1

New Theories / Re: Why light change its' speed and direction during refraction?

« on: Yesterday at 15:52:07 »

With a lot of online sources, it's hard to decide which explanation is considered mainstream at a given point in time. You can find them in the first videos in this thread.

Go to .edu sites, since those are generally university sites you can be reasonably sure the information there will be mainstream.

2

New Theories / Re: How does Noether's theorem apply to moments of time?

« on: 10/08/2022 23:50:49 »

Good job !
It is an illusion.

That could be the issue right there.  You may be defining the term 'illusion' in a nonstandard way.
Please define illusion.

Everytime you dont stick to the local phenomenon, you have to understand that "the local phenomenon" you are observing elsewhere is not the phenomenon itself.

How far away do you have to be from a phenomena to make it non-local?  Is there any mathematical equation that defines the distance at which something is non-local?

3

New Theories / Re: How does Noether's theorem apply to moments of time?

« on: 10/08/2022 23:20:13 »

I repeat : The reality is what happens localy.
Non local is what happens "around" (concerning space or time) where the phenomenon is occuring.
I am totaly convicted that real physic has to do with what happens at some point, at "the time" it occurs (time and space "position", so "the time" for some local observer).

This is terribly vague.
Let's assume someone is eating an omelet and I observe him through a telescope from 100 miles away.  Is what happens to him from his position 'reality' but what I observe from a distance an illusion?

4

New Theories / Re: How does Noether's theorem apply to moments of time?

« on: 10/08/2022 22:50:06 »

The non local phenomenon, i already answered ... not sure but i think 5 times.

Please define non local.  Are you saying you see illusion when you are observing another reference frame?
 

5

New Theories / Re: How does Noether's theorem apply to moments of time?

« on: 10/08/2022 22:41:35 »

So I guess you are not going to answer the question, "what part of relativity do you think is an illusion"?

6

New Theories / Re: How does Noether's theorem apply to moments of time?

« on: 10/08/2022 22:35:25 »

Mine's working quite fine.

Thats what every malfunctioning brain will say.

What is wrong with you?  Can't you just answer questions without being insulting?

7

New Theories / Re: How does Noether's theorem apply to moments of time?

« on: 10/08/2022 22:22:23 »

So what part of relativity is illusion?  I'm really curious what you think is illusion.

8

New Theories / Re: How does Noether's theorem apply to moments of time?

« on: 10/08/2022 22:15:17 »

Not sure you really understand anything (thats why i suppose you could be stupid).

Reported for insulting members.

9

New Theories / Re: How does Noether's theorem apply to moments of time?

« on: 10/08/2022 22:12:18 »

This is exactly what i say.
What happens localy is not an illusion :This is what we can call reality.
EVERYTHING that depends on this localy reality is at some point some illusion.

(Yes i am sorry , many of our experimentation of the world is illusion).

You're going to have to be much clearer than that.  You are starting to post word salad here. 

In the twin paradox both twins experience time locally at the normal rate but when they reunite the traveling twin is younger.  Doesn't sound like an illusion to me.

10

New Theories / Re: How does Noether's theorem apply to moments of time?

« on: 10/08/2022 21:26:08 »

Please be more specific.

What parts of relativity do you think are illusions?  Seems like an easy question.  Is time dilation an illusion?  Is length contraction an illusion? 

11

New Theories / Re: How does Noether's theorem apply to moments of time?

« on: 10/08/2022 18:32:55 »

If you cant disproof with some example (calling mommy is not an example) that SR is not based on illusions, then i must conclude that you do not  understand how SR work.

Please give an example of one of these illusions.

12

New Theories / Re: Is this New Logic Usefull?

« on: 10/08/2022 16:53:33 »

Ha ha. The Logic has been printed by IOSR Journal of Mathematics at: https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jm/papers/Vol18-issue4/Ser-3/D1804032041.pdf.

Now you would have to deal with it.

Paying somebody to publish your silliness on the internet for $75 bucks is meaningless.

IOSR Journals are listed as 'Predatory Journals'.  That means they don't actually peer review anything and just take your money to put your paper on the internet.

13

New Theories / Re: How does Noether's theorem apply to moments of time?

« on: 10/08/2022 12:08:14 »

Dont call mommy.
Why do you no want to use your own brain ?
You. What do you think about all that ?

No need to be a jerk.

What is wrong with the things i say ?

This.
"Saying this, the "now" we talk about in special realivity, is only "some illusion" (yes, an illusion has some real visual effect onto the far away observer)  of what happens localy"

14

New Theories / Re: How does Noether's theorem apply to moments of time?

« on: 09/08/2022 23:02:03 »

Are you what whe could name a sophist ?
"I am great because i am great. kneel before the king !!"
Lol.

No nothing like that.  I am saying I agree with the scientific community.  You on the other hand have something you made up on your own, that does not agree with observation.

15

New Theories / Re: How does Noether's theorem apply to moments of time?

« on: 09/08/2022 18:00:03 »

It is still an illusion.
i dont understand why you (and many others) cant agree with this obvious thing.

First of all, it is important to note that "and many others" is actually all of the scientific community.
The reason we can't agree it is an illusion is because it isn't an illusion.

Why is it an "illusion" ?
I repeat : Because the full phenomenon is not available at distant observers.

Please explain what you mean by this statement.

So the mathematical proof can not be a physical proof.

What do you mean by this, AFAIK the mathematical explanation matches the physical observations

16

New Theories / Re: Why light change its' speed and direction during refraction?

« on: 09/08/2022 12:55:02 »

More or less the one given in that video- in which the guy cites Feynman's books on the subject.
Those books are older than I am

Well that's pretty humorous, so apparently the video is accurate it's just that hamdani doesn't understand it.

17

New Theories / Re: Why light change its' speed and direction during refraction?

« on: 09/08/2022 12:47:38 »

Have you seen the video?

No, the reason there is no need to see it is this statement you made:
"The explanation offered in this video is more compatible with my own experiments".

You are not physicist (probably haven't even taken a single physics course) and your posting history is full of errors and misconceptions, so if the video disagrees with mainstream physics and aligns with your ideas then it is not worth watching.

18

New Theories / Re: Why light change its' speed and direction during refraction?

« on: 09/08/2022 03:30:21 »

why?

Because we already know why the speed of light slows down when it passes through glass, water, etc. obviously.

19

New Theories / Re: Why light change its' speed and direction during refraction?

« on: 08/08/2022 12:08:13 »

I expect to see massive revisions on physics textbooks in not so distant future

I don't.. 

20

New Theories / Re: Invariant Transformation between Vector & Scalar Interpretation of the Particle

« on: 08/08/2022 02:07:45 »

This is the way that the KE and PE relationship in simple harmonic motion is usually presented:

Graph is from:  phys.libretexts.org

I think this typical presentation is more intuitive than your graph, but your graph looks correct, except that the axis should be just PE or KE not density.