The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. General Science
  4. Why aren't all the peaks on an electropherogram the same height?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Why aren't all the peaks on an electropherogram the same height?

  • 4 Replies
  • 6883 Views
  • 6 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mycorrhizae (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 2
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Why aren't all the peaks on an electropherogram the same height?
« on: 15/03/2020 16:41:04 »
Hi there!

I'm getting round to completing my biology A levels this year. Currently we're taking a look at all things biotechnology, and my question focuses specifically on DNA sequencing. I've just written about modern Sanger sequencing, which is obviously simplified for the textbook but from what I get-
1. Segment DNA
2.Combine a segment with primers, florescently tagged ddNTPs, dNTPs and DNA polymerase. Place in a thermocycler.
3. Separate the strands of your DNA fragment by heating to 95°c
4. Decrease temperature to 50°c so that primers can anneal
5. At 60°c, DNA polymerase will then build a complementary strand to each template strand; but only so far as the addition of a complementary terminator base/ddNTP will allow.
6. Eventually, you end up with every possible length of complementary strand possible (ie. all complementary strands whether it be to the first base or all bases along the original DNA fragment.
7. The complementary strands are then separated by length through gel or capillary electrophoresis. The lightest fragment is the first base of the complementary strand and the longest complementary strand is tagged at the last base. You look at the florescent tags from the shortest to longest complementary strand and that should reveal the sequential base order of that strand, determined on the colour of each florescent tag in representing a certain base.
These colour signatures and the order that they follow are detected by lasers that feed into a computer, which produces an electropherogram of coloured peaks so that we can observe the results.
8. Using base pairing rules, you can then "invert" the bases of the peaks to find the base order of the original, parent strand.

....thing is, they're not all the same height. It's not required knowledge, but I'd like to know why.

* images.png (7.91 kB . 318x158 - viewed 7638 times)
* GenDx.gif (19.09 kB . 768x195 - viewed 7710 times)
Why is it also that different bases can overlap in places, or that peaks of the same base can be conjoined? Is it just to do with the sensitivity of your lasers and interface? Is it to do with the fact that, technically, because you separated the original DNA fragment into two, two sets of complementary strands are being made and the machine isn't sensitive enough to differentiate between one of the parent strands being identical to one of your newly constructed DNA strands?

I'm already going off the deep end here, so if anybody could answer any of my question in a way that an A-level student could roundabout get, that would be amazing!
Thank you so much!  :) :)
Logged
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 14199
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 1077 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: Why aren't all the peaks on an electropherogram the same height?
« Reply #1 on: 15/03/2020 17:04:08 »
The vertical axis presumably is intensity of fluorescence and the horizontal, time.
What determines intensity, for a given base? Presumably, the concentration of molecules in the fluoro cell at a given time, and there is no reason why that should be constant.   
As you are dealing with complex molecules in a liquid, you can't expect them to be separated as cleanly as simple molecules in a gas carrier, and even in gas chromatography you get a spread of analyte and possible mixing due to viscous drag along the flight tube. Hence some overlap, which is visible on the entire trace but where it occurs between repeats of the same base, it looks like "conjoint" traces.
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 27186
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 908 times
    • View Profile
Re: Why aren't all the peaks on an electropherogram the same height?
« Reply #2 on: 15/03/2020 18:17:21 »
I think the separations are good- otherwise the technique simply wouldn't work.
But it's possible that the yield of labeled material is a bit variable.
It's also possible that the intensity of fluorescence is variable because of different quenching by adjacent bases, though I'd expect that effect to be small.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 14199
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 1077 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: Why aren't all the peaks on an electropherogram the same height?
« Reply #3 on: 16/03/2020 12:09:07 »
How times have changed! My A level chromatography involved red, black and blue ink and blotting paper!
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 27186
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 908 times
    • View Profile
Re: Why aren't all the peaks on an electropherogram the same height?
« Reply #4 on: 16/03/2020 20:00:35 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 16/03/2020 12:09:07
How times have changed! My A level chromatography involved red, black and blue ink and blotting paper!
In my day they improved it considerably- we had a solvent too.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: dna  / dna sequencing  / genomics  / genetics  / life sciences  / bioinformatics 
 

Similar topics (5)

Why aren't men encouraged to get "annuals" like women are?

Started by blazeBoard Cells, Microbes & Viruses

Replies: 28
Views: 19532
Last post 30/10/2008 21:47:40
by blaze
Aren't "far infrared panels" just convectors?

Started by vhfpmrBoard General Science

Replies: 0
Views: 2738
Last post 07/11/2016 14:59:12
by vhfpmr
Why aren't Oranges, Lemons & Limes different colours like Pears and Apples ?

Started by neilepBoard Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution

Replies: 5
Views: 9452
Last post 01/07/2020 09:15:03
by evan_au
Aren't measurements of the expansion of the Universe based on out of date data?

Started by Bruce Williamson Board Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 3
Views: 4689
Last post 13/04/2009 12:15:47
by yor_on
If the universe used to be smaller, why aren't ancient galaxies clustered in one area?

Started by thedocBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 7
Views: 3086
Last post 22/09/2016 23:02:03
by syhprum
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.13 seconds with 43 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.