0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

This is simply a thought experiment Let a room containing two observers A and B represent an inertial frame of reference. They will measure the speed of light as it propagates across the room in one direction to be travelling at speed c, a finite speed. This is an average of the speeds in opposing directions. A true one-way measure of the speed of light is not attainable.If one observer changes his position to a different speed within the room the fact that he cannot measure a change in the speed of one directional light from his new speed does not mean he hasn’t changed his speed relationship with the speed of that light. Intuitively and logically he has. One-way speed of light remained constant while the 2nd observer was accelerated to a new speed. This is a true occurrence. The two observers in the room have different speed relationships with the speeds of light within the room.It required a force to alter the speed relationship. Why not look at the converse idea? Perhaps changes to a field of space that affect the speeds of light are changes that can alter our position (relative to a different unaffected space) so that we retain our speed relationship with the changing field. We can only resist this change from our relative position with force which causes us to undergo change in speed relationship as the speeds of light change. Suppose we put B in a field and the field undergoes a change such that it alters the speeds of light. The changes are balanced. We remain outside the field and view the affects.As speed of light right increases and speed of light left decreases, and the changes are balanced, B will fall right and maintain its relative position with the speeds of light. If the speed of light left increases and the speed of light right decreases in balance, B will accelerate left and retain its relative position.If B is held in its position by force, it will undergo changes in its relationship to the speeds of light. It is prevented from falling.Acceleration is proportional to the rate of balanced change of the speeds of light. Another way to look at this is to imagine our surrounding space along with its speed of light being accelerated right while we are held in our position by a force which does not allow us to fall with the accelerated space. We can say that we have been detached from our original inertial frame of reference by force as space accelerates away from us. As space accelerates away, we undergo balanced changes in speed relationship with the speeds of light. A changing balanced field of light speed identifies an accelerated motion of space. A gravitational field.So how does light relate to a gravitational field around a mass. A changing balanced field can be a sloped field. The speeds of light must be in balanced change around a mass. If the inertial frame of reference that the speed of light travels through is pulled in by gravity and falls inward, a sloped balanced changing field of light speed is created. The speed of light inbound increase while the speed of light outbound decreases as we venture closer to the mass. Starting from an infinite distance away, the inertial frame of reference containing the speeds of light (travelling at speed c in both directions) will fall and maintain a speed equal to the gravitational escape velocity. Note the speeds of light retain their relative speeds within a falling space.Therefore speed of light around a mass is c+v inbound and c-v outbound, v being the fall escape velocity as a function of distance. The acceleration rate of fall is determined by the rate of balanced change of the speeds of light, being caused by gravitational pull and equal to the rate of acceleration of the fall escape velocity.We can see then how a clock maintaining a position in a gravitational field mimics a speed and undergoes relativistic effects (dilation of time and length contraction). This seems to me a clearer picture than a ball bending a blanket.And of course one should wonder what happens to the properties of space when changes to the speeds of light are not balanced?

Sea level is the same no matter if the water is in the clouds, on top of mountains, or in river and streams.

This is secondary to time, since distance is more of less uniform when both time vector acts, but the the time vectors opposite and the second time vector can be variable to itself.

Quote from: puppypower on 06/08/2021 13:24:13Sea level is the same no matter if the water is in the clouds, on top of mountains, or in river and streams.Sea level is rising.Quote from: puppypower on 06/08/2021 13:24:13This is secondary to time, since distance is more of less uniform when both time vector acts, but the the time vectors opposite and the second time vector can be variable to itself.Time is not a vector; no matter how many times you try to pretend that it is.

I often wondered why the experts in climate change do not mention the variability of earth's gravity,

Why depend on deception?

This is less to do with science and more to do with the benefactors of science.

As far as time being a vector, time moves to the future; has a definitive direction. It does not matter if relativity is acting on the scalar of time, the vector of time is always to the future. This may be unconventional but it is descriptive.

I like the idea of time-space over space-time since we place the power supply first and the passive variable responds. This is closer to how reality works.

Gravity is an acceleration d/t/t or is one part distance and two parts time.

Currently, we interface the power supply; gravity,

It makes more sense to

As far as time being a vector, time moves to the future; has a definitive direction.

This may be unconventional but it is descriptive.

Gravity is an acceleration d/t/t or is one part distance and two parts time. If we use time-space we have a way to directly interface the dynamic variable of photons, with the energy supply of gravity.

Currently, we interface the power supply; gravity, to the passive variable; wavelength, which then transfers to the dynamic variable; frequency. This is like using gears. It makes more sense to connected the two power supplies; gravity and frequency to alter the passive variable; wavelength; frequency modulation.