The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. Question of the Week
  4. QotW - 19.10.14 - Are most animals edible? Would the dinosaurs be edible?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

QotW - 19.10.14 - Are most animals edible? Would the dinosaurs be edible?

  • 8 Replies
  • 5114 Views
  • 3 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MarianaM (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 57
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Scientists production intern
    • View Profile
QotW - 19.10.14 - Are most animals edible? Would the dinosaurs be edible?
« on: 14/10/2019 12:02:31 »
Dan asks...

I watched a survival show, where the host caught a skunk, cooked it and ate it, but said it was awful. It got me wondering - are most animals edible? We hear about not eating wild mushrooms or puffer fish, but it seems that almost everything is edible. Does evolution play a role? And taking that to an extreme, what are the odds that dinosaurs were edible?

What do you think? Can you satisfy Dan's hunger?
Logged
 



Offline chiralSPO

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 3697
  • Activity:
    5.5%
  • Thanked: 512 times
    • View Profile
Re: QotW - 19.10.14 - Are most animals edible? Would the dinosaurs be edible?
« Reply #1 on: 14/10/2019 18:55:58 »
Cooking can turn many inedible things into at least somewhat edible foods.

But we probably wouldn't even need that to eat dinosaurs (though it would be much tastier cooked). Since we can eat most reptiles (lizards, snakes, turtles etc.), which branched off before the dinos, and we can eat most birds (chicken, pigeon, duck, emu, etc.), which evolved from dinosaurs, I would say its a safe bet we could eat dinosaur meat.
Logged
 

Online Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 27185
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 907 times
    • View Profile
Re: QotW - 19.10.14 - Are most animals edible? Would the dinosaurs be edible?
« Reply #2 on: 14/10/2019 19:23:15 »
Depending on your definition, there's a lot of money being made in Southern fried dinosaur.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Hayseed

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 350
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 11 times
  • Naked Science Forum Crackpot
    • View Profile
Re: QotW - 19.10.14 - Are most animals edible? Would the dinosaurs be edible?
« Reply #3 on: 17/10/2019 14:48:04 »
Only a small young one.  Only harvest what can be readily eaten.  Less parasites.  And not as tough.  And only a small fire needed for the benefit for future generations.

The eggs should be excellent.  And have a short storage period.

Taste like cooter.
Logged
The proper hardware will eliminate all theory.
 

Offline Monox D. I-Fly

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 446
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 7 times
    • View Profile
Re: QotW - 19.10.14 - Are most animals edible? Would the dinosaurs be edible?
« Reply #4 on: 18/10/2019 04:37:20 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 14/10/2019 19:23:15
Depending on your definition, there's a lot of money being made in Southern fried dinosaur.
Well, KFCs are fried dinosaurs.
Logged
 



Online Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 27185
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 907 times
    • View Profile
Re: QotW - 19.10.14 - Are most animals edible? Would the dinosaurs be edible?
« Reply #5 on: 19/10/2019 01:32:32 »
Quote from: Monox D. I-Fly on 18/10/2019 04:37:20
Quote from: Bored chemist on 14/10/2019 19:23:15
Depending on your definition, there's a lot of money being made in Southern fried dinosaur.
Well, KFCs are fried dinosaurs.
Or not; depending on your definition.
That's kind of ... the point.

Also
All mushrooms are edible... once.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline diverjohn

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 87
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
    • View Profile
Re: QotW - 19.10.14 - Are most animals edible? Would the dinosaurs be edible?
« Reply #6 on: 19/10/2019 03:16:31 »
Animal that don't want to be made into meals may spend resources creating toxic substances to deter hungry animals. Toads, some ants, blow-fish, and so forth.
Logged
 

Offline Monox D. I-Fly

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 446
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 7 times
    • View Profile
Re: QotW - 19.10.14 - Are most animals edible? Would the dinosaurs be edible?
« Reply #7 on: 19/10/2019 07:45:34 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 19/10/2019 01:32:32
Quote from: Monox D. I-Fly on 18/10/2019 04:37:20
Quote from: Bored chemist on 14/10/2019 19:23:15
Depending on your definition, there's a lot of money being made in Southern fried dinosaur.
Well, KFCs are fried dinosaurs.
Or not; depending on your definition.
That's kind of ... the point.

Also
All mushrooms are edible... once.

Well, I was just trying to sound badass by stating that I eat dinosaurs for breakfast.
Logged
 

Offline chiralSPO

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 3697
  • Activity:
    5.5%
  • Thanked: 512 times
    • View Profile
Re: QotW - 19.10.14 - Are most animals edible? Would the dinosaurs be edible?
« Reply #8 on: 22/10/2019 08:36:42 »
Quote from: diverjohn on 19/10/2019 03:16:31
Animal that don't want to be made into meals may spend resources creating toxic substances to deter hungry animals. Toads, some ants, blow-fish, and so forth.

Indeed. I had left out the first part of the OP's question in my first response.

I think a greater percentage of animals are edible than plants because animals can defend themselves by being fast, or strong, or smart.

Plants and fungi and bacteria defend themselves with chemical weapons.

Most of the edible plants we eat are parts that the plants "want" us to eat--like fruits, or they have been selectively bred by humans for millennia (or, like tapioca/yuca/manioc/cassava, we just boil the heck out of it to destroy the toxins...)
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: edible  / animals  / dinosaurs 
 

Similar topics (5)

QotW - 15.08.24 - Why do major keys sound happy and minor keys sound mournful?

Started by thedocBoard Question of the Week

Replies: 10
Views: 50265
Last post 05/04/2018 03:06:55
by Monox D. I-Fly
QotW - 08.04.06 - Better to drink wine than to drink nothing?

Started by thedocBoard Question of the Week

Replies: 36
Views: 117729
Last post 07/08/2021 00:12:57
by Zer0
QotW - 18.08.02 - Why are non-stick pans non-stick?

Started by Adam MurphyBoard Question of the Week

Replies: 6
Views: 44026
Last post 18/01/2020 06:33:19
by evan_au
What is the gall bladder, what does a gall bladder do and do animals have one?

Started by hamzaBoard Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 5
Views: 17205
Last post 22/11/2007 04:59:02
by SquarishTriangle
QotW - 10.03.28 - Is a human bite worse than a dog bite?

Started by thedocBoard Question of the Week

Replies: 11
Views: 54955
Last post 06/10/2021 16:43:29
by Liaata
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.123 seconds with 58 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.