[Origin]

motion sickness scientists, nightmare scientists and earthquake scientists

I don't think there are motions sickness scientists or nightmare scientist per se.  I think an earthquake scientist would be called a Geologist.

[Bored chemist]

you can immediately prove that my opinion is wrong.

We did.

On the Chinese quora website, I didn't see any articles published by researchers of motion sickness, earthquake and nightmare. On the English quora website, I only saw articles published by earthquake researchers in India, not by researchers of motion sickness and nightmare.

If you find that researchers of motion sickness and nightmares have published articles on the English quora website, please send out the link to the article. I will make these liars dare not continue to lie.

I'm not interested in Quora.
We proved that your ideas are wrong, and we proved it here.

[sgroclkc (OP)]

Since the emergence of the Internet, as long as it is a scientific issue of public concern, there will be professional researchers or scientists to interact with the public online. Motion sickness is the scientific problem that the public is most concerned about. However, for decades, there has never been a motion sickness researcher or doctor in the world to interact with the public on the Internet. All the articles about motion sickness searched by Google are prohibited from public comment. These facts fully prove that every researcher of motion sickness has long known that the theory of motion sickness is deceptive.

[Bored chemist]

Motion sickness is the scientific problem that the public is most concerned about.

No, it really isn't.
It can't be because a huge fraction of the public don't have access to any sort of vehicle.

Do things like that not make it clear to you that you are a deluded crank?

All the articles about motion sickness searched by Google are prohibited from public comment. These facts fully prove that every researcher of motion sickness has long known that the theory of motion sickness is deceptive.

No, it does not prove that.
Another explanation is that they simply got tired of cranks.
And, let's face it, you are a crank.

[sgroclkc (OP)]

His method is correct, but his explanation is wrong.

No
People who suffer from motion sickness (who are the actual experts) will tell you that strong odours make symptoms worse.

I designed an experiment that everyone can do to prove that carsickness is caused by low-frequency noise and has nothing to do with motion.It is to select a car with large low-frequency noise and easy to make people feel carsick, completely close the window, and the people participating in the experiment must wear an oxygen mask (to avoid suffocation and death when the air is not circulating). When the car is in neutral and the car is stationary, step on the car accelerator to the bottom to maximize the low-frequency noise in the car, It is bound to make people with good hearing carsick.

A similar experiment is done countless times every day.
The driver is exposed to the same sound as the passengers, but only the passengers get sick.

Drivers will not get carsick because their ears are stimulated by the low-frequency noise generated by the car engine for a long time, resulting in low-frequency hearing loss. Passengers get carsick because they have good low-frequency hearing.Only passengers who are usually prone to carsickness will not be carsick at all in this experiment, can prove that carsickness has nothing to do with low-frequency noise. On the contrary, it proves that carsickness has nothing to do with motion.

[Bored chemist]

Drivers will not get carsick because their ears are stimulated by the low-frequency noise generated by the car engine for a long time, resulting in low-frequency hearing loss.

Most cars are not that loud, so you are wrong.
But congratulations on actually thinking about it rather than just repeating the same nonsense.
You are wrong.
You can stop now.

[sgroclkc (OP)]

Drivers will not get carsick because their ears are stimulated by the low-frequency noise generated by the car engine for a long time, resulting in low-frequency hearing loss.

Most cars are not that loud, so you are wrong.
But congratulations on actually thinking about it rather than just repeating the same nonsense.
You are wrong.
You can stop now.

Low frequency noise is difficult to be heard by people's ears. If you can't hear low-frequency noise, it doesn't mean there is no low-frequency noise. Physicists reproduced the symptoms of carsickness through this low-frequency noise experiment. Therefore, physicists announced that they had found the cause of carsickness.Now, the motion sickness experiments of all medical experts in the world can not replicate the symptoms of carsickness, but can only simulate the symptoms of carsickness.Therefore, medical experts recognize that the cause of carsickness is still unknown.

[Origin]

Motion sickness is the scientific problem that the public is most concerned about.

No it isn't.  You are the only person I have ever heard go on about this.  It is silly and a complete waste of time. 

[Bored chemist]

Physicists reproduced the symptoms of carsickness through this low-frequency noise experiment. Therefore, physicists announced that they had found the cause of carsickness

Do you think that actually makes sense?

[sgroclkc (OP)]

Adverse Health Effects of Industrial Wind Turbine Noise: How the Ear and Brain Process Infrasound
An experiment in the late 1980s, conducted using training-mission scenarios with Navy pilots, showed that motion sickness was associated with significant amounts of acoustic energy inside the flight cabin over the frequency range from just under 1 Hz to as low as 0.05 Hz (the nauseogenic range). Maximum sensitivity occurred at approximately 0.2 Hz.
Not only Chinese scientists have found that carsickness is caused by low-frequency noise, but also scientists from other countries have found that carsickness is caused by low-frequency noise. However, so far, all medical experts still believe that the cause of carsickness is still unknown.

[Bored chemist]

Not only Chinese scientists have found that carsickness is caused by low-frequency noise, but also scientists from other countries have found that carsickness is caused by low-frequency noise.

Because, until you can answer that, nobody is going to take you seriously.

What explanation do they give for the fact that divers typically don't get sick, but passengers do?

[sgroclkc (OP)]

Not only Chinese scientists have found that carsickness is caused by low-frequency noise, but also scientists from other countries have found that carsickness is caused by low-frequency noise.

Because, until you can answer that, nobody is going to take you seriously.

What explanation do they give for the fact that divers typically don't get sick, but passengers do?

This is related to people's hearing of low-frequency noise. People with good low-frequency hearing are easy to get carsick, while deaf people who can't hear low-frequency noise won't get carsick at all. For example,Drivers or aviators long-term exposure to car Low frequency noise or after repeated exposures to the flying environment.will cause a temporary neurosensory low frequency hearing loss. Therefore, the driver or aviators will not get carsickness or airsickness.Airsickness or carsickness may also occur when a previously adapted individual returns to duty after a period of non-flying.This is because low-frequency hearing has been restored.

[sgroclkc (OP)]

https://www.motion-sickness-guru.com/causes-of-motion-sickness.html
Many people in the comments of this article have proved that seasickness are caused by low-frequency noise.

[The Spoon]

https://www.motion-sickness-guru.com/causes-of-motion-sickness.html
Many people in the comments of this article have proved that seasickness are caused by low-frequency noise.

Which shows that you do not understand the difference between evidence and anecdote, instead using the latter to justify your idiotic nonsense.

[Bored chemist]

Many people in the comments of this article have proved that seasickness are caused by low-frequency noise.

What explanation do they give for the fact that divers typically don't get sick, but passengers do?