Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side => New Theories => Topic started by: JoeBrown on 06/04/2016 21:34:49
-
(currently published only here)
Joseph Michael Brown
Newark, Delaware, 197902
United States of America
The theory of Lambda Shift
Separates COMs then ties
General Relativity & Quantum Mechanics
Two Fields
Two Spins
One photon
Five mass weight arrangements
Two opposing infinities
One new shift-definition
Descriptions only! All calculations exist and deemed by author as correct in solution they provide based on principles and tenants of science due to peer review. Principles have been extrapolated and simplified to represent them in basic terms of common knowledge.
For the sake of simply understanding the Universe I (the author) have used simple logic to grind terms into a simply understood terminology to expand my understandings. If you (the reader) accept my reasoning you will simply understand.
For brevity I will only refer terms, as I understand them, in terms representative of common knowledge.
To expand use of infinite solutions in terms of expansion has caused confusion within the body of Lambda-CDM solutions derived from expansion and how we understand the Universe as a whole.
About the author
A steady state is contrived within this thesis. I had to accept this as a possibility. Steady state I refer has not been well defined. Steady state I describe exhibits tension in cosmological redshift.
I voided all thought of Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) to simplify this development.
(I have ignored all tenants of CMBR aspects of the theory of Big Bang. I have no idea if it has or has not happened. I haven't contemplated CMBR (period). BB postulates are unknown and non-relevant within this thesis. However I have become to believe they are unlikely to survive after this thesis becomes accepted and common knowledge.)
The author is not a physicist, nor certified in any field other than associates degree in data processing (DT&CC 1989). Being afforded a brief period time void of any typical human responsibility, has chosen to apply the wealth of information availed through the Internet to better personal understanding of the Universe.
Having analyzed and simplified ones own understanding from that of others in universal proportions of knowledge, I have distilled other’s concepts and developed my own simple understanding.
I believe understand and wish to share, requesting others to simply accept my understanding as is, while requesting readers avoid reasoning the Dunning-Kruger effect.
An analytical mind is not a product orthodox training. Orthodox training provides wealth of knowledge in structured formats availed to individuals for their own analysis. Calculus is used to describe every evolution possible. Integrating logic through knowledge over time is a calculation of each their own.
May we all use analytic techniques well!
Basic components to understand a simplified thesis
General Relativity (GR) and Quantum Mechanics (QM) are interrelated approaches to describing massive particles relation to two distinct fields and relations to products of mass spins.
COM is used to identify specific coordinate of a massive object position in space-time (gravity field) relation (within QM also used in electromagnetic (EM) fields independent of gravity).
GRCOM - gravity field specific
QMCOM - EM field specific
There are two infinite solutions distinct within GR.
- Infinite black hole solution - zero time and massive-space region of event horizon is a negative space solution. Without time results in infinite solutions for GRCOM objects. There is cosmological evidence these entities exist and consume regions of massive-space with infinite time.
- Infinite atomic solution - region of time-space zero is a positive finite mass solutions (proton, electron and neutron (neutron likely stable proton & positron increase in QMCOM area of finite mass solution, probably deflect photons).
Both infinite solutions have been considered errors. Error is the incorrect solution. They are not equal but are opposite solutions to infinite results. The difference between the two infinities is describes the entire field of gravity or the whole of space and time as described by GR in purely simple terms.
Einstein predicted exactly two shifts associated with photon interactions with GRCOM objects.
He never bothered to look in the deep dark unsightly black hole of infinite solution for a third explanation. Instead he looked toward the Quantum Mechanic definitions of EM fields to provide better understanding of General Relativity and its relation to Quantum Mechanics.
QMCOM objects have volume in space-time cordial representation used in GRCOM only to identify position for space-time relations.
Its not simple to understand why its necessary, but its simple once its understood.
Unexplained shift explained
Cosmological redshift (Dark Energy) does not make sense within boundaries of space-time expansion as changing lambda value. It will remain an unexplained expansion if this continues.
