The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Compton Scattering .... Seriously?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Compton Scattering .... Seriously?

  • 26 Replies
  • 9398 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 5nutjob (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 43
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Compton Scattering .... Seriously?
« Reply #20 on: 22/11/2010 21:55:26 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 22/11/2010 21:34:25
Learn to read;
I have already said this twice "the interaction of QM and relativity is a lot more complicated than the article makes it seem."

BTW, that's another false dichotomy. They may move without being in orbit.

So, explain. All you've spouted thus far is;- "it's a lot more complicated" without any actual clarification. [:I]

..... or, will you just continue to feed me links to stuff you've clearly not got a clue about? [:I]
« Last Edit: 22/11/2010 22:05:49 by 5nutjob »
Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 11235
  • Activity:
    95.5%
  • Thanked: 177 times
    • View Profile
Compton Scattering .... Seriously?
« Reply #21 on: 23/11/2010 06:51:37 »
" So, explain. All you've spouted thus far is;- "it's a lot more complicated" without any actual clarification.

..... or, will you just continue to feed me links to stuff you've clearly not got a clue about?"
Another false dichotomy.
There is a 3rd option where I don't bother to do either because I don't think you want to learn.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 13381
  • Activity:
    8.5%
  • Thanked: 27 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Compton Scattering .... Seriously?
« Reply #22 on: 02/12/2010 14:39:30 »
Ahh, a lively debate :)

Like that.
As for why an electron behaves as it does?
"We seek him here, we seek him there?"

I'm sure its about, somewhere?
Logged
"BOMB DISPOSAL EXPERT. If you see me running, try to keep up."
 

Offline peppercorn

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1466
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
    • solar
Compton Scattering .... Seriously?
« Reply #23 on: 02/12/2010 16:24:24 »
Quote from: yor_on on 02/12/2010 14:39:30
Ahh, a lively debate :)

Ten days & counting without debate, hmmmm...
Maybe not so lively afterall (& not such a bad thing either!) [;)]
Logged
Quasi-critical-thinker
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 13381
  • Activity:
    8.5%
  • Thanked: 27 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Compton Scattering .... Seriously?
« Reply #24 on: 02/12/2010 19:22:50 »
Ah, you might be right :)

As for my contributions it's been months though.
Makes it sort of relative :)

Physics, an answer for every question ::))
Logged
"BOMB DISPOSAL EXPERT. If you see me running, try to keep up."
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 11235
  • Activity:
    95.5%
  • Thanked: 177 times
    • View Profile
Compton Scattering .... Seriously?
« Reply #25 on: 02/12/2010 21:41:52 »
Incidentally, it's only a debate if each side listens to the other's points and answers them.
As far as I can tell, that stopped with the 3rd post.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Geezer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8314
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 6 times
  • "Vive la résistance!"
    • View Profile
Compton Scattering .... Seriously?
« Reply #26 on: 02/12/2010 22:34:33 »
I'm sure Nutjob will be back for additional beating as soon as he gets out of the ICU (intensive care unit).
Logged
There ain'ta no sanity clause, and there ain'ta no centrifugal force æther.
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.174 seconds with 47 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.