221
New Theories / Re: What exactly gravity is?
« on: 31/07/2016 07:41:33 »
Mr Alex siqueira,
In my view, whatever thing it may, total credit for identifying gravity goes to Mr.Newton only. Where as Mr.Einstein spent most of time on experiments to identify existence of gravity.
01 Gravitational redshift
02 Gravitational time dilation.
Having formulated the relativistic, geometric version of the effects of gravity, the question of gravity's source remains. In Newtonian gravity, the source is mass. In special relativity, mass turns out to be part of a more general quantity called the energy–momentum tensor, which includes both energy and momentum densities as well as stress. Einstein was almost near to the point, however he was confused and he could not locate huge amount of energy already present on this earth. He moved to curvature of space time and thought that it is raising gravitational radiation.
But it is true that electromagnetic waves emitted by stars is too small to measure and its effect on objects, on planets is very limited. In case if it is so means, suppose let us assume that mass weight of an object is 10 kgs and its gravitational weight is 10 kgs than total weight of the mass is 20 kgs and when it is giving additional weight of 10 kgs on simple mass, what about its influence on the total universe.
It is true that energy moves from high to low area and it is of course a simple phenomena. In our universe sun is emitting lot of energy into universe. Similarly binary stars also and whatever quantity of energy they may emit, energy moves from high pressure areas to low pressure and thus spreads to new areas and existence of space fabric is also in question. Due to attraction in between electrons, they keep together in the form of rays and these rays carrys energy from one place to other place. Initially energy start establishing base and due to pressure some of the rays moves to longer distances.
Dark energy is also another important area to be studied carefully. Actually, due to attraction energy tries to exist in the form of base, and the other area where there is no energy is termed as vacuum or dark energy. In my view this is rarest thing. Energy entering dark energy area, as there is no mass or energy, it simply moves out to other area where there is concentration of mass or energy base. Chances of dark energy creating pressure on objects in a planet is remote.
Actually i had seen one of my friend carrying out a simple test, taking water in a bucket, closing outside, vacuuming and showing how water escalates. Here we have to remember one important point that we are living on this earth where there is huge amount of energy which is influencing each and every thing. This energy is creating lot of pressure on surface of the water and it is also penetrating deeply. When you try to create vacuum, energy along with mass moves out, and pressure on water is lost and water tries to escalate and one more important point is that pressure inside water is high when compared to outside and therefore energy within water tries to occupy this gap.
Your point of view:
A molten iron and rock outercore would be able to "conserve heat much more efficient than a gas or some other elements, like sun the hello produces much more heat but will not be as good as magma when in terms of absorbing the acceleration...
Let us take two or three iron pieces and place them in open area. First one of course absorbs lot of heat and passes a part of which to next one. See, what ever matter it may, when energy moves from one matter to other, due to obstruction created by mass, it slows down and gets reduced. Think, how much energy, matter can absorb and passes it to inner core. Here comparison is in between iron and rock outer core to gas or other light elements. This is an exceptional/rare case and is to be studied as such and not to be taken as main item.
Your point of view:
Things seems to be lighter on the moon, cause the moon "where it stands" is not big enough, and or also does not have a appropriated outercore to generate electromagnetism enough to push back the outer expansion over it... The same case as mars, but mars once in a much earlier solar system probably had it's magnetosphere as we do, "
In my view it is not outer core or size that determine independent existence of any planet, but it is the amount of energy released by the planet and the climate that determines independent existence of planet. Suppose if the moon is releasing lot of energy into open area, than strong energy rays will hit earth and distance will increase and moon will move away to far away distances. Climate is also another important point that determine very existence of planet. Suppose if any planet is not having strong climate that sun rays will hit directly and energy rays penetrate deeply and creates pressure on one side of the planet. whereas on the other side, as there is no climate, dark energy prevails and it has no capacity to maintain the planet in its original place and planet start moving away. Climate is aslo key factor in the rotation and revolution of any planet.
Since moon is already cooled to a great extent, it is not releasing strong energy rays into the space and it is also not having strong climate. So it is mainly depending on the energy rays coming from earth.
Your point of view:
About different gravitational pull over an one planet, there is many influences, such as the stars and moons around you, but in case of earth do you want to blame someone for the different magnetic fields, blame the diversity of elements on the inner layers, and also blame the oceans and their depth, the liquid salt water is the one to blame for earth magnetosphere holes..
yeah, we have so many options to blame. If the choice is not right we will go for more options to blame for. if the moon is moving away from us means, there may be so many reasons, earth may be releasing more energy and strong energy rays may be hitting moon. The other option is moon to release more energy, which is almost ruled out.