When one refers to cosmological redshift as it represents an imbalance of tension between two infinities of space-time. One might consider that there are two opposing forces to the gravity field resulting in infinite solutions. The gravity field is space-time tension between two infinities.
When one adds mass to the infinite solution of a black-hole infinity remains the value the mass gains event horizon increasing gravity-space producing tension on space-time lambda values shifts light in space-time tension change is the red shifting effect propagating from each black hole.
Large mass quantities can only enter a hole at formation time during super nova events
Photons are virtually massless but are believed incapable of exiting event horizon due to gravity strength.
Speculations:
This aint iron causing nova event.
Iron may be balance point of an atoms infinity of massless-space
Its a mass to hole conversion nova event
[h3]Defining mass[/h3]
Einstein did a fantastic job as a physicist. He showed us formulas for gravity. I’m no Einstein, still wondering how he managed to define as much as he did. I haven’t found the thought experiment he started with, although I’ve been clearing cobwebs trying to figure it out.
In order to relate GR & QM expanding Dr. E’s. work is needed. That’s where he left off, and I dare bite the apple right squarely in the tree of knowledge. We don’t understand photons clearly because Einstein only saw certain aspects and described them through a few formulas. One very simple formula is known by many. Einstein figured it out, but he didn’t fully describe the difference between energy and mass is spin. Spin is a little confusing to me, so I’ll try to make it clear so reader and author understand clearly how it all relates.
Two spins two fields many opposites ensue. We’ll limit to our visible understanding for now and keep the negatives in imaginary space for now.
Definitions Tying GR & QM together
The Photon
Photon is the smallest mass particle (although that seems somewhat spin dependent).
A photon can travel through space at the speed of light.
For a photon to ride a gravity wave it must have gravity-time spin:
mass value -1
time alignment +1
space-time and EM fields aligned in (parallel or perpendicular?)
When a group of photons depart an atom they receive signature in frequency line spectral distribution denoting how many in frequency compression (energy) a time of departure on a specific gravity wave angle of ascent.
[/b]Atoms & Mass[/b]
e=mc2
Do I need say more? Yes. If professor E. didn’t finish…
Oppositely the same?
At time of energy release, polarities flip, waves collapse into opposing waves.
The solid = energy release = space at one point in time.
C is the photon count and speed of light.
Appearing at opposite ends fields boundaries of infinities in GR time and space flip at zeros of these boundaries.
Neither is clearly visible except in math, with a donut shapes for spin representation. One produces clearly visible results of mixing two sets of perpendicular forces. Atoms appear visible in mix matched set fuzzy solids in our reality.
Two universes, one visible reality, striking polar negatives (careful playing w/matches).
Polar Opposites
Positive and Negative Ranges
atom / black hole opposites ends of GR space-time boundaries
photon / space opposites in polarity orientation
time / pressure field strengths
wave / solid fields between infinity edges
hot / cold field range temperature energies
electricity / magnetism polarity orientation
gravity / time polarity orientation
It’s terribly confusingly simple. GR & QM are opposites in what the describe, but they really do describe very much the same things. Difference lies in these two facts:
GR focuses on COMs in space-time fields
QM focuses on COMs in electro-magnetic fields
The difference is the size in field differential. Gravity (space-time) is the larger all encompassing field. EM while stronger is the smaller field as we see things.
GR is the larger scale encompassing COMs on this side of the Black Hole where electric is stronger than magnetic, and EM stronger than gravity.
If there are intelligent beings on the other side of the hole, their Dr. E. probably (Dr F. as in Frankenstein for giggles) chose to start with electromagnetism then tried to understand how it fits with space-time.
Atoms / Black Holes
Oppositely the same. Both have donut shapes mixing two spins together oppositely. The spins are coincidently opposites.
Both are made of a photon count that changes at about the point of a singularity in equation. The difference is how their spins operate together.
