Naked Science Forum

General Science => General Science => Topic started by: neilep on 06/02/2006 20:08:12

Title: Kettle Boiling Versus Water Paying Quandary
Post by: neilep on 06/02/2006 20:08:12
Wifey just over filled our kettle. It's a 3kw kettle and she filled it with two pints when only one pint is needed.

What I need to know is , is it more energy efficient to discard the extra one pint so that the kettle boils quicker, and therefore using less energy (and saving money too) or is that counteracted against the cost of the water I'm pouring down the sink...we're on a water meter.

I know what you're going to ask me, and that is for the rates I'm charged for electricity and water aren't you ?...well I can't get those figures right now so I asume I've just wasted this post....and I need my coffee .....

Men are the same as women.... just inside out !!
Title: Re: Kettle Boiling Versus Water Paying Quandary
Post by: daveshorts on 06/02/2006 20:19:45
It takes 4.2kJ to warm up a litre a degree C, so you will use .42MJ to warm it up which is about .1kWh so about .6-.8p (depending on cost of electricity these days).

water is about 90p/1000l according to Thames Water, so the water will cost about .1p

so poaring water down the sink is definitely cheaper, and better for the environment.
Title: Re: Kettle Boiling Versus Water Paying Quandary
Post by: neilep on 06/02/2006 20:23:35
Dave...MANY MANY THANKS......I can now enjoy my coffee...do you want one ?



Men are the same as women.... just inside out !!
Title: Re: Kettle Boiling Versus Water Paying Quandary
Post by: chris on 06/02/2006 23:26:02
DAve - brilliant !

"I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception"
 - Groucho Marx
Title: Re: Kettle Boiling Versus Water Paying Quandary
Post by: sharkeyandgeorge on 13/02/2006 20:07:48
why not pour excess water into a jug and use later?

"Defender of the Sea"
Title: Re: Kettle Boiling Versus Water Paying Quandary
Post by: DoctorBeaver on 14/02/2006 13:26:53
Surely one must take into account when one will next use the kettle. If it is likely that shortly after boiling it, a coffee will be required, then keeping the hot water in the kettle means it will boil that much quicker next time, thus saving on the cost of electricity.
Title: Re: Kettle Boiling Versus Water Paying Quandary
Post by: neilep on 14/02/2006 22:25:08
quote:
Originally posted by sharkeyandgeorge

why not pour excess water into a jug and use later?

"Defender of the Sea"



That's exactly what I did [:)]

Men are the same as women.... just inside out !!