is what you want.
I have absolutely no idea what I'm bubbling on about, but perhaps you had already figured that out!
-
You can't "invent infinity value".
-
You re-invent it [:)]
-
Whoever invents it, I'm going to add 1 to it.
-
I'll square it [:)]
-
I'll divide by the number I first thought of.
-
What's that going to do?!?!?!?
-
What's that going to do?!?!?!?
Does it really matter?
-
YES!
-
Of course it matters! Infinitely so!
-
Well, it looks like this though.
∞
-
∞ + 1
-
∞ + 14
-
∞∞
-
∞∞ + 1
-
[diagram=429_0]
-
This guy did quite a lot on infinity, including proving that there are at least two different infinities- one is bigger than the other.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Cantor
-
∞∞ + (∞∞ x ∞∞)∞
-
Is this going to go on ad infinitum?
(https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fbestsmileys.com%2Flol%2F4.gif&hash=dc0017defb1737ae43c0ff6efcb35b2a)
-
∞∞ + (∞∞ x ∞∞)∞
Is this going to go on ad infinitum?
(https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fbestsmileys.com%2Flol%2F4.gif&hash=dc0017defb1737ae43c0ff6efcb35b2a)
Well, it shouldn't, because:
∞∞ + (∞∞ x ∞∞)∞ still equals ∞
It'll probably be ad nauseum
-
I'm getting ∞∞ ads.
-
I'm getting ∞∞ ads.
Would that be Google Ad∞∞ium?
-
You mean G∞gle Ad∞∞ium?
Yes.
-
But of course, my mistake. How remiss of me!
-
∞∞ + (∞∞ x ∞∞)∞
looking for the = sign have you forgot it?
-
Ah, very clever sir! (https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fbestsmileys.com%2Fclapping%2F2.gif&hash=f3ac90d0f104dd89dbe260c598e013a8)(https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fbestsmileys.com%2Fclapping%2F2.gif&hash=f3ac90d0f104dd89dbe260c598e013a8)
-
If i am not wrong i have an answer for the infinity only for space w.r.t to time
I will not exlain in detail it is to be proved ∞= [6.28522 + D] &
∞=
n+1
(6.2852)
(6.28522)
-
If i am not wrong i have an
That's the problem, I think you are. Unless you can show clear evidence and actually explain it.
-
If i am not wrong i have an answer for the infinity only for space w.r.t to time
I will not exlain in detail it is to be proved ∞= [6.28522 + D] &
∞=
n+1
(6.2852)
(6.28522)
Actually to understand what u r speaking off need some proof to get digested so explain in detail or what is the use of that hint u have given here????????
-
Why are you telling us then!
-
infinity value... i was just checking out anybody would ask relation on this topic that's why? i said
-
Well I did ask and you haven't given me any evidence at all.
-
But you didn't say the complete thing so hard thing for us is to belive you so If u don't put full info then don't use hints .........it really confuses, and affects the people viewing thread just see a hint which is nothing to understand in that .......
-
ok i will explain
-
Go on, do it.
-
O.k start a new thread in New theories subject and explain in detail what did u want to say above regarding new value of infinity o.k
-
Hey Raghavendra got the value of infinity value or not what happened y r u not posting