6501
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: What would you see if you were at the big bang?
« on: 18/12/2017 04:58:54 »
Since the Big Bang singularity was smaller than a photon of visible light, you wouldn't see anything.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I am fairly sure "singularity" is just a shorthand for "the model no longer applies"
My take is that the mathematical term "singularity" should not be applied in physics but it is because it is such a sexy (false) concept.
Happy to be contradicted naturally.
Do you have any observational evidence for that assertion? I have none for mine.
I have a follow up question. Would it stand to say that if life evolved somewhere else that the most ancient and (presumably)intelligent life forms would live closer to the center of the universe. As to say they have actually existed Longer
the fact we can swim
Space flight is impossible by every standard that has been used.
I don't understand what you mean. Could you get your points a little bit easier please?
Citation needed.
Could hackers (or a evil corporation) exploit deep learning systems to obtain sensitive data about our political opinions?
Launch canceled due to bureaucracy...
http://www.desertsun.com/story/news/2017/11/25/mad-mike-hughes-cancels-rocket-launch-prove-earth-flat/894587001/
You would need to define the relevant symmetry and check on whether or not it is real.
(Spoiler alert- it isn't)
Mathematical proof is conclusive.
My experiment should appear in the literature.
I understand why you are not interested to conclude the experiment.
Molecules in solids can vibrate and rotate but molecules in liquids also move around.
Only a physicist can claim molecules in liquids and solids are moving at the same speed.
You are afraid to test conservation laws. The circuit thing is an important experiment to me.