The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Member Map
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side
New Theories
A new theory for the Tunguska Explosion of 1908
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
A new theory for the Tunguska Explosion of 1908
5 Replies
5599 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Jorge Acosta
Guest
A new theory for the Tunguska Explosion of 1908
«
on:
21/06/2008 19:53:54 »
Jorge Acosta asked the Naked Scientists:
I think everybody has it wrong!! I propose that the "EVENT" was caused by this:
1.) Earthquake in the area
2.) Massive release of methane gas trapped in the peat bogs
3.) Lightning common with earthquakes ignited the methane gas
4.) Massive explosion with formidable expansion
5.) Secondary fire storm.
What about it?
Regards,
Jorge
What do you think?
Logged
Soul Surfer
Naked Science Forum King!
3389
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 8 times
keep banging the rocks together
Best Answer
A new theory for the Tunguska Explosion of 1908
«
Reply #1 on:
21/06/2008 23:13:26 »
Interesting idea but they think they have found traces of the impacting object recently
Logged
Learn, create, test and tell
evolution rules in all things
God says so!
tedstruk
Jr. Member
21
Activity:
0%
Best Answer
A new theory for the Tunguska Explosion of 1908
«
Reply #2 on:
22/06/2008 03:18:40 »
The area is dished, that means it is a focal point of natural energy. The 60hz field around the earth is capable of creating radio atomic blasts of this size, naturally. The problem is they are so infrequent that noone cares about them. I created one.(see thread Childhood Experiment.) I think the blast was caused by a ferrous gas. It was ignited by a secondary ball lightning that was initiated in a circular weather front due to the dish shaped ground area. The thundercloud was just about as small as they come, but the igniter was stronger than the gas eruption, that's why the atmosphere didn't catch fire. Why are people so insistant on proving scientific examples. Most scientific examples are very dumb.
Logged
Bored chemist
Naked Science Forum GOD!
30351
Activity:
13%
Thanked: 1217 times
Best Answer
A new theory for the Tunguska Explosion of 1908
«
Reply #3 on:
22/06/2008 09:13:55 »
Is there the slightest justification or evidence for this statement "The 60hz field around the earth is capable of creating radio atomic blasts of this size, naturally."?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
lyner
Guest
Best Answer
A new theory for the Tunguska Explosion of 1908
«
Reply #4 on:
22/06/2008 13:49:10 »
I like this ferrous gas stuff. Tell me more.
And, in Europe, it's 50Hz, so I guess things change half way across the Atlantic.
Logged
Alan McDougall
Naked Science Forum King!
1285
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 16 times
Best Answer
A new theory for the Tunguska Explosion of 1908
«
Reply #5 on:
06/07/2008 11:11:58 »
Jorge,
Interesting theory but a commet or small asteroid or large peace of space junk more likely
«
Last Edit: 06/07/2008 11:13:38 by Alan McDougall
»
Logged
The Truth remains the Truth regardless of our beliefs or opinions the Truth is always the Truth even if we know it or do not know it (The Truth remains the Truth)
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...