Your point of view:
What I mean is "the apple, has never felt from the tree", it was pushed by the dark energy acceleration
Dark energy is unknown form of energy presumed to be exist througt the space. It is also said to be causing expansion of universe. Dark energy is thought to be very homogeneous, not very dense and is not known to interact through any of the fundamental forces other than gravity. Expansion of the universe is common thing and i do not know, why and how this was linked to gravity.
In my view, energy is the base for air movement, when energy start establishing base, water within that area evaporates, start moving, light molecules raises from the earth and start moving. Here if water is to create gravity means total hydrosphere must come down to earth. Energy is having an important quality of moving from high area to low and this is movement of air.
We are now searching for gravity waves, and somebody says we have found them. We are experiencing gravity on earth, but we are searching for gravity waves from stars. we also link it to the outer expansion of universe and also link it to outer surface of the planet and to inner expansion. We take exceptional/rare things and link them to gravity.
Ok, let us take a simple example which is causing force/pressure on objects on the earth. We are all taking this as
atmosphere pressure and where as gravity is taken as attraction in between objects. We are all using borewell motors to pump water and this is working with the help of atmosphere pressure only. What exactly is creating pressure on water in deep bore well, it is not, oxygen, nitrogen or dust particles, but it is energy only. Charging of energy rays is causing heat and creating pressure on surface of sea water and to evaporate or sea water cannot evaporate by itself. Three cycles of the water is possible means it is due to energy pressure only. First of all we have to acknowledge that there is energy base on this earth and it is helping in:
01 Normal functioning of nature.
02 Water taking three cycles.
03 It is not allowing temparature to fall extra-ordinarily during night time.
04 It is also aiding some of the key functions such as:
a) fire
b) light
c) explosions
d) and others
Small amount of energy coming from sun after escaping hydrosphere is giving lot of light and heat means it is due to energy base only. Hydrosphere existing against our planet never allows energy to escape into space that much easily and at the same time it never allows excess energy to pass on to the planet. It is indeed providing us a comfortable, dry, wet climate suitable for the existence of nature. Energy coming from earth is acting as support to this base.
For that how the barometer is working and how time dilation is proved to be correct. It is due to energy pressure,
barometer is raising and it is due to gravitational waves i.e., energy rays present on the earth that time dilation and gravitational red shift is proved to be correct.
Yours
Psreddy.
In my view, whatever thing it may, total credit for identifying gravity goes to Mr.Newton only. Where as Mr.Einstein spent most of time on experiments to identify existence of gravity.
01 Gravitational redshift
02 Gravitational time dilation.
Having formulated the relativistic, geometric version of the effects of gravity, the question of gravity's source remains. In Newtonian gravity, the source is mass. In special relativity, mass turns out to be part of a more general quantity called the energy–momentum tensor, which includes both energy and momentum densities as well as stress. Einstein was almost near to the point, however he was confused and he could not locate huge amount of energy already present on this earth. He moved to curvature of space time and thought that it is raising gravitational radiation.
But it is true that electromagnetic waves emitted by stars is too small to measure and its effect on objects, on planets is very limited. In case if it is so means, suppose let us assume that mass weight of an object is 10 kgs and its gravitational weight is 10 kgs than total weight of the mass is 20 kgs and when it is giving additional weight of 10 kgs on simple mass, what about its influence on the total universe.
It is true that energy moves from high to low area and it is of course a simple phenomena. In our universe sun is emitting lot of energy into universe. Similarly binary stars also and whatever quantity of energy they may emit, energy moves from high pressure areas to low pressure and thus spreads to new areas and existence of space fabric is also in question. Due to attraction in between electrons, they keep together in the form of rays and these rays carrys energy from one place to other place. Initially energy start establishing base and due to pressure some of the rays moves to longer distances.
Dark energy is also another important area to be studied carefully. Actually, due to attraction energy tries to exist in the form of base, and the other area where there is no energy is termed as vacuum or dark energy. In my view this is rarest thing. Energy entering dark energy area, as there is no mass or energy, it simply moves out to other area where there is concentration of mass or energy base. Chances of dark energy creating pressure on objects in a planet is remote.
Actually i had seen one of my friend carrying out a simple test, taking water in a bucket, closing outside, vacuuming and showing how water escalates. Here we have to remember one important point that we are living on this earth where there is huge amount of energy which is influencing each and every thing. This energy is creating lot of pressure on surface of the water and it is also penetrating deeply. When you try to create vacuum, energy along with mass moves out, and pressure on water is lost and water tries to escalate and one more important point is that pressure inside water is high when compared to outside and therefore energy within water tries to occupy this gap.
