1

New Theories / Re: What exactly is gravity?

« on: 25/05/2021 14:59:29 »

false-equivalence-race-hounds.png (54.27 kB . 300x300 - viewed 3863 times)


P.S. - In terms of Favouritism, 1 & 2 are Equal...
But that Does Not mean they are absolutely the Same.
✌️
(Equivalence)

What ever it may, thanks for comparing with Great man.  I am after all a drop of water. 

2

New Theories / Re: What exactly is gravity?

« on: 23/05/2021 18:37:58 »

There is no strong nuclear force or weak gravity force, there is only one force.

How can that be the case when they behave so differently?

What ever you are saying is truth.  But I am talking about future.  In my view, not only Gravity, several other theories will be re-written in future.  It may take lot of time, still I am fully confident that it will be proved that only "one force" exists.

3

New Theories / Re: What exactly is gravity?

« on: 03/05/2021 15:40:02 »

***

See, I am not a researcher, postgraduate, for that not even science graduate.  There is no need for me to hide anything, I am a commerce graduate.  I am proud to announce that I am a science enthusiast.

You are not really a science enthusiast.  Someone who is interested in science would learn science.  You like to make up things based on a lack of knowledge.  If you were really a science enthusiast you would ask questions here to increase your knowledge of science instead of making incorrect conjectures.  I think you are a pseudoscience enthusiast.

I don't know whether it is by yourself or somebody else. 

Ok, "Do good and avoid Evil".

If the owners of the "naked scientists forum" opines that mine ideas are improper then I am ready to quit.  For next 15 days I am not going to login, by that time any one of them including moderators can give their opinion.

Right, goodbye
Yours
Psreddy

4

New Theories / Re: What exactly is gravity?

« on: 22/08/2020 16:47:23 »

I mean, if not clear:
 "WHAT would be the mathematical/geometrical "possibilities" if universal expansion was to reach the impossible edge of the universe, would it be forced to bend itself by splitting and multiplying volume, rules, wherever, so to "turn around"and reach infinity again?

Einstein has taken us to a different world.  It is true, it is a big topic, expansion or contraction of universe.  In my view, first we must be in a position to say, what exactly is gravity on Earth.  Further, we must have a perfect idea on functioning of our solar system.  But, here, un-certainity prevails and for all practical purposes we are taking Newtons inverse square law, which, we know, is incorrect.

5

New Theories / Re: What exactly is gravity?

« on: 08/08/2020 16:16:14 »

any chances that what we "see" as light speed, or speed of light to be no "speed" at all?
 What if by geometry, photon could be, avoiding time influence, and the traveling thing is the particle photon taking a ride on a geometrical wave of probability?

 Could be that space is at C while light is just taking a ride along with it?

 Or there's anything that undoubtedly, states: Light speed is a speed because...?

It is true that we are taking speed of light as constant.  We also know that Gravity slows down movement of light and bends light.  So, speed of light is different from gravity to non-gravity field.  But it is surprise to me:
01  It is true that there is gravity inside the closed elevator.
02  If the light beam is released from a hole on one side of the elevator certainly it moves out through the other hole.
03  If the elevator accelerates forward, it is the frame that is being lifted, in other words, in turn it lifts the gravity field inside the elevator.
04  Gravity at the bottom becomes dense or stronger. 
05  While coming down, gravity drags light beam.  Light beam also accelerates downward. 
06  When the light source is constant, what makes the light beam to change its position.
07  If the light is independent, nothing can stop it moving straight.
08  If there is a change or bend, while moving in a gravity field, certainly we can say that gravity bends light.
09  But light is changing its path according to gravity.
Yours
Psreddy   

6

New Theories / Re: What exactly is gravity?

« on: 02/08/2020 16:04:39 »

What I mean if there is an inside and or outside something, and that truth is unrelated with gravity.
 Gravity could be derivative from geometrical shapes, as if matter tied together "offers" a "minimal" margin, volume for "medium", only that on this case, medium would be the effect caused due density...

It is true that equivalence principle is the base for "what exactly is gravity".  But without having sufficient or correct idea on 'what exactly is gravity', it is like constructing a beautiful house without base. 

Mr Alex, tell me, can this geometry gives us a perfect idea on gravity.  Ok,  famous notation, "matter tells space time how to curve and curved space time tells matter how move".    How matter tells space time to curve.  What is being curved.  How this curved space time influences matter in turn. 

It is true that it is a change from Newton's inverse square law.  We are discussing, black holes in depth.  Further it is a big topic, measuring event horizon, can light escapes, and what happens if you dives into a black hole.  We also discuss about expansion or contraction of universe in a big way.

But, in exact terms, we don't know, "what exactly is giving you weight" on this Earth.

When it is nor clear, we follow, Newton's inverse square law.

   

7

New Theories / Re: What exactly is gravity?

« on: 01/08/2020 14:27:13 »

you're suggesting that the medium reads dense matter(earth) as a "hole" on it's fabric, and thus constantly trying to fill it... Electromagnetic forces/atomic forces, fight back, or more likely, use this medium attempt to their own benefit, not being able to collapse, they start to spin, not from themselves as their properties are, but their motion a physical representation of this medium?
 Something like that?

Ok, we will discuss about medium at a later date.  Basically it is equivalence principle, which is base for general relativity and Gravity to be decided first.

