The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. General Science
  4. World's First RT Superconductor
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

World's First RT Superconductor

  • 6 Replies
  • 2606 Views
  • 2 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline vhfpmr (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 585
  • Activity:
    6%
  • Thanked: 53 times
    • View Profile
World's First RT Superconductor
« on: 27/07/2023 14:36:37 »
It seems the Koreans have just discovered the Holy Grail:
https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.12008
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2307/2307.12008.pdf
Logged
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 17713
  • Activity:
    68.5%
  • Thanked: 1436 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: World's First RT Superconductor
« Reply #1 on: 27/07/2023 14:55:38 »
The paper is sufficiently convincing to tempt me back into the world of MRI magnet design!
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 30167
  • Activity:
    21.5%
  • Thanked: 1172 times
    • View Profile
Re: World's First RT Superconductor
« Reply #2 on: 27/07/2023 17:09:42 »
I might postpone selling some dead lead-acid batteries to the scrap dealer.

What amuses me is that this material consists of elements that have been available for 350 years or so.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline paul cotter

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1197
  • Activity:
    35%
  • Thanked: 138 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: World's First RT Superconductor
« Reply #3 on: 27/07/2023 18:17:53 »
I hope this does not lead to garage tinkerers trying emulate such technology: as I am sure you know p4 is exceedingly dangerous with an ld50 of ~50mg. Obviously polymerised p such as red p is fairly innocuous but if heating is required I for one sure won't be near it.   Late correction: silly me, I should have read the paper before my premature comment, it is p as phosphate, totally safe. However with the lead content the eu might try to ban it, they have a severely misplaced fear of lead.
« Last Edit: 27/07/2023 20:10:23 by paul cotter »
Logged
Did I really say that?
 

Offline paul cotter

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1197
  • Activity:
    35%
  • Thanked: 138 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: World's First RT Superconductor
« Reply #4 on: 29/07/2023 10:32:27 »
I am surprised that a substance which is basically a doped lead phosphate even conducts at all. I know that βpbo2 is an excellent conductor in the massive state having used home made electrodeposited pbo2 in anodic oxidation( perchlorate ), but a phosphate salt? Mri scanners with superconducting magnets must require a lot of maintenance with their dual cryogenics and a room temperature superconductor would be a major boon: the only downside is that it may recall Alancalverd from retirement and this would be a great loss to the forum!
Logged
Did I really say that?
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 17713
  • Activity:
    68.5%
  • Thanked: 1436 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: World's First RT Superconductor
« Reply #5 on: 29/07/2023 11:54:33 »
Far from retired - this is the coffee room in my one-man office!

MRI maintenance actually involves very little to do with the cryogens. I used to own a couple of upright MRIs, one with a room-temperature electromagnet and one that used recirculating helium gas with a "high" temperature (about 30K) supercon. The major problem with open MRI systems is the use of an iron framed magnet to capture the return field: the magnetic properties of iron are very temperature-sensitive so most of the engineering effort (once we had built a large enough shielded room and foundations to support 150 tons of machinery, and found 400 kW from the cables under the street) went into air conditioning. They say that the most reliable machine in your house is the refrigerator motor, which should run continuously for 20 years with no maintenance, but as soon as you scale it up to shift 200 kW of heat, you're lucky if it runs for a month!

My clients are currently installing conventional helium-cooled magnets in all sorts of trailers and temporary buildings. The newest cryostats don't use intermediate nitrogen, have a very small helium capacity (it used to be cheaper than beer but is extremely expensive nowadays)  and only need topping up every couple of years. But it would still be nice to get rid of the stuff, if only because it is a dwindling and irreplaceable resource.

Maintenance engineers nowadays spend most of their time fixing increasingly complicated and unreliable data networks. The last time I recorded a site safety "fail" was because the $2M mobile unit was connected to the main hospital by a single Ethernet cable (note to our readers - yes, there is an aether, and you can buy it by the meter, with plugs already attached) running across the car park.
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline paul cotter

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1197
  • Activity:
    35%
  • Thanked: 138 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: World's First RT Superconductor
« Reply #6 on: 30/07/2023 18:35:38 »
There's a lot in that post that has aroused my interest. Me, personally, I would feel naked without at least a couple of mri machines in my possession, one in the kitchen, one in the bedroom and maybe one in a trailer that could accompany me in my travels. On a serious note I do have some questions. How the hell do you get helium down to 30k? What state is it in? ( I can't remember critical temps and pressure for helium -not sure if I ever knew ) You somewhat contradicted yourself when you said the relevant cryogenics were relatively trouble free yet the necessary compressor might only last a month, or did I misinterpret? I assume you are in the business of renting medical equipment-don't answer if this is considered too intrusive. Signed, your friendly pedanticist. PS I apologise for suggesting, without evidence, that you were retired. I had made the assumption since you always seem to have time to spar with BC, Hamdani and occasionally me, that you, like me, have too much time on your hands.
« Last Edit: 30/07/2023 18:44:06 by paul cotter »
Logged
Did I really say that?
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: superconductor  / room - temperature 
 

Similar topics (5)

Why do hot air ballons send dogs into a "the world is ending" barking fit?

Started by dentstudentBoard General Science

Replies: 6
Views: 16124
Last post 30/11/2020 15:40:24
by alancalverd
Are bees the health and safety, risk-assessment gurus of the insect world?

Started by thedocBoard Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution

Replies: 0
Views: 6954
Last post 15/02/2010 12:26:30
by thedoc
Would an unlimited supply of free energy solve the world food shortage?

Started by Joe L. OganBoard General Science

Replies: 2
Views: 6817
Last post 14/02/2010 13:22:03
by Karsten
If Humans Were Wiped Out Would The World Survive ? (A nuclear power question)

Started by neilepBoard General Science

Replies: 20
Views: 26887
Last post 12/01/2019 04:14:43
by Monox D. I-Fly
Is Final Theory of Everything generally accepted in the Scientific World today?

Started by Joe L. OganBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 18
Views: 13700
Last post 12/12/2009 18:00:00
by Geezer
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.275 seconds with 46 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.