[Paul25 (OP)]

The Shapley Attractor is the region of highest density we are 'falling' to. In both time and space.

[Kryptid]

The Shapley Attractor is the region of highest density we are 'falling' to. In both time and space.

What evidence do you have that it has an event horizon?

[Paul25 (OP)]

The Shapley Attractor is the region of highest density we are 'falling' to. In both time and space.

What evidence do you have that it has an event horizon?

From our position of medium density between the dipoles the event horizon of this area is aberrated (reduced in this case) by intervening gravitation and matter obscuring our observation. From a region of low density it would be more evident. I did not claim there would be evidence, it just follows from a logical chain of thought.

[Paul25 (OP)]

Gravity aberrates spacetime rather than bends it.

[Paul25 (OP)]

Consider these thought experiments: If a massive object were to approach a black hole the event horizon would have a reduced radius due to the change in equilibrium of gravitational potential. Another example is if you flew in the opposite direction to a black hole the event horizon would increase in radius, if flying towards it will reduce to that observer, the event horizon's radius is dependent on the observers reference frame. The event horizon can never be breached by an observer due to the gravitational effects of time dilation and length contraction of the Schwarzchild radius within that frame of reference.

[Paul25 (OP)]

Any measurement is subject to the gravitational field of the observer.

[Paul25 (OP)]

Gravity can be better understood as a temporal inversion of the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Gravity is a mediation in pressure flowing from low and towards high density (pressure). This law also describes how locally time (motion) is slowed by density (pressure).

[Paul25 (OP)]

The 'big bang' event initially had time in the forward direction, at some point there was a temporal inversion where pressure mediation was inverted into gravity. 

[Paul25 (OP)]

On the edge of the universe matter is of a lower density producing less gravitational time dilation and hence a faster rate of time. This gives the appearance of an inflationary expansion relative to our reference frame of higher density.

[Paul25 (OP)]

The spacetime of the universe is like a candy wrapping. Twisted at each end, the true parameters are obscured if observed from the interior.

[Kryptid]

Please stop double posting. If you have something new to add, then go back and edit your last post.

[Paul25 (OP)]

The theory that light cannot escape a black hole has never been proven in the lab. What we can show in experiments is that wavelength will red shift, as energy leaves zones of gravity based  contracted space-time. Math is not 100% reliable since math can be used to prove the physics of game engines using virtual reality; infinite lives. Experiments are needed to separate the real from the virtual. Infinite lives will not show up under experimental conditions, even if the game engine math says on the computer screen. A good conceptual foundation supersedes math, since math is like a faithful horse that will obey even a poor conceptual or virtual master.

I agree with the first bit about light never having been proven to emit from a black hole.
What's all that stuff about infinite lives?

[Paul25 (OP)]

The current theory; energy cannot leave a black hole, mays still be a very good empirical approximation for what is going on.

Whether energy leaves a black hole would be dependent on your frame of reference.

[Kryptid]

Whether energy leaves a black hole would be dependent on your frame of reference.

Did you miss this?

Please stop double posting. If you have something new to add, then go back and edit your last post.

[Blimey]

If there is a boundary, what is on the other side?

[Paul25 (OP)]

If there is a boundary, what is on the other side?

An inversion

[Blimey]

In what, exactly?

[Paul25 (OP)]

In what, exactly?

Everything, like a double mirror reflection.

[Blimey]

An onion theory.

[Paul25 (OP)]

An onion theory.

an onion where the shells stretch off to infinity in either direction, from a conceptual perspective.