"An elevator that accelerates upwards at 9.8 m/s2 will see everything within it be accelerated downward towards the floor at that same rate: 9.8 m/s2. When you're in a vehicle that rapidly accelerates (and you feel yourself pushed back into your seat) or decelerates (that thrusts you forward), you're experiencing similar effects to what someone inside the accelerating elevator will feel".

It is true that it is the elevator accelerating forward.  But what is accelerating downwards.  Simply saying that it is due to  Newton's second law, F=ma is incorrect.  When the elevator accelerates forward, something is accelerating downwards, pushing you in opposite direction. 

01  It is true that there is Gravity inside the elevator and Mr.'X's weight is 75 kgs.
02  There is every need to understand that we are moving frame only.  For better understanding, take the example that you are in a car.  You are moving the frame of the car and in turn frame drags the contents there in including yourselves.
03  When the car is at rest or stationary, gravity or medium causing gravity is spread uniformly.
04  As the car accelerates forward, the medium, giving you weight continues to be at rest only.
05  As the car moves forward, things within the car faces additional medium, and thus boosting of gravity at the edges.
06  Additional gravity at the edges, pushes you backward.
07  One's the car attains  velocity, things comes to normal.

Yours
Psreddy

8

New Theories / Re: What exactly is gravity?

« on: 25/07/2020 15:52:53 »

well, right or wrong, since we do not completely understand gravity, the only thing that is left to say:
 The structure of his text was pretty easy to visualize...
 Since we are all emotive beings despise the effort, if we accept that we don't know to state we are right about the "not knowing", even that could, and most certainly is wrong... Still, easy to mind picture that scenario that he described.

Mr Alex,
As rightly accepted by Newton, there is a medium, giving or causing weight on Earth, known as Gravity.  It is true that Einstein carried out number of experiments to find out "What exactly this medium is".  But, in my opinion, whenever I go by his theory or thought experiments, i feel that it is incomplete and an unfinished agenda. 

I am just trying to find out the truth, exploring the different possibilities.  I am moving with confidence, but i am not sure, whether i could present it in better way or convince others  "what exactly is gravity".

Thank you
Psreddy

9

New Theories / What exactly is gravity?

« on: 23/06/2019 17:49:31 »

HOW GRAVITY WORKS:
Closed volumes with mass:  All closed volumes such as elementary particles Proton(s), neutron(s) and electron(s) pushes their surroundings and produces convex curvature of spacetime.   Their internal spacetime "pushes" the surrounding spacetime to make room. The density of spacetime around the closed volume increases, and the latter has difficulty to move. As a result, a "mass effect" appears, i.e. an effect having all the characteristics of mass. Since spacetime has properties of elasticity, as per Einstein it exerts a pressure on the surface of closed volumes. The mass component [M] can be extracted from the pressure [M/LT2] by simple mathematical operations. This leads to a 4D expression of the mass: m = f(x,y,z,t)

Open Volumes, massless: It is just a vacuum, but sometimes found in various forms such as the volume of orbitals or the space between atoms. These volumes exist but they are "porous" regarding spacetime. More exactly, they are subject to variations of spacetime but they do not curve spacetime themselves. Therefore, open volumes are massless since no curvature means no mass

If we replace the closed volume by two or more closed volumes, the pressure exerted by spacetime on these volumes tends to bring them closer to each other. The result is equivalent to an attraction. For example, a pressure on one side of a sheet of paper is equivalent to an attraction on the other side. In both cases, the sheet is curved.
Gravitation is not an attractive force between masses, but a pressure force exerted by spacetime on closed volumes that tends to bring them closer to each other.


How Gravity works:
It is true that all elementary particles pushes their surroundings and produces convex curvature.  If we replace two or more closed volumes, pressure against them increases and the same was experimentally proved.

First of all, we have to remember that this experiment was done in a Gravity field only.  Gravity is already influencing each and every particle and Gravity is of “matter blind”.  We are testing Gravity effect on closed volume in a Gravity field.

Suppose if a closed volume has to “curve the spacetime” means its internal energy must come out.  So each and every closed volume must be exited with energy to do so.  Isn’t it appears something extra-ordinary and unbelievable.   
 Here, we are looking at one side of the coin only.  There is potential energy stored on this Earth.  It is creating pressure/force on all closed volumes.  Excess energy, emitted by the closed volume comes out and pushes the outside energy, which appears as curvature.   “THIS IS THE CURVATURE”.

However it is true that energy is of object oriented.  Since all masses are its objects it start collecting/pooling against it and creates pressure which is known as “mass effect”.  It mainly depends on the availability of energy in the open area.

“Gravity is not an attractive force between masses but pressure force exerted by spacetime”. 

Unless there is pooling/concentration of energy against mass gravity is impossible.  Water particles are raising due to radiation and these particles moves so high that it curves the space.  When these particles joins with other particles, due to gravity or geodesics, becomes heavier and creates pressure on the energy and “mass effect” comes out.

