The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Member Map
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side
New Theories
Is my Theory Of Gravitational Field valid?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Is my Theory Of Gravitational Field valid?
6 Replies
2175 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
aloys
(OP)
First timers
2
Activity:
0%
Naked Science Forum Newbie
Is my Theory Of Gravitational Field valid?
«
on:
11/02/2019 08:05:47 »
The Theory of Gravity
Aloysius Sebastian
aloysi.aloys@gmail.com
Abstract
Here I am about to create a new theory of gravity. In this theory I am trying to explain the range of gravity and the gravitational field. With this theory, one can calculate the range of gravitational field of an independent object. Here gravity is not depending upon the mass of a second object. Here gravity is related to the energy of the object. I am not going to replace any previous theories of gravity. Sir Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein were made wonderful theories. I am also working with those theories. Inside these theories I have been found a road to explain gravity with my thoughts. So mainly I am using their equations and adding my works with them. And now I can find the range of gravity. I can clearly say that, it is a simple theory with logics and everybody can understand it easily.
Introduction
As I wrote above, now I can find the range of gravity and I can clearly say that, gravity has a finite range. Gravity will not lead to infinity. I am here treating gravity as a form of energy. So we can find the distribution of energy at different distances. I was started thinking about gravity, when I was writing my paper “Structure of Relatively Accelerating Universe”. That was a theory about the expansion and acceleration of universe. In there the universe was accelerating under a gravitational frame. After that I have started thinking more seriously about gravity and I had some interesting leads. The findings which got that time were written as an article in my online pages. There I had found an interesting constant which I called it as “A”. It can be written as C2/G. Here “C” stands for the velocity of light and “G” stands for the universal gravitational constant. According to this constant, I have developed my ideas and find the range of the gravitational constant.
Theory
Now here we will try to find the gravitational field of an independent object. Gravitational field is related to the energy of the object. All we know that gravity is related to the mass of an object. I am also taking mass as the source of energy to calculate the gravitational field. According to Sir Isaac Newton Gravitational force between two objects is described as F = G.M1M2/r2. Here I am ignoring this equation because it is stating gravity as a force between two objects. My intention is to state gravity as a form of energy and find the strength of gravitational field in each levels.
Gravity in Newtonian Physics is
g = GM/r2 (1)
Albert Einstein in his theory states Energy of an object as
E = Mc2 (2)
As I wrote above I had find a constant in my works and that constant A is explain as
A = C2/G explained in reff: [2] (3)
So the Gravitational field we have to describe now. Here we have gravity “g” of an object, mass “m” of the object, Energy “E” of the object and constant “A” with us. By describing gravity as energy, we can describe gravitational energy at different levels.
So here I am intended to say the gravitational field of an independent object, we can explain as
GE = MA/g (4)
This equation gives us the total gravitational field of an independent object. According to this equation we can find the gravitational field which can create a mass at different levels. Once we increase the distance the energy in the field will decrease. It can be diminish up to zero. When the energy level becomes zero, there the gravity of the particular mass ends.
So the equation we can write as
GE = MA/g d (5)
Here “GE” represents the Gravitational Energy, “M” is the mass, “A” is the constant, “g” is the gravity of that mass and “d” represents for the distance.
I would like to state again that, this equation is not mentioning the gravitational force. It is for calculate the gravitational fields, where the gravitational energy is distributed. With the help of this equation we can calculate the amount of gravitational energy distributed in any distance.
Gravitational field of a companied system
Now we can have a look at a companied system like two objects or a complex system like our solar system. So if it is a two body system, these two bodies have its own gravitational fields. So these two can interact together and may be able to create a common gravitational field. The picture 1 ( Gravitational field of two masses.
Picture 1: Gravitational field of two masses.
Gravitational field of a complex system
Gravitational field of a complex system like solar system or a galaxy is also like this way. There enter multiple masses multiple range of gravitational fields.
Conclusion
Here we can describe gravitational field on the basis of the total energy of an object. If we are working with a complex system, there gravitational fields will gather together and may can act as a uniform for the total system. I am working more against with this article and will be update as soon as posiible.