Atoms like their gravity (weak force gravity), attract and repel other atoms, in time with high frequency, through electromagnetic force (strong force EM).
Black holes like gravity (strong force gravity), attract other holes, with time in low frequency space & gravity, repelling others via EM (their weak EM).
Space-time is a field differential. EM is another. Equal yet opposites, depending on which side of the hole your on. Atoms and Holes are equals yet opposites in every manner, even in energy and mass counts.
Flow of time/gravity is opposites for them as well.
(The accelerators may be retired (pls don't forget to turn 'em off first). Wait for it... It's coming. I'll describe massive particles. You'll love it, if you haven't figured it out yet. Its freakishly simple once you get it. (or I'm a freakishly cooked in a cracked λpot.)
-
I'm not finished writing the thesis. I'm probably wrong about everything! But it seems so simple I think I must be right.
Haven't studied particle physics in great detail, so I probably won't address the particle zoo at all, however once you see my descriptions, it will hopefully make sense of it all. I'm trying not to make anything up... It's all poring out of my head fast as I can type. I'll try to keep it straight and accurate.
I started a thread in physics cosmology asking if Einstein was wrong. I'll probably voice my frustration there in the mean time...
Please wait for the thesis to be complete before commenting here (up to you, I'm just asking to hold off while I work it all out).
-
I'm not finished writing the thesis. I'm probably wrong about everything! But it seems so simple I think I must be right.
Haven't studied particle physics in great detail, so I probably won't address the particle zoo at all, however once you see my descriptions, it will hopefully make sense of it all. I'm trying not to make anything up... It's all poring out of my head fast as I can type. I'll try to keep it straight and accurate.
I started a thread in physics cosmology asking if Einstein was wrong. I'll probably voice my frustration there in the mean time...
Please wait for the thesis to be complete before commenting here (up to you, I'm just asking to hold off while I work it all out).
I have tried to follow you and tried to understand what you are saying, but I have no idea of what you are saying, can you stop trying to be so ''sciency'' and explain in simple English what you are on about?
Calm down a bit, one sentence wrote correctly is worth more than a 1000 words of gibberish. I understand your rush in life, I have been there recently , take a breath and don't get to fixated on hastily replies.
-
Joe, what do you mean by a photon riding a gravity wave?
-
Joe, what do you mean by a photon riding a gravity wave?
Well, I hate to say I got confused, but I did. My next post will try to shed light on light that makes it all seem wrong. However. I doubt you're going to enjoy the flip view of my universe. It's quite literally freqed me out.
I think am right, but what it all means has disturbed me. I'll leave that part out... Let you and others draw ur own freq'n conclusions... I got ahead of myself and stated the gravity wave. Its a bit of curiosity... still.
There's a lot that I can barely make sense of, but once ppl accept it, we'll deal with the freq issue however it pans out... At first I had to choose to believe something others don't. Now I'm not so sure I want too.
Its a lot to wrap my poor feeble mind around. Its all shockingly simple if I'm right. You'll understand why there are two different types of galaxies, forces and sides to a super nova event. A whole lot more sense to everything you don't understand, because you simply cannot see it. I've hurdled a stumbling block. It's started to flow, need to describe the tiniest pieces of the puzzle and it'll all come clear (right or wrong, you choose). I need to work my way up to a neutron, then maybe down to the proton, then electron and I'll post more.
The neutron is quite a puzzle of things we can't quite see... If I describe it right, everything else falls into place, I'll be over one hurdle. Could finish or start all over from there. Others 'll get it, and can begin to accept or not, some really freq'y stuff, once that's done. The inside of a neutron needs to be elegant to work right.
-
Hey Joe. yes Lambda shift. I have been saying that for years, I call it polarisation, it means the same thing, it came to me last night in my dream what you were on about.
Yes you are correct because I know I am correct.
I drew it you Mr Brown
[ Invalid Attachment ]
Be+Pe = >4/3 pi r³
Jeffs Be