Gravity as Curved Spacetime
Einstein eventually identified the property of spacetime which is responsible for gravity as its curvature. Space and time in Einstein's universe are no longer flat (as implicitly assumed by Newton) but can pushed and pulled, stretched and warped by matter. Gravity feels strongest where spacetime is most curved, and it vanishes where spacetime is flat. This is the core of Einstein's theory of general relativity, which is often summed up in words as follows: "matter tells spacetime how to curve, and curved spacetime tells matter how to move". A standard way to illustrate this idea is to place a bowling ball (representing a massive object such as the sun) onto a stretched rubber sheet (representing spacetime). If a marble is placed onto the rubber sheet, it will roll toward the bowling ball, and may even be put into "orbit" around the bowling ball. This occurs, not because the smaller mass is "attracted" by a force emanating from the larger one, but because it is traveling along a surface which has been deformed by the presence of the larger mass. In the same way gravitation in Einstein's theory arises not as a force propagating through spacetime, but rather as a feature of spacetime itself. According to Einstein, your weight on earth is due to the fact that your body is traveling through warped spacetime!

As we have seen, matter does not simply pull on other matter across empty space, as Newton had imagined. Rather matter distorts space-time and it is this distorted space-time that in turn affects other matter. Objects (including planets, like the Earth, for instance) fly freely under their own inertia through warped space-time, following curved paths because this is the shortest possible path (or geodesic) in warped space-time.
This, in a nutshell, then, is the General Theory of Relativity, and its central premise is that the curvature of space-time is directly determined by the distribution of matter and energy contained within it. What complicates things, however, is that the distribution of matter and energy is in turn governed by the curvature of space, leading to a feedback loop and a lot of very complex mathematics. Thus, the presence of mass/energy determines the geometry of space, and the geometry of space determines the motion of mass/energy.

About General theory of relativity:
: "matter tells spacetime how to curve, and curved spacetime tells matter how to move". This is the central premise of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.  Actually curvature of spacetime by the closed volume is the base for this.  When a small particle curves the space what about huge masses such as Earth.   “According to Einstein, your weight on earth is due to the fact that your body is traveling through warped spacetime” .

Earth is not rotating against gravity but gravity itself hooked Earth.  Here Earth is moving means it is not Earth alone, things existing on the Earth, gravity field everything in one unit.  Spacetime is warped not due to spinning of Earth.  There is strong potential energy on this Earth and it is due to mass effect, warping things on the Earth. Here comparison to cylindrical carnival ride to Earth is not so correct.  Cylindrical carnival is moving in a gravity field.  As the carnival moves, at the edges gravity weakens and climate warps the edges.

As per Newton,  "it follows that a moving body has no determinate velocity and no definite line in which it moves". 
In fact curvature is only against the mass and there are no curved paths. Imagine empty space - in our case, a two-dimensional plane - with no forces acting between the bodies floating around. If there are no forces, then classical mechanics and Einstein's mechanics of special relativity are in agreement: Under these circumstances, bodies move along the straightest possible lines.

In flat, empty space-time, small test panrticles follow straight lines.

Ok, let us imagine that there is 2d space or empty space. Suppose small test particles A and B have started their journey in empty space.  As there is no Gravity or curved space nothing can stop them.  Let us analyse in detail.  Suppose if we detonate an atom bomb, energy is freed.  Nothing can stop movement of energy.  There is no scope for chain reaction. Each atom detonated, electrons, protons, neutrons comes out freely and makes their way.  Here there is no scope for E=MC2.

Here, in 2d space or empty space, light is impossible.  If switch an torch light, it never gives you any light. Potential energy stored within cell comes out, but, since it is empty, light particles moves out freely.

2d Space or empty space exists in between two solar systems only.

Suppose if we enter our solar system, 4d space time, energy and dust particles are present everywhere.  Here matter curves space time.  Here energy is in free  state and effects of gravity are absent. Ok, if we detonate an atom bomb, since there is curvature of space, it explodes, however in a slow motion and that too, as there is no pressure or force, chain reaction slows down, area coverage is limited and of course, sudden eddies into the space time is limited and it covers short radius only.  Here particle A and B cannot move freely as other particles obstruct them.

If we switch on a torch cell, it gives light but within short radius.  Light behaves differently as there is no gravity.  Light is not bent by gravity and therefore we have to arrange them near to us.

Einstein’s 4d spacetime:
This is present near to the huge masses such as Earth. A given configuration of matter distorts space-time geometry (not only because of mass, but also with its energy, inner tensions or pressure) and this distorted geometry makes matter move in certain ways. This movement, in turn, changes the matter configuration, and space-time geometry changes correspondingly. Now that space-time geometry is a bit different, it also acts on matter in a different way, matter moves, geometry changes, and so on in an endless dance.

Raise of particles:
This is the key point in creating Gravity in a 4d space time.  Our predecessors are having a wrong notion that spin of Earth is paving way for this.  We have to keep in mind that Earth is not rotating against gravity, but gravity itself hooked Earth. 

Each and every closed volume is undergoing the influence of Gravity, so naturally it comes down to Earth only.  But how particle A and B are raising.  If we observe nature carefully, it is water particles.  Due to radiation water particles are raising and are moving against Gravity.  It is paving way for storage of potential energy on this Earth. If the energy start pooling or concentrating at a particular place, water evaporates and start moving into the space.  If the pressure or force increases water particles and other dust particles moves to new height and it appears that space time is curved.  Meanwhile it is paving way for further accumulation of potential energy. Particles raising from Earth at different places joins with each other and becomes heavier and accelerates downwards.  In this way it warps space time of Earth, which is known as Gravity.

