1
New Theories / Re: Speculating: Is everything an universe of itself?
« on: 25/09/2020 14:01:17 »
I may have expressed it badly.
I'm wondering if we while using "the universe" as a boundary, even no being for our minds it acts as if it was.
If into doing so we are not blinding our perception, when considering, for example universal expansion.
That we may have be missing the whole scene.
For instance, a question:
What prevents the small inhabitants of the moon, to think that gravity of an invisible Earth is the expanding universe?
Wouldn't they be one and the same, sure the laws to be the same, but the perception may shift.
To the point that what they thought that was a forever endless field, was but the expansion bouncing over the Earth.
Earth relationship with the expansion here, acting on the role of "an interference" on its configuration, Earth being misread as (the impossible edge), ort better to say (one of multiple impossible edges), from the electron to the sun, all offerencig to space a different possible "impossibility", as if the expansion as reaching the Earth has as only possible answer to stay there stored, and or, to self update again and again, which would be the same as being stored with potential.
Guess I'm looking for alternative views where the expansion would have being gravity and both the same, only one existing, wondering if determining, multiple candidates to the expansion, rather the main one, inside out big bang, would not suffice...
If so, on this case, if instead of matter, could energy produce gravity to the extend to start to expand the whole within it?
The Universe is expanding forever, that based on out scale perception and the direction we decided to look from, could it be the case that every mass is an virtual end of The Universe? If one chooses it to be, based on an endless goal that never shifts, not depends, only is: Forever expanding towards forever, for I have never set a B point or cause to relate with?
I'm wondering if we while using "the universe" as a boundary, even no being for our minds it acts as if it was.
If into doing so we are not blinding our perception, when considering, for example universal expansion.
That we may have be missing the whole scene.
For instance, a question:
What prevents the small inhabitants of the moon, to think that gravity of an invisible Earth is the expanding universe?
Wouldn't they be one and the same, sure the laws to be the same, but the perception may shift.
To the point that what they thought that was a forever endless field, was but the expansion bouncing over the Earth.
Earth relationship with the expansion here, acting on the role of "an interference" on its configuration, Earth being misread as (the impossible edge), ort better to say (one of multiple impossible edges), from the electron to the sun, all offerencig to space a different possible "impossibility", as if the expansion as reaching the Earth has as only possible answer to stay there stored, and or, to self update again and again, which would be the same as being stored with potential.
Guess I'm looking for alternative views where the expansion would have being gravity and both the same, only one existing, wondering if determining, multiple candidates to the expansion, rather the main one, inside out big bang, would not suffice...
If so, on this case, if instead of matter, could energy produce gravity to the extend to start to expand the whole within it?
The Universe is expanding forever, that based on out scale perception and the direction we decided to look from, could it be the case that every mass is an virtual end of The Universe? If one chooses it to be, based on an endless goal that never shifts, not depends, only is: Forever expanding towards forever, for I have never set a B point or cause to relate with?