0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
No, actually I'm not picking your brain. I have a load of work on file...….not afraid to talk about it and I know what its about, and it's very hard for me right now to even consider how to change it.If I am picking your brain, right now I'm asking a question relevant to a paper I'm posting that was actually in final print months before any of these conversations. I'm pinching myself really regarding why "negative energy" as a concept was dropped. I stated this thread not with your brain in mind, yet I am very happy you're listening.My work is here: http://www.equusspace.com/index-2.htm
Have you read my first paper? Mathematically, that's not scratch, it's a golden-ratio code for time causing the need to scratch up space. Scratch is secondary.
and “time” as the “feature” that divides and “qualifies” each 0-scalar spatial reference is discussed.
Here's some music to listen to while we both read stuff...….Steve Vai……
What we’re proposing here is that which gives space it’s feature, of “cradling” everything, is “time”; as one spacecannot be elsewhere, the effect of time “changes” a reference of space, gives each 0-scalar point of space it’s“uniqueness”
I see the point you're making.Take yourself into a massive sphere of mass, and hollow it. Put yourself there, dead centre. Do you feel gravity? No gravity? Time must be fast there, right?How can space in that dead centre be timeless?
But if you're the mass in that hollow sphere, you're thinking, "what gravitational influence beyond this big rock is swaying me this way or that", right?
Take the celestial objects around that massive object, hollow nonetheless.....the pull, the influence......you in the centre of that hollow object, being strung within an oceanic ballerina upon you dancing with the Moon, then the more subtle planetary influences...….its just science, right?Could also be hell, stuck there because that's the only place that stuff really makes sense?