E = mc2 Enigma
 E = mc2 is a part of Special Relativity. However, despite the fact that the calculus is quite simple, Modern Physics does not propose a rational explanation of this strange phenomenon.
The Spacetime Model demonstrates that the principle of converting mass to energy is very simple. This principle is shown by the following example.
•   Part A
An empty sphere is immerged in a container filled with water. The surface of water is quiet.
•   Part B
If the sphere disappears suddenly by a thought experiment, the depression will make eddies which have energy (E = hν). Converting a mass to energy follows the same principle. A closed volume disappears, and is transformed into an open volume. This produces "eddies" in spacetime, which are gamma rays. These gamma rays may be converted into particles such as electrons-positrons pairs, and so on.


About E = mc2
There is Gravity and it is influencing each and every closed volume. Raising of particles have helped in creating potential energy stored on Earth.  Due to pressure/force exerted by this potential energy, each and every closed volume is curving the space time.

 If we say that closed volumes are curving space time by its internal energy, it is rather irrelevant.  If we detonate an atom, energy already present in the space time, potential energy, which created  “inward thrust” and it tries to occupy the gap.  Now energy freed from the atom, creates “outward thrust”.  This action increases radiation within short distance and paves way for chain reaction. Total process is completed within short time.  Initially an “inward thrust” is created and later “outward thrust”   creates eddies in the space time.

Total energy released by an atom bomb mainly depends on:
01  Internal energy
02  Gravity in a particular  place.
Suppose if we detonate the same atom bomb on Moon:
01  Internal energy is same.
02  Gravity is just 1/6th only

Since gravity is weak, curvature of space time by the closed volume is also weak. “eddies” into space time slows down and it spreads up to limited area only.

Suppose if the same atomic bomb is detonated in space, outside Earth’s climate: Here there is sufficient energy but it is not present with any force i.e., free state and thus even though there is inward as well outward thrust explosion is limited. 

How Solar system is working:
Big bang is the base for any solar system.  When two huge masses faced each other devastating fire started.  It resulted in release of huge energy into open area.    It is not only Sun but other planets also burnt for lot of period and pumped huge energy.  At present Sun is only maintaining this energy base.  It is true that energy is of ‘object oriented’. 

This energy base is present in the form of rings, like onion rings.  We can compare this to rainbow.  Since our Solar system is moving to unknown place, energy is moving along these rings. 

Ok, suppose an asteroid from 2d space or empty entered our solar system.   Energy curves the space time around the asteroid.  It all depends on the acceleration or speed with which the asteroid is travelling.  Suppose if the mass of the asteroid consists of light atoms than it yields to the energy and start moving along with other planets.

In case, if the asteroid crosses 1st one and enters next one, the 2nd one possess more energy than the 1st one.  So naturally curvature around the asteroid increases and creates more pressure.  If it yields than naturally it remains within that circle.

Moon is also one such asteroid only.  When it entered after crossing mostly 6 lanes, curvature increased and it simply yielded.  Moon is having its own Gravity field, so it started spinning against its axis.  Any asteroid that enters, initially yields to energy pressure and lose weight and will be thrown to inertial position. 

When Moon entered gravity field of Earth, both tug on each other, in fact both are in inertial position.  Energy within the lane is moving, it created pressure/force on the curvature and both started rotating against each other and also moved along the lane.  In case for any reason if the moon crosses this lane, it becomes independent planet, unless other planet influences it. 

In this universe each solar system is independent unit.

Rotation and revolution of planet:
Suppose we have sent a rocket into space.  There is potential energy stored in the space.  It start concentrating against rocket and curves the spacetime around the rocket and  throws it into inertial position.  Now rocket is in free state.   There is curvature of spacetime but there is no Gravity.  This curvature now start interacting with Gravity from Earth and Sun.  Strong energy waves coming from Sun pushes it and it start rotating against Earth Gravity waves.
In the case of planets it is different and there is Gravity.  Gravity waves will be moving out to far reaching places.  Energy rays coming from Sun interacts with these Gravity waves of planet, bents and enters planets atmosphere.  Meanwhile a movementum is gained and it starts rotating against its axis. 

Yours
Psreddy

10

New Theories / Re: What is global warming?

« on: 26/01/2019 14:09:13 »

Friends
Please come out from this and let us go for a worthy discussion.

Thank you
Yours
Psreddy

11

New Theories / Re: What exactly gravity is?

« on: 24/09/2016 15:19:16 »

Friends, Let us share what exactly Dark energy is...

The dark energy is that it is simply the "cost of having space" that is, a volume of space has some intrinsic, fundamental energy.  Since energy and mass are related by E = mc2, Einstein's theory of general relativity predicts that this energy will have a gravitational effect. It is presumed that dark energy would need to have a strong negative pressure like radiation pressure in a metamaterial to explain the observed acceleration of the expansion of the universe. According to general relativity, the pressure within a substance contributes to its gravitational attraction for other things just as its mass density does. This happens because the physical quantity that causes matter to generate gravitational effects is the stress–energy tensor, which contains both the energy (or matter) density of a substance and its pressure and viscosity.

