[MrIntelligentDesign (OP)]

There are four major mistakes or errors of Biological Evolution that could NO longer be defended by any fair and honest proponents of Evolution. These are the basis, the exclusivities, the methodologies and limited view of reality.

The worst is that Evolution had messed reality more. Proponents of ToE are thinking and boasting that they have tons and tons of evidences or tens of tens of thousands of proofs, but Evolution has none at all!

See the details!

Advertising removed

AFTER you read the details, let us discuss those four one at a time.

[alancalverd]

When did you last look in a mirror?

Did you look exactly like both of your parents?

If not, you have Evolved from them.

That's all it means. Not a theory, an observation.

[Alex Dullius Siqueira]

There are four major mistakes or errors of Biological Evolution that could NO longer be defended by any fair and honest proponents of Evolution. These are the basis, the exclusivities, the methodologies and limited view of reality.

The worst is that Evolution had messed reality more. Proponents of ToE are thinking and boasting that they have tons and tons of evidences or tens of tens of thousands of proofs, but Evolution has none at all!

See the details!

Advertising removed

AFTER you read the details, let us discuss those four one at a time.

 For me it lacks a primordial consciousness for life to occur.
  It it's a must in order to exist.
  Life can occur naturally as much as the universe could create a computer by chance in an accidental wherever.

 Still it would require a software, a system.

 Consious life "requires" instructions in order to be created.
 Even if that consious/instructions are binary, geometrical or mathematical, it doubles.
  A cell must recive environmental instructions in order to "have" instructions.

 Don't see other way out of this, at least not one which doesn't result into a lifeless shape which has the resemblance of a cell.

[Deecart]

Evolution is only a general concept.
Concerning the details it depend of the "thing" you are talking about.
Bacteries do not evolve like a shrimps, a flower or a human.
And this concept also apply to companies.

[Origin]

Consious life "requires" instructions in order to be created.

I agree but those 'instructions' are the natural laws of the universe.  Under the right conditions and with only the natural laws of physics and chemistry life can arise.  And evolution of that life can end up resulting people.

[alancalverd]

 Consious life "requires" instructions in order to be created.

Not true. The "instructions" are needed for cells to replicate, and once formed (by the laws of physics and chemistry) they can evolve into all sorts of interesting things and a few very dull ones that believe in magic.

[Deecart]

Life can occur naturally as much as the universe could create a computer by chance in an accidental wherever.

If there could only be 1 computer, the chance to get THE computer is very small, i agree.
But, there can be MANY computer, so the chance is much higher.
Furthermore, you can think that (one of) the first form of life (leading to the many other form of life and here we can observe convergent evolution : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convergent_evolution) is not due to random but is the normal evolution of the matter : Perhaps life do not appear by chance, but is the logical succession of the matter.

[Deecart]

Something else that should be taken in account :
I often hear about this "instruction" thing, like if the DNA would store instructions.
It is not.
A single "instruction" (so a triplet of nucleotids and it is why we talk about "code" and instruction) only code for one of the aminoacids (there can be 20, 21, or less of more depending of the era, we dont know  how many and how the firts aminoacids were coded).
But an amicoacid can be coded by more than 1 nucleotid triplet.
1 aminoacid do nothing !
It is not an instruction like in computer.
It is only one part of the more longer molecule called "protein" .

A protein can have some chemical activity, so the "instruction" if you want to tell it so, is at least the whole protein, so the whole ADN wich code for the protein (because of the degenerated code of the DNA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codon_degeneracy)
There are many possibilities to code for EXACTLY the same protein.
And there are many proteins that can have almost the same effect with or without some of their aminoacid (possibility to have many codes to produce the same function)