Your point of view:
A molten iron and rock outercore would be able to "conserve heat much more efficient than a gas or some other elements, like sun the hello produces much more heat but will not be as good as magma when in terms of absorbing the acceleration...
Let us take two or three iron pieces and place them in open area. First one of course absorbs lot of heat and passes a part of which to next one. See, what ever matter it may, when energy moves from one matter to other, due to obstruction created by mass, it slows down and gets reduced. Think, how much energy, matter can absorb and passes it to inner core. Here comparison is in between iron and rock outer core to gas or other light elements. This is an exceptional/rare case and is to be studied as such and not to be taken as main item.
Your point of view:
Things seems to be lighter on the moon, cause the moon "where it stands" is not big enough, and or also does not have a appropriated outercore to generate electromagnetism enough to push back the outer expansion over it... The same case as mars, but mars once in a much earlier solar system probably had it's magnetosphere as we do, "
In my view it is not outer core or size that determine independent existence of any planet, but it is the amount of energy released by the planet and the climate that determines independent existence of planet. Suppose if the moon is releasing lot of energy into open area, than strong energy rays will hit earth and distance will increase and moon will move away to far away distances. Climate is also another important point that determine very existence of planet. Suppose if any planet is not having strong climate that sun rays will hit directly and energy rays penetrate deeply and creates pressure on one side of the planet. whereas on the other side, as there is no climate, dark energy prevails and it has no capacity to maintain the planet in its original place and planet start moving away. Climate is aslo key factor in the rotation and revolution of any planet.
Since moon is already cooled to a great extent, it is not releasing strong energy rays into the space and it is also not having strong climate. So it is mainly depending on the energy rays coming from earth.
Your point of view:
About different gravitational pull over an one planet, there is many influences, such as the stars and moons around you, but in case of earth do you want to blame someone for the different magnetic fields, blame the diversity of elements on the inner layers, and also blame the oceans and their depth, the liquid salt water is the one to blame for earth magnetosphere holes..
yeah, we have so many options to blame. If the choice is not right we will go for more options to blame for. if the moon is moving away from us means, there may be so many reasons, earth may be releasing more energy and strong energy rays may be hitting moon. The other option is moon to release more energy, which is almost ruled out.
Your point of view:
What I mean is "the apple, has never felt from the tree", it was pushed by the dark energy acceleration
Dark energy is unknown form of energy presumed to be exist througt the space. It is also said to be causing expansion of universe. Dark energy is thought to be very homogeneous, not very dense and is not known to interact through any of the fundamental forces other than gravity. Expansion of the universe is common thing and i do not know, why and how this was linked to gravity.
In my view, energy is the base for air movement, when energy start establishing base, water within that area evaporates, start moving, light molecules raises from the earth and start moving. Here if water is to create gravity means total hydrosphere must come down to earth. Energy is having an important quality of moving from high area to low and this is movement of air.
We are now searching for gravity waves, and somebody says we have found them. We are experiencing gravity on earth, but we are searching for gravity waves from stars. we also link it to the outer expansion of universe and also link it to outer surface of the planet and to inner expansion. We take exceptional/rare things and link them to gravity.
Ok, let us take a simple example which is causing force/pressure on objects on the earth. We are all taking this as
atmosphere pressure and where as gravity is taken as attraction in between objects. We are all using borewell motors to pump water and this is working with the help of atmosphere pressure only. What exactly is creating pressure on water in deep bore well, it is not, oxygen, nitrogen or dust particles, but it is energy only. Charging of energy rays is causing heat and creating pressure on surface of sea water and to evaporate or sea water cannot evaporate by itself. Three cycles of the water is possible means it is due to energy pressure only. First of all we have to acknowledge that there is energy base on this earth and it is helping in:
01 Normal functioning of nature.
02 Water taking three cycles.
03 It is not allowing temparature to fall extra-ordinarily during night time.
04 It is also aiding some of the key functions such as:
a) fire
b) light
c) explosions
d) and others
Small amount of energy coming from sun after escaping hydrosphere is giving lot of light and heat means it is due to energy base only. Hydrosphere existing against our planet never allows energy to escape into space that much easily and at the same time it never allows excess energy to pass on to the planet. It is indeed providing us a comfortable, dry, wet climate suitable for the existence of nature. Energy coming from earth is acting as support to this base.
For that how the barometer is working and how time dilation is proved to be correct. It is due to energy pressure,
barometer is raising and it is due to gravitational waves i.e., energy rays present on the earth that time dilation and gravitational red shift is proved to be correct.
Yours
Psreddy.
The following users thanked this post: Alex Dullius Siqueira