Well, it is predicted that dark energy is causing expansion of universe and it is giving strong negative pressure. It is sometimes called a vacuum energy because it is the energy density of empty vacuum. In fact, most theories of particle physics predict vacuum fluctuations that would give the vacuum this sort of energy.

Dark energy is the strong negative pressure and it is presumed to be causing the expansion of universe.  It is true that if we create vacuum, it exerts lot of stress/force.  But how it is gaining stress/force is to be studied carefully.  In the example previously discussed by us: Take water in a bucket, and close it by an empty bucket and now create vacuum.  As you create vacuum, water start raising and in this way we are presuming that vacuum is accelerating the expansion of universe.

But, how far and to what extent it correct. 
01  When you create vacuum, energy, which is of object oriented moves out along with masses. 
02  It is true that there is huge amount of energy is present on this earth and it is exerting lot of   
     pressure/force on all  objects.  For this energy, water is also one of the objects only.
03  When energy moves out, pressure/force on water is lost and it start raising.
04  HERE KEY AND BASIC POINT IS:
    a) Vacuum is gaining force/pressure is due to the outside energy pressure only.
    b) Suppose if we create vacuum in space, where there is no pressure/force of energy, its effect is little or
        nothing.
    c) Vacuum is the difference of high pressure area to low pressure area. 
    d) Actually vacuum carry's no pressure/force at all.

Let us assume that we are trying to cook food using a pressure cooker.  Here, pressure cooker start working only when it is taken to high pressure area.  It is true that we are all living in high gravitational force, but its effect is common on all objects, including things to be cooked.  So to cook food, we have to place the cooker in high pressure area created due to the flames. 

Actually Dark energy carry's no weight and it has no capacity to create pressure/force on the expansion of the universe and on the gravity.  It is true that energy moves from high area to low area, and due to this reason universe may be expanding.

Yours
Psreddy

12

New Theories / Re: What exactly gravity is?

« on: 13/09/2016 07:58:23 »

Mr. Thebox,

Well, Newton's law of universal gravitation states that a particle attracts every other particle in the universe using a force that is directly proportional to the product of their masses but also inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. Well, keeping this in mind Newton thought that the Earth is a huge mass and therefore it is attracting each and everything towards it and he named this attraction as 'gravity'. 

Whereas Einstien thought that the attraction in between two masses is least one and therefore he has taken mass and energy as responsible for gravity. Einstein was so genius that he carried out number of tests and came to a conclusion that it is the acceleration in energy which is causing gravity.  However he could not found the source of energy. In fact to cause/create acceleration, addition of fresh energy is must.   So, naturally he  thought that the invisible rays released by neutron stars are responsible for gravity. In his general relativity,  he has taken us to a different world and mesmarized the scientific world.


In General relativity, removing energy is removing mass, and for an observer in the center of mass frame, the formula m = E/c2 indicates how much mass is lost when energy is removed. In a nuclear reaction, the mass of the atoms that come out is less than the mass of the atoms that go in, and the difference in mass shows up as heat and light with the same relativistic mass as the difference. In this case, the E in the formula is the energy released and removed, and the mass m is how much the mass decreases. In the same way, when any sort of energy is added to an isolated system, the increase in the mass is equal to the added energy divided by c2.

There are two distinct cases of mass, the gravitational mass and the inertial mass. The gravitational mass is the quantity that determines the strength of the gravitational field generated by an object, as well as the gravitational force acting on the object when it is immersed in a gravitational field produced by other bodies. The inertial mass, on the other hand, quantifies how much an object accelerates if a given force is applied to it. The mass–energy equivalence in special relativity refers to the inertial mass. However, already in the context of Newton gravity, the Weak Equivalence Principle is postulated: the gravitational and the inertial mass of every object are the same. Thus, the mass–energy equivalence, combined with the Weak Equivalence Principle, results in the prediction that all forms of energy contribute to the gravitational field generated by an object. This observation is one of the pillars of the general theory of relativity.

Existence of Energy:
It is true that when an atom is split energy is freed and comes out freely.  Light particles of atom start moving out into the open area.  It is true that similar mass attracts each other and therefore these particles joins together and with the help of others turns out into a full pledged atom once again.  Here in this process certain amount of energy is gets packed within the atom and in my view this small quantity of energy may be termed as "quantum energy".  When energy is freed into open area, open area is not empty and there is huge amount of energy and the freed electrons joins the existing rays and a movementum is created.

Here most of our research/concentration is on the amount of energy emitted by an atom only.

Grouping/concentration:
Energy is having one of the important quality of grouping/concentration.  Suppose if you light a match stick, energy freed from the mass start concentrating around the match stick, this in turn leads to further addition of heat and light.  This is the base for fire.  Suppose if the energy is not having this quality of grouping/concentration, then what ever energy that is freed moves out freely and there is no fire or explosion.  In the example, referred by me previously, firewood was used for cooking in the evening, however energy released through burning of wood, with the help of existing energy in the open area developed energy base and this energy base with the help of small energy coming from charcoal, survived for longer period. 

When two huge masses, faced each other, devastating fire started against all the small pieces, also known as planets.  Energy freed, due to burning started spreading to wide area.  When the fire stopped, spreading to further area is also stopped.  In my view, even sun is not burning, it is in the stage of burning charcoal only and small amount of energy released by it is supporting existing Energy base.