Acknowledgements
Hiromi Takashima from Hakodate, Japan, for her support and advices.
Viktória Nyámádi from Hungary, for her valuable advices as an experienced teacher.
Jeni, Babyjohn and Aloysius from India, for their advices and support.
Wikipedia, for their online service and valuable articles.
«
Last Edit: 12/02/2019 07:44:56 by
chris
»
Logged
alancalverd
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum GOD!
18363
Activity:
87%
Thanked: 1549 times
life is too short to drink instant coffee
Re: Is my Theory Of Gravitational Field valid?
«
Reply #1 on:
11/02/2019 08:51:28 »
So according to your definitions, GE = MA/g = MAr
2
/GM = Ar
2
/G = c
2
r
2
/G
2
This is unfortunate as it makes the gravitational energy of an object independent of its mass. The idea that
any
property of an object (apart from its color) is independent of its mass, does rather clash with most of physics.
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
yor_on
Naked Science Forum GOD!
64733
Activity:
100%
Thanked: 176 times
(Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
Re: Is my Theory Of Gravitational Field valid?
«
Reply #2 on:
12/02/2019 06:24:24 »
I have a feeling of this being advertising, the guy doesn't answer you Alan, and possibly just put up the same idea everywhere, hasn't bothered to search though. Myself I would like it to be moved to 'New Theories' to see if he responds.
Logged
"BOMB DISPOSAL EXPERT. If you see me running, try to keep up."
aloys
(OP)
First timers
2
Activity:
0%
Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Is my Theory Of Gravitational Field valid?
«
Reply #3 on:
12/02/2019 08:51:01 »
This theory is the continuation of my article, which i was published in Linkedin in 2015. I will try to place the link of that article below. please have a look. there I have mentioned the way, how I found the constant "A" and the explanations for "(So according to your definitions, GE = MA/g = MAr2/GM = Ar2/G = c2r2/G2)".
Here I am stating that the rate of energy in the gravitational field( Uniform distribution of interacting particle) must be reach to "Zero" at certain distance. Gravitational field of an independent mass will be finite. I also states about the join gravitational system. so once a gravitational field of a mass they are bonding together.
I am sorry that I cannot reply all the comments, I cannot stay online always because of my work. I am sorry to say that I have a limit on my time table. I have been published the same thing in so many platforms, where I am not active too. I think that I am introducing my ideas to the world. It is my duty to spread my theory.
I was tried to add the link of my articles where i was mentioned the equations. unfortunately it is not allowing me to post any external links here, I am sorry
Thanks
Logged
yor_on
Naked Science Forum GOD!
64733
Activity:
100%
Thanked: 176 times
(Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
Re: Is my Theory Of Gravitational Field valid?
«
Reply #4 on:
12/02/2019 11:21:59 »
Well Aloy, if you want people to look at your idea and respond you better be here. Just 'Placing' it here is not good enough. We all love physics here.
=
Move it.
=
Spelling sux
«
Last Edit: 12/02/2019 14:53:38 by
yor_on
»
Logged
"BOMB DISPOSAL EXPERT. If you see me running, try to keep up."
alancalverd
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum GOD!
18363
Activity:
87%
Thanked: 1549 times
life is too short to drink instant coffee
Re: Is my Theory Of Gravitational Field valid?
«
Reply #5 on:
12/02/2019 14:54:17 »
Quote from: aloys on 12/02/2019 08:51:01
It is my duty to spread my theory.
You have a more important duty of intellectual honesty, to yourself at least.
Writing down equations that obviously don't make sense, and stating that a continuous function like cr goes to zero at large r, won't fool anyone into believing that you know what you are talking about.
c. 1599-1601, William Shakespeare, Hamlet, Act I, Scene III: “This above all: to thine own self be true. And it must follow, as the night the day. Thou canst not then be false to any man/Farewell, my blessing season this in thee!”.
«
Last Edit: 12/02/2019 14:57:36 by
alancalverd
»
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
jeffreyH
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum King!
6997
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 192 times
The graviton sucks
Re: Is my Theory Of Gravitational Field valid?
«
Reply #6 on:
12/02/2019 21:07:16 »
The gravity of the dilemma eludes the scribe.
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...