0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Benv - I am hoping this post will grab your attention. I want to point out that this forum thread invites the public to 'post their theories'. Any such attempt should be protected I have NEVER PROPOSED A THEORY. LOOK HARD. LOOK EVERYWHERE. NO THEORIES ON OFFER.
I am entirely able to explain how I arrived at the design and its function.
I do not believe that my circuit is able to tap into one or more undefined energy sources. Belief does not come into the question when the facts speak for themselves.I did not 'make them up'. Indeed I would love to claim such. But there you go. I am not responsible for the knowledge and facts that relate to dark energy and dark matter.
Hi again, nixietube.Definitely tapping into a 'heretofore' unidentified energy source.
Indeed we have harnessed this energy for useful work. What do you think the prototype proof of concept shows and the configurations in the applied patent show? Are you saying that I am lying?
I do stand steadfast - but in the face of ever more evidence in wider and wider replications of the effect. Would you prefer it that I and all replicators ignore the experimental evidence in favour of your bigotted denial?Your emotional state regarding your belief's is neither scientific nor relevant. I am entirely uninterested in whether you are sad or happy or whether you beleive or don't. I am only interested in the science.
I have never claimed a CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE. I have argued with the right of editors to reject a submission without first going to review.I have no intention of re-reading your posts. Your time would be better spent in reading my answers and familiarising yourself with the paper, the claim and the model.
I am obliged to answer these posts because it is my good name that is at question. This is an unfortunate consequence of having a thesis that is in the public domain. I would expect monitors to rally and keep our names outside of actionable libel suits. nixietube is flirting with that potential.
I could go on, but nixietube is doing a grand job at the moment.
The whole discussion is reduced to absurdity I am afraid. You are correct that the only path for the resistive discharge is through the diode and itself. It is hard to understand how anyone who can operate the fancy equipment for the test could come up with such incorrect answers. I am beginning to laugh at the meaningless ness of this discussion. I return to Union Square Park in 1956 in NYC to the man with the talking coconut. The coconut said that he had a simple switching circuitthat could power the world. The people did not believe the man with the talking coconut but every night he returned and stated that he had a simple switching circuit that could power the world. It was funny then and it is still funny today. Sorry Witsend. I cannot stop laughing!!! Sorry to offend but I cannot stop laughing.
He is the one unleashing the ad hominem abuse. Apparently I am the now the next target because I dare to question. Read the handful of posts I have made in this thread.