Similar thing is happening on the earth also.  But due to strong hydrosphere, this energy base is further strengthened.  This energy, due to the pressure/force of hydrosphere, in turn accelerating on objects and this is "Gravity". 

In my view, attraction in between two masses, may be known as "Gravity" and this force/pressure of energy is a different one.

Yours
Psreddy   

13

New Theories / Re: What exactly gravity is?

« on: 11/09/2016 12:47:08 »

Well, it is not requesting your help, but expressing happiness over sharing of mine ideas with the world. At the early
school days, I am not a bright student,  but i use to counter the lessons.  For example, when the teacher start explaining electromagnetism, i use to rewrite them, saying if the electricity start developing into magnetic waves than how and where the electricity is flowing.  Later these type of ideas and some of the incidents that have happened in the early days, paved the way for writing these theories. 


Let us see the principle, E=MC2:

where E is the energy of a physical system, m is the mass of the system, and c is the speed of light in a vacuum. In words, energy equals mass multiplied by the speed of light squared. Because the speed of light is a very large number in everyday units, the formula implies that any small amount of matter contains a very large amount of energy.

01  Where this energy is stored.
02  If it is in the small atoms, than how it is stable.
03  It is also true that as long as the energy is remained within the atoms, it is not multiplied.
04  It is only after coming out from the atom that it is multiplying.

Here we have to remember one key point that as long as the energy remains within atom, it is not multiplied and it is only when ignited and after coming out into open area that it is multiplying.  So, there is no mass and energy relationship.

01  It is multiplying only after coming out from the mass.
02  Here, It is the energy in the open area that plays key role.
03  So, it is energy to energy relationship only.
04  So, we can take this formulae E = EC2.
05  This is the reasons why explosions vary from place to place.

SPEED OF LIGHT:
Light is nothing but charging of ray only.  At present we are of the opinion, if we switch on battery cell it gives light.
Actually, no fresh energy ray is created each time.   Few electrons released by battery cell is not having any capacity to create any fresh energy rays.  It against depends upon the energy in the open area and that is why it varies from place to place.  If the battery cell releases more electrons, the pressure/force on the existing energy ray increases and thus speed.  Suppose if the battery cell is weak, electrons released by it is also few only.  These weak electrons pushes energy ray slowly and thus light. This is the reason, why we get more sun light at the centre of the earth, where there is huge concentration of existing energy.   As we move towards north and south poles, where earth is not releasing so much energy and thus concentration of energy on the earth and there fore light is developed slowly.  Here light is so weak that if the support from sun is lost for any reason, light goes sharply.

Yes, as you said, lack of maths and formula have badly affected my theories. Actually all the theories written by newton or Einstein, have its base, taking previous ideas/theories and they have extended formula, maths.  But my theories are not having previous base/extension. I had started with huge amount of energy present on the earth and in the universe for which i can give logical/reasoning explanation only and  i cannot give any maths.  Hereby i request the scientific world, not to rely on the mathematical presentation alone for any judgement, but to give importance to new ideas and logical explanation.

We will discuss your point later.

Yours
Psreddy

14

New Theories / Re: What exactly gravity is?

« on: 04/09/2016 16:41:33 »

Here, i am sharing my ideas on working of gravity vehicles.  Well, after attempting some of the basic theories, they have in fact paved the way for writing this.  At present most of the vehicles working or designed is based on the three principles of newton.  There is huge energy on this earth and it is exerting influence against each and every object and  this is the Gravity.  It is true that energy is of object oriented and if objects are removed from any place, energy along with objects moves out and thus we can escape from gravity. 

01  Any vehicle working on this earth, broadly can be divided into two i.e., 01  Engine and 02 carrier. 
02  Engine pulls or pushes the carrier and the carrier consists of objects to be carried.
03  Both the Engine and carrier are working in the gravity field only.
04  It is impossible or no scope to run engine in anti gravitational field.
05  Only scope available is to vaccum the carrier only. 
06  Ok, let us presume that carrier is vacuumed and the weight of which was 1000 kgs, and just came down to 100 kgs.
07  Now Engine is working in the gravity field and the carrier is working in the anti gravity field.
08  When the engine starts pulling the carrier, which is just 100 kgs, on movement it further looses weight and start moving in all directions.

For this i would like to present an alternative way, which i am sure are ideas only and are not tested anywhere.

01  While designing the vehicle, we have remember one important point, how sun energy controls our earth.
02  For full control over earth, sun energy at any point of time must focus over more than 60% of the area.
03  I had also compared this to basket ball player.  To have perfect control over ball, the player has to keep his hands  more than 60% of the ball, or otherwise the ball will move in other direct.
04  Keeping this in mind, we have to design the vehicle.
05  In my view, vehicle is to be designed in a circle or rectangular shape and place may left for the carrier at the center.
06  Vehicle, including Engine, is raised from all sides and it must control the carrier more than or at least 75%.
07  Here only engine, along with vehicle moves and the carrier remains in tact.
07  By doing this, volatility caused by carrier is reduced to barest minimum.
08  When the carrier is vacuumed, it leads to heavy concentration of energy and there fore it is to be designed in twin model.  Inner part of the carrier is completely vacuumed.  One more layer is to be created against the carrier and it is to be partially vacuumed.

But, in my view, bowl shape or flying soccer design is the best and there fore, it is easy to develop them and to run.

Ok, we will continue this later.

Yours
psreddy

 

15

New Theories / Re: What exactly gravity is?

« on: 02/09/2016 15:46:30 »

Well, when i started comparing the incident that happened on that night to earth, suddenly mind stopped working.  It is true that hydrosphere carries weight and who is bearing that weight.  In case if it gets weakened for any reason, hydrosphere start occupying earth.  This is what happening in north and south poles, where earth started cooling right from the beginning. 

Here, the comparison is not for any other things but exactly to understand the quality of energy i.e., grouping/concentrating at a particular place.  Initially when it is released from mass, it start concentrating at any one place.  When the concentration is boosted, due to attraction between electrons, it start forming into energy rays.  This quality of energy helped in the formation of "Energy base". 

All the planets, including sun, in our universe are not in the stage of burning firewood, but are burning charcoal only.
All the planets have already shed lot of energy into open area. This freed energy developed into a energy base.  This base is permanent one.  It is true that Sun is blessed with more light materials, and there fore it is still burning and releasing lot of energy.

About Oxygen:
In my view fire is a different one and it has no relevance to oxygen.  Well, oxygen may burn, it does not mean or matter that it helps in burning of things. It is the first subject to be taken up by me, but faced lot of criticism.  It is true that it is very difficult to convince others in this present scenario.

Earth crust:
The crust of the Earth is composed of a great variety of igneous, metamorphic, and sedimentary rocks. The crust is underlain by the mantle. It is true that deep inside of the charcoal is still burning.  But this should be taken as a example only.  Mantle of the earth consists of hard rocks and these rocks takes lot of time before heating up.  But ones it gets heated and start burning it takes lot of time to cool down.  There is huge energy concentration at the centre of the earth.  It is true that energy moves from high area to low area and there fore there is continuous flow from the centre of the earth into open area. Rotation of the earth is speeding up this process of movement of energy. 

However, a simple test for the life of the mantle is amount of energy released by it.  What ever matter/material mantle may consists, it has to cool over a period of time and it cannot remain permanently.  As it cools further and further more area will come into the hands of hydrosphere.  This should not be taken for or compared to shorter period changes. 

Even in the case of sun also, there is no addition of matter, but it is the existing matter that is burning.  Upper layer of the charcoal is not cooled and it is still burning and it is in the red colour only.  There is strong energy base against the sun and it is moving into all directions continuously. 

Well, energy released by earth or coming from sun is simply maintaining this "Energy base".  In fact, at this juncture they have no capacity to create this Energy base.

We have already discussed about dark energy and the experiment relating to it also.  But coming to Black holes, these are rarest phenomina, which cannot taken for this gravity or expansion of universe.  Einstein in his general relativity, taken us to a different world and in fact mesmerized the scientific world, with his thoughts.  Some of the tests carried out by them on the earth, where there is huge concentration of energy, led to miscalculation of power of Dark energy and Black holes.  Black holes are developed due to temporary conditions prevailing at a particular
place and it will diminish over a period of time, and they have no capacity to influence the total universe.  In my view, our universe is having lot of capacity to absorb these changes.  What ever energy, neutron stars may release, but they are not having any capacity to influence total universe.  In my view Dark energy is not having that much capacity/power, as expected by us and it is simply working as a receptionist.  If any energy due to pressure enters it, it simply allows it to move without any obstruction.  In case if any matter enters it,
it allows the matter to move with maximum speed. 

Yours
Psreddy

16

New Theories / Re: What exactly gravity is?

« on: 31/07/2016 07:41:33 »

Mr Alex siqueira,

In my view, whatever thing it may, total credit for identifying gravity goes to Mr.Newton only.  Where as Mr.Einstein spent most of time on experiments to identify existence of gravity. 

01 Gravitational redshift
02 Gravitational time dilation.

Having formulated the relativistic, geometric version of the effects of gravity, the question of gravity's source remains. In Newtonian gravity, the source is mass. In special relativity, mass turns out to be part of a more general quantity called the energy–momentum tensor, which includes both energy and momentum densities as well as stress. Einstein was almost near to the point, however he was confused and he could not locate huge amount of energy already present on this earth.  He moved to curvature of space time and thought that it is raising gravitational radiation. 

But it is true that electromagnetic waves emitted by stars is too small to measure and its effect on objects, on planets is very limited.  In case if it is so means, suppose let us assume that  mass weight of an object is  10 kgs and its gravitational weight is 10 kgs than total weight of the mass is 20 kgs and when it is giving additional weight of 10 kgs on simple mass, what about its influence on the total universe. 

It is true that energy moves from high to low area and it is of course a simple phenomena.  In our universe sun is emitting lot of energy into universe.  Similarly binary stars also and whatever quantity of energy they may emit, energy moves from high pressure areas to low pressure and thus spreads to new areas and existence of space fabric is also in question.  Due to attraction in between electrons, they keep together in the form of rays and these rays carrys energy from one place to other place.  Initially energy start establishing base and due to pressure some of the rays moves to longer distances.

Dark energy is also another important area to be studied carefully.  Actually, due to attraction energy tries to exist in the form of base, and the other area where there is no energy is termed as vacuum or dark energy. In my view this is rarest thing.  Energy entering dark energy area, as there is no mass or energy, it simply moves out to other area where there is concentration of mass or energy base.  Chances of dark energy creating pressure on objects in a planet is remote.

Actually i had seen one of my friend carrying out a simple test, taking water in a bucket, closing outside, vacuuming and showing how water escalates.  Here we have to remember one important point that we are living on this earth where there is huge amount of energy which is influencing each and every thing.  This energy is creating lot of pressure on surface of the water and it is also penetrating deeply.  When you try to create vacuum, energy along with mass moves out, and pressure on water is lost and water tries to escalate and one more important point is that pressure inside water is high when compared to outside and therefore energy within water tries to occupy this gap.

Your point of view:
A molten iron and rock outercore would be able to "conserve heat much more efficient than a gas or some other elements, like sun the hello produces much more heat but will not be as good as magma when in terms of absorbing the acceleration...

Let us take two or three iron pieces and place them in open area.  First one of course absorbs lot of heat and passes a part of which to next one.  See, what ever matter it may, when energy moves from one matter to other, due to obstruction created by mass, it slows down and gets reduced.  Think, how much energy, matter can absorb and passes it to inner core.  Here comparison is in between iron and rock outer core to gas or other light elements. This is an exceptional/rare case and is to be studied as such and not to be taken as main item.

Your point of view:
Things seems to be lighter on the moon, cause the moon "where it stands" is not big enough, and or also does not have a appropriated outercore to generate electromagnetism enough to push back the outer expansion over it... The same case as mars, but mars once in a much earlier solar system probably had it's magnetosphere as we do, "

In my view it is not outer core or size that determine independent existence of any planet, but it is the amount of energy released by the planet and the climate that determines independent existence of planet.  Suppose if the moon is releasing lot of energy into open area, than strong energy rays will hit earth and distance will increase and moon will move away to far away distances.  Climate is also another important point that determine very existence of planet.  Suppose if any planet is not having strong climate that sun rays will hit directly and energy rays penetrate deeply and creates pressure on one side of the planet. whereas on the other side, as there is no climate, dark energy prevails and it has no capacity to maintain the planet in its original place and planet start moving away.  Climate is aslo key factor in the rotation and revolution of any planet. 

Since moon is already cooled to a great extent, it is not releasing strong energy rays into the space and it is also not having strong climate.  So it is mainly depending on the energy rays coming from earth.

Your point of view:
About different gravitational pull over an one planet, there is many influences, such as the stars and moons around you, but in case of earth do you want to blame someone for the different magnetic fields, blame the diversity of elements on the inner layers, and also blame the oceans and their depth, the liquid salt water is the one to blame for earth magnetosphere  holes..

yeah, we have so many options to blame.  If the choice is not right we will go for more options to blame for.  if the moon is moving away from us means, there may be so many reasons, earth may be releasing more energy and strong energy rays may be hitting moon.  The other option is moon to release more energy, which is almost ruled out.

Your point of view:
What I mean is "the apple, has never felt from the tree", it was pushed by the dark energy acceleration

Dark energy is unknown form of energy presumed to be exist througt the space.  It is also said to be causing expansion of universe.  Dark energy is thought to be very homogeneous, not very dense and is not known to interact through any of the fundamental forces other than gravity.  Expansion of the universe is common thing and i do not know, why and how this was linked to gravity. 

In my view, energy is the base for air movement, when energy start establishing base, water within that area evaporates, start moving, light molecules raises from the earth and start moving.  Here if water is to create gravity means total hydrosphere must come down to earth.  Energy is having an important quality of moving from high area to low and this is movement of air. 

We are now searching for gravity waves, and somebody says we have found them.  We are experiencing gravity on earth, but we are searching for gravity waves from stars.  we also link it to the outer expansion of universe and also link it to outer  surface of the planet and to inner expansion. We take exceptional/rare things and link them to gravity.

Ok, let us take a simple example which is causing force/pressure on objects on the earth.  We are all taking this as
atmosphere pressure and where as gravity is taken as attraction in between objects.  We are all using borewell motors to pump water and this is working with the help of atmosphere pressure only.  What exactly is creating pressure on water in deep bore well, it is not, oxygen, nitrogen or dust particles, but it is energy only.  Charging of energy rays is causing heat and creating pressure on surface of sea water and to evaporate or sea water cannot evaporate by itself. Three cycles of the water is possible means it is due to energy pressure only.  First of all we have to acknowledge that there is energy base on this earth and it is helping in:
01  Normal functioning of nature.
02  Water taking three cycles.
03  It is not allowing temparature to fall extra-ordinarily during night time.
04  It is also aiding some of the key functions such as:
    a)  fire
    b)  light
    c)  explosions
    d)  and others
Small amount of energy coming from sun after escaping hydrosphere is giving lot of light and heat means it is due to energy base only.  Hydrosphere existing against our planet never allows energy to escape into space that much easily and at the same time it never allows excess energy to pass on to the planet. It is indeed providing us a comfortable, dry, wet climate suitable for the existence of nature.  Energy coming from earth is acting as support to this base.

For that how the barometer is working and how time dilation is proved to be correct.  It is due to energy pressure,
barometer is raising and it is due to gravitational waves i.e., energy rays present on the earth that time dilation and gravitational red shift  is proved to be correct.

Yours
Psreddy.